Statue of Glenn McGrath is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.AustraliaWikipedia:WikiProject AustraliaTemplate:WikiProject AustraliaAustralia
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Sculpture, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Sculpture on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.SculptureWikipedia:WikiProject SculptureTemplate:WikiProject Sculpturesculpture
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Visual arts, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of visual arts on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Visual artsWikipedia:WikiProject Visual artsTemplate:WikiProject Visual artsvisual arts
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.
Glenn McGrath (statue) → Statue of Glenn McGrath – Per WP:VAMOS, which says, "For portrait sculptures of individuals in public places the forms "Statue of Fred Foo", "Equestrian statue of Fred Foo" or "Bust of Fred Foo" are recommended, unless a form such as "Fred Foo Memorial" or "Monument to Fred Foo" is the WP:COMMONNAME. If further disambiguation is needed, because there is more than one sculpture of the same person with an article, then disambiguation by location rather than the sculptor is usually better. This may be done as either "Statue of Fred Foo (Chicago)" (typically preferred for North America) or "Statue of Fred Foo, Glasgow" (typically preferred elsewhere). If the sculpture has a distinct common name, like the Bronze Horseman, that should be used." --Another Believer(Talk)16:05, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose (although support if the name isn't sourced), oppose move for generally the same reason I've opposed some others, that this is not a portrait sculpture but an action sculpture. Portrait opens with "A portrait is a painting, photograph, sculpture, or other artistic representation of a person, in which the face and its expressions are predominant." This statue is much more than the face and its expression, as it depicts a full body of a sportsman involved in his sport. Randy Kryn (talk) 23:57, 31 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Possible, and I agree if no name is sourced. But that's different than calling it a portrait statue. For example, the two statues of Mickey Mantle probably have full names but are not portrait statues (on one image it looks like the name is engraved in front but can only make out "The" which, if nicknames count, might refer to it being named "The Mick". Randy Kryn (talk) 23:34, 1 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
If that's the case then any painting or sculpture of a human doing anything would qualify as a portrait. This sculpture is of a sportsman in action dressed in uniform, and not just of a person or family in pose. I do agree that if the statue does not have a formal name then the "Statue of..." applies, just not that this one is a portrait. Randy Kryn (talk) 12:35, 2 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Support per nom. I disagree with Randy Kryn's narrow interpretation of WP:VAMOS's category of "portrait sculpture". The point of this limitation would be to distinguish sculptures that aren't predominantly about depicting an identified (or easily recognizable) person as that person (i.e., not just as a model), not that the face is more prominent than other parts. Otherwise, equestrian statues wouldn't be included. SilverLocust💬21:47, 7 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.