Talk:WCW/nWo Revenge

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

A request for a screenshot has been made to help better illustrate the article. (VG images department)

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Lisette Titre-Montgomery (1 participant)
Party royale game (2 participants)
List of Minecraft characters (5 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (5 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants; relisted)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)
TheoTown (12 participants; relisted)
Zero Hour (video game) (6 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

Sun Haven

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Professional wrestling Low‑importance

	WCW/nWo Revenge is within the scope of WikiProject Professional wrestling, an attempt to improve and standardize articles related to professional wrestling. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, visit the project to-do page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to discussions.Professional wrestlingWikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestlingTemplate:WikiProject Professional wrestlingProfessional wrestling
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Wow. This is a HORRIBLE article. Very badly written all throughout. The entire thing reads like a smug, self-centered, opinion article about the author's opinion of the game, using every other sentence to make up his own imaginary "facts" that have no resources cited or research indicated. It uses most of it's tone in extremely biased, weasel-worded fashion from one author's point of view. It keeps on saying things like "Everyone agrees that this is the best game of it's kind" and "the magic in this mode comes from the wonderful way this was done" or "Clearly this mode was done very well" or "Most people agree that this mode suffered from this thing that people didn't like." This is unacceptable. Wikipedia articles are for facts. They aren't for one author's egotistical ranting and singular "review" of the game. Wikipedia is not a review site. It's an encyclopedic fact site. This entire article should be deleted outright and re-written entirely from scratch.

Irelevent Information?

Personally, I think all the talk about Warzone in the History section is a bit, well, irelevent to the article? It may fit into a "Comparison to Contemporary Wrestling Games" or "Critical Reaction" section or something, but it doesn't really have too much to do with the history of this game. Any thoughts? Exist2inspire 16:44, 4 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Managers

Should it be mentioned that you can activate a manager if you use the 3rd or forth controller port? It says they are non-playable characters but they are semi-playable.

A 1999 Article?

The article says something to the effect of "a 1999 article by IGN confirms this as the best-selling wrestling game of all time". Can we get a more recent source to confirm that it remains such even after all of the SvRs have come out? — Preceding unsigned comment added by JY23 (talk • contribs) 22:51, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]