Talk:Typhoon Faxai (2001)

Typhoon Faxai (2001) has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Review: March 8, 2024. (Reviewed version).

Articles for creation

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC
	This article was accepted from this draft on 30 November 2023 by reviewer Hey man im josh (talk · contribs).

Weather: Tropical / Western Pacific Low‑importance

	Weather portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details. Articles Requested Project Resources Become a Member Project Talk Assessment A-Class Alerts WeatherWikipedia:WikiProject WeatherTemplate:WikiProject WeatherWeather
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	Tropical cyclones portal This article is supported by WikiProject Tropical cyclones (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Pacific typhoon work group (assessed as Low-importance).

Micronesia: Federated States of Micronesia / Guam / Northern Mariana Islands Low‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Micronesia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Micronesia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MicronesiaWikipedia:WikiProject MicronesiaTemplate:WikiProject MicronesiaMicronesia
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by WikiProject Federated States of Micronesia (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Guam work group (assessed as Low-importance).
	This article is supported by the Northern Mariana Islands work group (assessed as Low-importance).

GA Review

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

This review is transcluded from Talk:Typhoon Faxai (2001)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk · contribs) 14:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Calling dibs/I will review this within the week. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 14:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The first two paragraphs in Meteorological history should both be split into two because they are very long atm.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

31W is not italicised while 33W is. I believe they must be consistent.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

tropical tropical cyclone, must it be stated twice or was this in error?

Done: error luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Link UTC.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

JTWC estimated that Faxai was a typhoon in 18:00 UTC, to JTWC estimated that Faxai was a typhoon at 18:00 UTC.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

In Christmas Day, to On Christmas Day.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The LLCC and convection however, remained, to The LLCC and convection, however, remained.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Remove the link to Kosrae in Preparations and impact because it is already linked in the above section.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Damage was also reported to banana crops. I believe must be Damage to banana crops was also reported. You employ this style of writing throughout the article and it is used correctly, but I believe it does not work here, or at least I have never seen it used in this way. Feel free to kindly refute/correct me.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The west shore of the island experienced coastal flooding, as many rocks were lifted onto the road of that portion the last two words in this extract are ambiguous: what is that portion referring to?

Done: changed that portion to that shore to hopefully clear things up. luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Pohnpei must not be linked either for the same reason as Kosrae.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is the sizeable portion dedicated to the indirect death really necessary?

I'm not sure if you are referring to the one in Guam or the one in Kosrae, but I have trimmed the one in Guam since I don't think the one in Kosrae had much detail. luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes this is what I was referring to; apologies for the ambiguity! I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 17:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the ten people who lived in the island at the time, can be more concise: the ten residents of the island at the time.

Done luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Spotcheck

Passes with flying wikitext.

@JCMLuis: you are a very talented writer. I have finished my review. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh?: I have addressed your concerns. luis 💬 16:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lovely! Looks more than eligible for Good Article status now. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 17:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.