Jump to content

Talk:Wa people

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Wa or Va

[edit]

shouldnt it list the spelling of Va used by China in English media — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.218.94 (talk) 06:44, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Untitled

[edit]

The article needs to give the name of their language.

Gringo300 08:05, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

  • yes, it also needs to outline the fact that they are not only a Chinese ethnic minority but one of the national ethnic minorities of Burma - this information has to go beyond drug trade and armed rebeliion, as that is more of a reductionist point of view that does not take into account the cultural and historical background of this group in Burma. I'm working on this, but it might be a while until I get to this article, so if someone else wants to go for it, that's great. --Xiu Xiu 12:20, 23 Jun 2005 (UTC)

blackface controversy

[edit]

Han Chinese cultural appropriation and donning 'blackface' from the Va people http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/a/201805/05/WS5aecdee8a3105cdcf651c17a_4.html — Preceding unsigned comment added by 14.202.218.94 (talk) 04:29, 5 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Flag

[edit]

What exactly is the status of the flag that was added to the article? Is ist the flag of an administrative division, a political organisation? The byline is no sufficient explanation. —Babelfisch 03:10, 20 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The byline was changed to "Flag of the de facto Wa State in Myanmar". That's not much better. The Wa State seems to have been merged with the Shan State after independence. Did the flag have official status before that merger? What does it stand for today? The question of the status of the flag is not really answered by the new byline. —Babelfisch 01:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]
No answer, flag removed. —Babelfisch 01:00, 11 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the line "The Wa were once known as the "Wild Wa" by the British due to their practice of headhunting.[4]," the source doesn't actually support that.

[edit]

Regarding the line "The Wa were once known as the "Wild Wa" by the British due to their practice of headhunting.[4]," the source doesn't actually support that.

Requested move

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: move. -- tariqabjotu 04:42, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Va peopleWa people – These people are usually called "Wa". Almost all reliable sources refer to them as the "Wa", and so do other articles pertaining to them on Wikipedia. In fact, this article was originally at Wa, but someone unilaterally moved many years ago. For whatever reason, I can’t find the actually move, but I see it in the edit summaries and the change in text from "Wa" to "Va". RGloucester (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC) RGloucester (talk) 17:24, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Can you please explain your reasons for oppposition? Remember, this is not a vote: it is based on quality arguments. RGloucester (talk) 12:00, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
It would run into a disambiguation issue. The Japanese people was in the past called the Wa. --Article editor (talk) 23:50, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
That's not a valid reason to ignore convention/reliable sources….and it's easy to remedy with a WP:Hatnote.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 00:24, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support "Wa" is better both for internal consistency (to match all the other articles mentioning the language or the people) and for consistency with most, if not all, of the source material which refer to the language and the people as "Wa". The move to "Va people" was done unilaterally with no reasons given and no sources to support such a move.--William Thweatt TalkContribs 17:20, 14 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
  • Support Wa is far more common than Va. Encyclopedia Britannica uses Wa, see here. -Zanhe (talk) 17:36, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

Sorting references

[edit]
  • Donald M. Seekins, (2006). Historical Dictionary of Burma (Myanmar). Scarecrow Press, ISBN 9780810864863. p.469: "They speak a language belonging to the Wa-Palaung subgroup of the Mon-Khmer language group; in recent years, heavy Chinese influence has resulted in the widespread use of Mandarin." (Google Books preview)
  • Peoples of the World Foundation: "While most Wa can still speak their original language, many learn languages other than their own — especially Burmese and Mandarin."
  • Myanmar Tourism website: "The Wa language only took a written form in 1957 and it is a very unique member of the Austroasiatic family of languages. Many Wa are bilingual and the working language of much of the Wa State is Putonghua/Mandarin Chinese."

To be expanded at a future date. --benlisquareTCE 12:03, 2 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to one external link on Wa people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}} after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}} to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers. —cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 05:12, 30 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Wa people. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 05:08, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Name of this ethnic group prior to 1949

[edit]

Was this ethnic group's name "Kawa" prior to the establishment of the People's Republic of China in 1949? 173.88.246.138 (talk) 01:23, 21 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]