This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles
This article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.LGBTQ+ studiesWikipedia:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesTemplate:WikiProject LGBTQ+ studiesLGBTQ+ studies articles
Case of borderline notability in previous decline. A BEFORE found this and other reviews so moving to mainspace but potential AfD candidate should someone disagree. No strong opinion either way. CNMall41 (talk) 20:26, 1 December 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: Almost there on notability! I would do three things to comfortably make this ready to be a notable Start-class article, but only the first is absolutely necessary: (1) add in at least one another WP:VG/S review source or two to establish notability. There's one at Digitally Downloaded[1] and Prima Games[2]; (2) omit the Steam review mention as it's user-generated and not generally used; (3) add in authors and dates to correctly cite the sources linked as per WP:CITEWEB. Otherwise, I think it's good to go! VRXCES (talk) 07:18, 27 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]