Talk:Rostov, Yaroslavl Oblast

Russia: History / Human geography Top‑importance

	Russia portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Russia, a WikiProject dedicated to coverage of Russia on Wikipedia. To participate: Feel free to edit the article attached to this page, join up at the project page, or contribute to the project discussion.RussiaWikipedia:WikiProject RussiaTemplate:WikiProject RussiaRussia articles
Top	This article has been rated as Top-importance on the project's importance scale.
	This article is supported by the history of Russia task force.
	This article is supported by the human geography of Russia task force.

On 11 September 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved from Rostov to Rostov, Yaroslavl Oblast. The result of the discussion was moved.

On 26 November 2023, it was proposed that this article be moved to Rostov. The result of the discussion was no consensus.

WW II -- Great Patriotic War -- Correction needed

The reference to the war and to the Battle of Rostov is mistaken in this context, since it relates to the other Rostov, Rostov-on-Don. It would seem that the Germans (who were approaching from the West and South) never got significantly past Moscow, much less 100 mi. or more to the Northeast. So what is there to say about Rostov's history in WW II instead? Mrnatural (talk) 06:54, 7 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rostofa

Somebody knows about name Rostofa? It is correct? I never see this information, only here.

IPAAT 18:38, 1 April 2006 (UTC)Ipaat[reply]

This is from Tatiana Jackson's book about Norse place-names in Russia. I may supply appropriate citation when I get home. Anyway, I plan to rewrite this article sooner or later. Cheers, Ghirla ^-трёп- 09:13, 3 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I really don't understand the reason you put here the name of the town in Old Norse. Why not Swahili? If you think that town was founded by scandinavians, please, prove it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 77.165.173.131 (talk) 17:51, 21 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Rostofa

Thanks, I see all famous Russian encyclopaedia (from Dal to KM) and - nothing about this.

IPAAT 09:16, 3 April 2006 (UTC)Ipaat[reply]

Because it's fake and comes from some fantasies. Honesly, are you rely on wikipedia as a source of information??

Monk Nestor and his "Povest Vremennyh Let"

At Beloozero were Vepsäs, At Rostov ozero Merjas and also at Kleshino ozero are Merjas too. And along the Oka River, where it flows to Volga are their own language talking Muromas, and also their own language talking Tseremisses and Mordovians.

Slavonic language speakers in Rus are Poljans, Drevljans, Polotskians, Dregovitshes, Severjanes and Buzans. The Buzans have received their name from that they formely used to live along Buga River, but later they have been started to called Volhynians. The Novgorodians are added into the list only later in later versions.

Others, who pay tributes for Rus are Tshuds, Merjas, Vepsäs, Muromas, Tseremisses, Mordvas, Permas, Petshoras, Hämes, Littis, Zimigolas, Korsas, Narovas, Liivis. All these talk their own languages, they are the descendats of Jaafet, and who lives in the northern countries.

A.O. Ishimova: "Istorija Rossii v razskazah dlja mladshago vozrasta" Second edition by publishing house M.O.Wolff, Moscow 1866: The eldest towns of Finns were: Rostov, Muroma and Beloozero. The Slavs, in addition to Kiova, had other towns: Novgorod, Polotsk and Smolensk. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 88.114.205.131 (talk) 08:09, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on Rostov. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20120327005204/http://www.admrostov.ru/msu.php?doc=3 to http://www.admrostov.ru/msu.php?doc=3

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 12:11, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion

The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for deletion:

Coat of Arms of Yaroslavl Oblast (2011) full.svg

Participate in the deletion discussion at the nomination page. —Community Tech bot (talk) 15:31, 6 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Source for Scythians?

The article says " Scythians also settled there.", but there is no source provided for this claim. Rostov is in the forest-zone, and outside of the known settlement areas of the Scythians. Is it possible that the author of this part mistaken info about Rostov-on-Don to info about Rostov? Scythians were abundant around the Sea of Azov. Slumbery (talk) 14:07, 28 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 11 September 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: moved. Consensus established to move Rostov to Rostov, Yaroslavi Oblast, and redirect Rostov to Rostov-on-Don per PRIMARY. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 00:54, 19 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Rostov → Rostov, Yaroslavl Oblast
Rostov (disambiguation) → Rostov

– There's a good chance that this isn't the primary topic; see Rostov-on-Don. Move the dabpage to the basename per WP:NOPRIMARY. 162 etc. (talk) 06:02, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support, as this is an improvement. But the subject is also known as Rostov the Great/Rostov Velikii/Rostov Velikiy (Ngram). And I would definitely consider Rostov-on-Don as the primary topic for the name on its own. —Michael Z. 14:28, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No objection to making Rostov a primary redirect to Rostov-on-Don, if other editors support that. 162 etc. (talk) 15:36, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rostov-on-Don as PRIMARY.--Ortizesp (talk) 18:37, 11 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Requested move 26 November 2023

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: no consensus. Based on arguments, more users support the move than oppose it, and their arguments seem to be more persuasive and supported by evidence. However, the consensus is not very clear or strong, as there are also valid arguments against the move.

I'd suggest to consider the possibility of finding a compromise solution, such as using a natural disambiguator or a hatnote, that can satisfy both sides. (closed by non-admin page mover) Vanderwaalforces (talk) 08:07, 5 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Rostov, Yaroslavl Oblast → Rostov – The previous move mightily screwed upo Wikipedia. Rostov-on-Don and Rostov are completely different names and should not be confused. For starters, Rostov is 500 years older than Rostov-on-Don and the move disruptedd a huge number of historical articles: Rostov has half-ythousand of incoming links. The move also introduced confusion it lots of bio articles. Rostov the Great and similar (screwed-up by renaming bot) is a nickname to historically great Rostov, not Rostov-on-Don. etc. This is a huge mistake to muve page with long-established usage and with huge number of links. - Altenmann >talk 21:25, 26 November 2023 (UTC) — Relisting. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 15:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Comment Historical age is not a factor when determining a primary topic; see WP:DPT. If broken wikilinks are a problem, then the solution is to fix them, not to rename the article. 162 etc. (talk) 22:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment the issue is not age, the issue is that the move screwed up a huge number of backlinks. - Altenmann >talk 23:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Broken links are no reason to move an article. See WP:AT. You can be WP:BOLD and simply fix them. Nothing in this proposal suggests that Rostov, Yaroslavl Oblast is the primary topic. Oppose. 162 etc. (talk) 04:34, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  YEs 500 broken links after move means that the page should not be moved. - Altenmann >talk 04:56, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  Typically, wikilinks are updated as part of the RM closure; see WP:POSTMOVE. @Robertsky: It appears that this may have been overlooked. 162 etc. (talk) 05:16, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  @162 etc., indeed I may have overlooked this. Will look into this this couple of weeks. – robertsky (talk) 08:12, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  
  @162 etc., @Altenmann, done clean up on the links. – robertsky (talk) 12:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  I have to say one thing though... unlike other requested moves that required me to clean up wikilinks in the hundreds (i.e. Australian), and invariably having to replace the original link with one of multiple possibilities, all the links here have been pointing to this article. – robertsky (talk) 12:55, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nomination. Ymblanter (talk) 22:22, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

oppose not convinced that rostov-on-don isn't the primary topic. It is a larger more prominent city and the admin centre of the rostov oblast—blindlynx 22:41, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It does not matter that it is larger: it has a very different name. And you have yet to prove that it is commonly called as "Rostov". - Altenmann >talk 23:02, 26 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You're the one proposing this move not me. But the Rostov-on-Don article uses 'Rostov-on-Don' and 'Rostov' interchangeable; The oblast isn't named the 'Rostov-on-Don Oblast; obviously a search won't be particularly useful but news agency use just 'rostov' in recent articles clearly about rostov-on-don [1], [2], [3]—blindlynx 00:43, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I would rather see how the literature overall refers to the city rather than recent breaking news reports (WP:RECENTISM) which still refer to the city as Rostov-on-Don initially in those examples. Mellk (talk) 20:38, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

i'm having a hard time finding good data on this simply because searches for 'rostov' lead to a lot of hits for Rostov-on-Don. Advice would be appreciated—blindlynx 00:29, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support. Almost nowhere you'll find Rostov-on-Don being referred as Rostov. If Reuters did it, it's the jornalist's fault. Despite not being the centre of the oblast, Rostov has a great importance among Russian cities, being a spiritual and cultural tourist destination. Even in Russian Wikipedia the article is Ростов, albeit its southern counterpart being searched twice as much. ―Eduardogobi (talk) 20:05, 27 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Both this article and the one in russian say that 'Ростов Великий' 'great rostov' is used colloquially...but this isn't russian wiki so all this has limited bearing on this discussion—blindlynx 00:34, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Why not move to Rostov Veliky or Rostov the Great?[4] Natural disambiguation is best. —Michael Z. 00:33, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Oppose. Rostov-on-Don can be and is also referred to as Rostov and is the primary topic. It would be incomplete disambiguation even if it were not (in which case we would turn Rostov into a disambiguation page). Claims that it's a "very different name" are, of course, ludicrous. It's just Rostov with a bit tacked on the end. It's no more "different" than Stratford, London and Stratford-upon-Avon. -- Necrothesp (talk) 13:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Support: The arguments that "Rostov-on-Don" is the primary topic are not convincing. These are different entities; best not to create the confusion. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 00:42, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
- Even if it's not the primary topic, moving this article would still create incomplete disambiguation, as Rostov-on-Don can be and is also referred to as Rostov. -- Necrothesp (talk) 16:38, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
  - This can be addressed with a hatnote. -- K.e.coffman (talk) 04:05, 11 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Note: WikiProject Russia has been notified of this discussion. -- Maddy from Celeste (WAVEDASH) 15:44, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Support Rostov is far more famous with larger significance. There already is a commonly-used natural disambiguator (Rostov-on-Don). Any remaining ambiguity can be resolved with a hatnote. Walrasiad (talk) 19:15, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
~~Weak~~ support. I have not really seen the city Rostov-on-Don referred to as just Rostov before. Google is not useful here but the results returned still typically include Rostov-on-Don rather than just Rostov to refer to the city. It is probably somewhat similar with Veliky Novgorod which is often just known as Novgorod (which redirects to there) while Novgorod is rarely used to refer to Nizhny Novgorod, probably only erroneously. Mellk (talk) 20:03, 9 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose per Necrothesp. --Yorkporter (talk) 22:10, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose. No evidence that this Rostov is the primary use of the term, and simple internet searches for 'Rostov' rank Rostov-on-Don higher, indicating that it is the primary topic[5][6][7]. Celia Homeford (talk) 09:04, 3 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.