This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Hurricane Helene article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Weather, which collaborates on weather and related subjects on Wikipedia. To participate, help improve this article or visit the project page for details.
This article is part of WikiProject Alabama, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Alabama on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.AlabamaWikipedia:WikiProject AlabamaTemplate:WikiProject AlabamaAlabama articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Florida. If you would like to join us, please visit the project page; if you have any questions, please consult the FAQ.FloridaWikipedia:WikiProject FloridaTemplate:WikiProject FloridaFlorida articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Caribbean, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to the countries of the Caribbean on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines.CaribbeanWikipedia:WikiProject CaribbeanTemplate:WikiProject CaribbeanCaribbean articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Mexico, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Mexico on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.MexicoWikipedia:WikiProject MexicoTemplate:WikiProject MexicoMexico articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cuba, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Cuba related articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CubaWikipedia:WikiProject CubaTemplate:WikiProject CubaCuba articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Georgia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Georgia (U.S. state)Wikipedia:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Template:WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state)Georgia (U.S. state) articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject United States, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of topics relating to the United States of America on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the ongoing discussions.
Hurricane Helene is within the scope of WikiProject Tennessee, an open collaborative effort to coordinate work for and sustain comprehensive coverage of Tennessee and related subjects in the Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, and even become a member. [Project Articles] • [Project Page] • [Project Talk] • [Assessment] • [Template Usage]TennesseeWikipedia:WikiProject TennesseeTemplate:WikiProject TennesseeTennessee articles
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Virginia, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the U.S. state of Virginia on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.VirginiaWikipedia:WikiProject VirginiaTemplate:WikiProject VirginiaVirginia articles
There is consensus to split the section(s) about Florida into a separate article, in line with WP:SIZERULE and what has been done for other states' sections. No prejudice against cleaning up or trimming other content. As the article is currently fully protected, I will have to leave actually carrying out this split to another editor. Toadspike[Talk]09:49, 13 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
The article is currently 8,899 words and likely over 9,000 once words in tables are included. It’s at the point that my phone struggled to even load the page due to how long it was. As a result, I am proposing splitting off the Florida content, which has a lot of information for the preparations and impacts and is likely incomplete. Especially as this article is likely to grow in the aftermath, it is reasonable to consider trimming this down a bit. While Noah above explains that this is undue, I would like to disagree and say that the Florida section should be approximately in line with the South Carolina section, not the North Carolina one. SIZERULE recommends a split above 8,000 words and I don’t think this rises to a Katrina level storm where we keep it over 8,000. 74.101.118.218 (talk) 20:29, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This article doesn’t even mention any rainfall impacts for Florida, which there isn’t a ton of info for but I found this and this. As a result, the Florida section is still incomplete. Once expanded it will be a lot longer. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 74.101.118.218 (talk) 20:33, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Neutral - Florida section is quite long. Technically, article should be split per SIZERULE. However, this is an important topic that may warrant a long article. Wildfireupdateman (talk) 15:50, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose - trim the Georgia and North Carolina sections first, since they both have sub-articles, and shorten the Political response. There are 1300 words, which is a significant part of the article, but a lot of it reads like it was written in real time. "Biden spoke to a couple whose home had been destroyed by storm surge and discussed the impacts of the storm with local emergency management officials before returning to Perry where he boarded Marine One and then flew to Moody Air Force Base in Georgia." - this is pretty insignificant. The whole two paragraphs about Biden visiting damaged areas could be written in a few sentences. And the last paragraph:
"On October 7, NBC News reported that Florida Governor Ron DeSantis refused to take Vice President Kamala Harris' phone calls about storm recovery, according to an aide who claimed that DeSantis was avoiding talking to Harris because the calls "seemed political". In a press conference later that day DeSantis disputed the report saying that he didn't know Harris had called and said that he wasn't the one who was saying it was political. When Harris was asked about the report she did not deny it and without naming DeSantis directly accused the Florida Governor of "playing political games" in a moment of crisis and that it was "just utterly irresponsible".[369] DeSantis later appeared on Fox News where he said that Harris had "no role" in the recovery effort and said that she was the "first one who is trying to politicize the storm" and that she had done it because of her campaign for president."
Ugh that just seems so cringey to read at the end of a hurricane article, when this seems so trivial now. I don't think a separate Florida article would help much at this point, I just think the main article needs some tweaking. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:24, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Hi IP editor, apologies for the late reply. Here at Wikipedia, we are required to use reliable sources. We cannot add your suggestion without a source. Also, note that we may not add it if the information is too specific as this is a large article. ✶Quxyz✶14:16, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yeah, the discussion doesn't follow the storm's track as it was well east of the Atlanta area. The track on the page isn't very accurate.
I don't see discussion on the inaccuracy of the NHC's forecast. I'm in the utility business and follow storm forecasts regularly and this one was way off even as it was occurring. I can't recall seeing an NHC forecast so bad. Ventusky.com's chosen model was accurate days out, though I discounted it and relied on NHC to my detriment. See
The devastation line was (S-N) Valdosta, Douglas, Hazlehurst, Vidalia, Swainsboro, Augusta. Go 30 miles east of these cities and the damage dropped off significantly... no where near Atlanta. Granite03 (talk) 21:01, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Should the conspiracy theories have 1 or 2 sentences in the lead?
Support — As the editor in the disagreement who initially added the content, it if worth mentioning. The lead is support to mention a summary of the content in the article. A lot of the “Aftermath” section mentions conspiracy theories and things related to FEMA-related conspiracy theories. Heck, the split article for the conspiracy theories is linked at the top of the “Political response” section. So yes, to help summarize the article, I strongly believe a sentence or two should be given in the lead for the conspiracy theories/A.I.-generated content. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page)14:14, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Such a paragraph in the lead would be WP:UNDUE. At most, perhaps, a sentence stating that The storm generated much political and social media controversy. Drdpw (talk) 19:11, 10 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Zzzs: since you are determined to revert the content, I request you comment regarding it here. To note, Drdpw is not opposed to at least 1 sentence mentioning it. You seem to be reverting it entirely, so since you are currently the only editor (through reverts) set on removing it entirely from the lead, your thoughts are requested here. The Weather Event Writer (Talk Page)00:16, 11 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request.
Change "October 9 ( (later extended through October 28)" to "October 9 (later extended through October 28)" to fix the typo. I also recommend to mention that classes were made entirely remote and optional for the rest of the semester once classes returned on the 28th. Legority (talk) 01:34, 12 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
As we all know, Helene has already become the costliest (and probably even deadliest) tropical cyclone in the southeastern United States altogether. Most of the damage has been done in Florida, Georgia, and North Carolina, which already makes me believe that South Carolina would fall in second place in terms of damage (which it already has in fatalities). It would also make logical sense anyway to have effects articles for all the states in the southeast, as all have been hit extremely hard. Tennessee doesn't really deserve an article as the damage isn't nearly as great as surrounding states. Once there is a known damage value (if greater than $5 billion USD), I will start creating a draft. Iseriously (talk) 01:05, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
.svg){kind=small}
