Talk:Women in Taoism
This article is rated B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Requested move 6 December 2018
[edit]- The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.
Moved. See general agreement below to be WP:CONSISTENT with the main article title, Taoism. Kudos to editors for your input, and Happy Publishing! (nac by page mover) Paine Ellsworth, ed. put'r there 00:53, 26 December 2018 (UTC)
– Match the main article Taoism. feminist (talk) 16:44, 6 December 2018 (UTC)--Relisted. –Ammarpad (talk) 19:25, 17 December 2018 (UTC)
- Support per nomination and consistency in Wikipedia's main title headers. The Taoism article's lead sentence begins, "Taoism (/ˈdaʊɪzəm/, /ˈtaʊ-/) or Daoism (/ˈdaʊ-/), is a religious…", thus confirming that Daoism is, indeed the alternative form in English. However, the main header is Taoism, which appears to be the more frequently used English form. Roman Spinner (talk • contribs) 18:09, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- Oppose I intentionally used "Daoism" because it is preferred in academic usage, see Daoism–Taoism romanization issue. Wikipedia titles are internally inconsistent owing to an intrinsic conflict between a general rule to use pinyin romanization (e.g., Laozi, not Lao Tzu) with a few common exceptions using Wade-Giles (Tao Te Ching, not Daode Jing). Redirects solve the problem. Keahapana (talk) 22:18, 6 December 2018 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.
Deleted citation
[edit]While reformatting this article's references, I discovered one that was listed in the "References" section but actually never cited in the body. I couldn't find an online version to see where it would go, and it doesn't make sense to create a "See also" section for one little paper. Therefore I am removing this citation from the article but documenting it here, in case another contributor has a copy and wants to insert it properly.
Cahill, Suzanne E. (1990). "Practice Makes Perfect: Paths to Transcendence for Women in Medieval China". Taoist Resources. 2 (2): 23–42.
— Molly-in-md (talk) 20:46, 8 November 2020 (UTC)
Wiki Education assignment: Honors World Religions
[edit]This article was the subject of a Wiki Education Foundation-supported course assignment, between 19 August 2024 and 13 December 2024. Further details are available on the course page. Student editor(s): Patland21 (article contribs). Peer reviewers: JayVelez, Mia Madison Row.
— Assignment last updated by Gerdesk (talk) 02:45, 28 October 2024 (UTC)
- B-Class China-related articles
- High-importance China-related articles
- B-Class China-related articles of High-importance
- WikiProject China articles
- B-Class Feminism articles
- Mid-importance Feminism articles
- WikiProject Feminism articles
- B-Class Religion articles
- Low-importance Religion articles
- WikiProject Religion articles
- B-Class Women's History articles
- Mid-importance Women's History articles
- All WikiProject Women-related pages
- WikiProject Women's History articles
- B-Class Women in Religion articles
- High-importance Women in Religion articles