Talk:Prius Online

Korea Mid‑importance

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Korea, a collaborative effort to build and improve articles related to Korea. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how use this banner, please refer to the documentation.KoreaWikipedia:WikiProject KoreaTemplate:WikiProject KoreaKorea-related
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Controversy

I think the word "Controversy" is so strong. that sad story could happen with any other online game addiction. I think sth similar to "story highlight" is better and more neutral.--Nata 99 (talk) 18:19, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

"Story highlight" is meaningless. What story is it highlighting, exactly? This is an article about a game, and the section is about something that happened because of the game. I think controversy suits it much better. Aiken ♫ 18:37, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

What about "stories" or "scandals"? I want a neutral word but I cant remember a good word.--Nata 99 (talk) 19:04, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Incidents? Aiken ♫ 19:10, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

OK :-) --Nata 99 (talk) 19:11, 21 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Neutrality

i don't even have to be a wiki user to know this thing is just an advertisement. make it neutral. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 108.12.96.247 (talk) 19:19, 17 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I second this.--97.96.26.245 (talk) 10:39, 21 April 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I third this. --Seduisant (talk) 03:29, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Notification for removal of information.

I challenge the importance of most of the information in this article. For an English-speaking audience, the only thing of importance is the death of the child resulting from an addiction to the game.

A huge, uncited description of a now defunct game is completely needless.Hilltrot (talk) 19:23, 31 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]