Jump to content

Talk:Slalom (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Good articleSlalom (video game) has been listed as one of the Video games good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do so. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can reassess it.
Good topic starSlalom (video game) is part of the Rare Replay series, a good topic. This is identified as among the best series of articles produced by the Wikipedia community. If you can update or improve it, please do so.
Article milestones
DateProcessResult
August 21, 2015Good article nomineeListed
August 2, 2016Good topic candidatePromoted
Did You Know
A fact from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the "Did you know?" column on August 10, 2011.
The text of the entry was: Did you know ... that Slalom was the first video game developed by UK-based video game company Rare?
Current status: Good article

Cleanup

[edit]

After a round of cleanup and a heated search for sources, I'm nominating this for GA. Let me know if there are any objections. – czar 23:49, 1 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

GA Review

[edit]
GA toolbox
Reviewing
This review is transcluded from Talk:Slalom (video game)/GA1. The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.

Reviewer: Tintor2 (talk · contribs) 20:19, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]


This looks like a very well done article. I would pass it already but there are some things I would like to change:

  • The lead is too short and fails WP:Lead. Expand it to at least two paragraphs and it may work.
  • The infobox references only date. I can see the development section already cites the other references so it should be mantained consistent.
  • The reference "Rare, ed. (1986), Slalom Instruction Booklet, Redmond, WA: Nintendo" looks a bit out of place. Seperate it from the others. I would suggest using Zero (Mega Man)#References as an example.

And that's all. Good work

  • @Tintor2, thanks for the review! What parts do you feel are missing from the lede? I thought it summarized the major points of Gameplay, Dev, and Reception. I think I got the other stuff, if you'll take a look. – czar 20:48, 20 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]