Talk:Theatrhythm Final Fantasy: Curtain Call
Theatrhythm Final Fantasy: Curtain Call was nominated as a Video games good article, but it did not meet the good article criteria at the time (September 13, 2024, reviewed version). There are suggestions on the review page for improving the article. If you can improve it, please do; it may then be renominated. |
The following references may be useful when improving this article in the future:
|
|
Question about boxart
[edit]This article is using one boxart however retailers are using a completely different one[[1]]. Now I don't know if the retailers are using a outdated picture and this one is the correct on but if it's the other way around the current picture needs to be change since it would no longer be a image of the NA boxart.--67.68.162.111 (talk) 17:03, 22 July 2014 (UTC)
GA Review
[edit]GA toolbox |
---|
Reviewing |
- This review is transcluded from Talk:Theatrhythm Final Fantasy: Curtain Call/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.
Nominator: For Each element In group ... Next (talk · contribs) 16:50, 3 August 2024 (UTC)
Reviewer: Cukie Gherkin (talk · contribs) 18:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)
Infobox
- There is no citation that it released in Australia or when it did
- I did not find sources about the AU date; now I remove it.--For Each element In group ... Next 06:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
Lead
- The lead specifies that the button controls were implemented for public transport use, but the article does not specify this. I recommend either citing that specific claim in the other part of the article or changing it to match the comment about on-the-go gameplay.
- I changed both to "commutes to work or school".--For Each element In group ... Next 13:57, 2 September 2024 (UTC)
Release and marketing
- I would either recommend removing "Curtain Call was released on April 24 in Japan." or removing the announcement of the release date
Images
- Not a big deal, but I would recommend that the gameplay screenshot elaborated what it's meant to help the reader understand.
- What shall I do for this? Improve the image caption or use another picture?--For Each element In group ... Next 06:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- Oh no no, I just mean, say, adding something like that it shows the art style or the UI or something to that nature. The image is perfectly fine. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- What shall I do for this? Improve the image caption or use another picture?--For Each element In group ... Next 06:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
References
- I noticed that there's a ref idea on the talk page; is there any way you could access that and incorporate it (assuming it would be of use)?
- I am not in Japan and I did a search but found nothing. I'm not sure whether WP:RX is useful for a Japanese magazine or not, thus I left the ref idea on the talk page.--For Each element In group ... Next 06:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- It's no issue, I just wanted to make sure. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 14:49, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
- I am not in Japan and I did a search but found nothing. I'm not sure whether WP:RX is useful for a Japanese magazine or not, thus I left the ref idea on the talk page.--For Each element In group ... Next 06:45, 1 September 2024 (UTC)
@For Each element In group ... Next: Right now, my primary concerns are that I've had to adjust grammar and spelling a fair few times during my review of the article. I would recommend getting a second set of eyes to help do a peer review or copyedit of the article and renominate it. If needed, I can do the copyedit for you if I have time, but I would recommend renominating it after such a thing is done. I think you've done a lot of great work on the article from a glance, but it still needs more, and I don't think it can reasonably be done before the GAN is complete. However, if you believe that you can get it done in a week, I would be fine with keeping the review open. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 20:37, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
- Yes, you are right. I am currently learning English writing, so the nominated version represents my best effort at this stage. I agree that the article should be renominated once it has been improved in this part.
- Thanks for your review! For Each element In group ... Next 13:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)
- I understand, and I certainly don't want to discourage you at all. Like I said, once you've had another editor give it a once over to address grammar and spelling issues, hit me up. - Cukie Gherkin (talk) 18:50, 13 September 2024 (UTC)