Talk:Typhoon Faxai (2001)/GA1
GA Review
[edit]The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
| GA toolbox |
|---|
| Reviewing |
Article (edit | visual edit | history) · Article talk (edit | history) · Watch
Reviewer: I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk · contribs) 14:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
Calling dibs/I will review this within the week. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 14:35, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- The first two paragraphs in Meteorological history should both be split into two because they are very long atm.
- 31W is not italicised while 33W is. I believe they must be consistent.
- tropical tropical cyclone, must it be stated twice or was this in error?
Done: error luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Link UTC.
- JTWC estimated that Faxai was a typhoon in 18:00 UTC, to JTWC estimated that Faxai was a typhoon at 18:00 UTC.
- In Christmas Day, to On Christmas Day.
- The LLCC and convection however, remained, to The LLCC and convection, however, remained.
- Remove the link to Kosrae in Preparations and impact because it is already linked in the above section.
- Damage was also reported to banana crops. I believe must be Damage to banana crops was also reported. You employ this style of writing throughout the article and it is used correctly, but I believe it does not work here, or at least I have never seen it used in this way. Feel free to kindly refute/correct me.
- The west shore of the island experienced coastal flooding, as many rocks were lifted onto the road of that portion the last two words in this extract are ambiguous: what is that portion referring to?
- Done: changed that portion to that shore to hopefully clear things up. luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Pohnpei must not be linked either for the same reason as Kosrae.
- Is the sizeable portion dedicated to the indirect death really necessary?
- I'm not sure if you are referring to the one in Guam or the one in Kosrae, but I have trimmed the one in Guam since I don't think the one in Kosrae had much detail. luis 💬 16:04, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Yes this is what I was referring to; apologies for the ambiguity! I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 17:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)
- the ten people who lived in the island at the time, can be more concise: the ten residents of the island at the time.
- Spotcheck
Passes with flying wikitext.
@JCMLuis: you are a very talented writer. I have finished my review. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 15:41, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- @I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh?: I have addressed your concerns. luis 💬 16:07, 7 March 2024 (UTC)
- Lovely! Looks more than eligible for Good Article status now. I clicked the 'help me choose' button and this is what it generated - strange, huh? (talk) 17:49, 8 March 2024 (UTC)