Talk:Monzo (video game)

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Ada Wong (nom)
Raichu (nom)

Good article nominations

Donkey Kong (start)
Puff-puff (Dragon Quest) (start)
Sorceress (Dragon's Crown) (start)
Hyper Duel (start)
Gengar (start)
Leifang (start)
Megamania (start)
Barry Burton (start)
Tina Armstrong (start)
Geno (Super Mario RPG) (nom)
Birdo (nom)
Rayman (video game) (nom)
Shin Megami Tensei V (start)
Iron Soldier (start)
Alex Thach (start)
Protector (Atari Jaguar video game) (nom)
Aperture Tag (start)
Justin Yu (start)
Theatrhythm Final Fantasy: Curtain Call (start)
Thinking with Time Machine (start)
Kim Kitsuragi (start)
Miner 2049er (start)
Pokémon Sword and Shield (start)
Mario Party: The Top 100 (start)
Until Then (nom)

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

The Legend of Zelda: Majora's Mask (nom)
Pokémon Channel (nom)
Undertale (rev)
The Sims 4 (rev)
Dr Disrespect (rev)

Articles that need...

Czech Republic Low‑importance

	Czech Republic portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Czech Republic, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the Czech Republic on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Czech RepublicWikipedia:WikiProject Czech RepublicTemplate:WikiProject Czech RepublicCzech Republic articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Requested move 25 August 2016

Move as there has been no serious objections to this and there's fair enough to suggest it can happen. SwisterTwister talk 06:11, 2 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The following discussion is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

Monzo → Monzo (video game) – Monzo as a name is being used by a popular up and coming UK bank. This page does not seem like it should be the primary topic for the word. I would instead suggest we move this article to include "(video game)" to make it clear that this article concerns the game and then create a disambiguation page. The article for the bank already includes "(bank)". There is an existing redirect at the proposed target to this article. Adam williams (talk) 21:00, 25 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Support. As of yesterday's name change there is no clear primary topic for this term. The app is not particularly notable, nor does it receive much traffic. —Xezbeth (talk) 11:54, 26 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Support. Monzo cannot be seen as a WP:PTOPIC. Makes sense. soetermans. ^{↑↑↓↓←→←→ B A TALK} 05:56, 28 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose "a popular up and coming foo" = WP:RECENTISM. — SMcCandlish ☺ ☏ ¢ ≽^ʌⱷ҅_ᴥⱷ^ʌ≼ 21:11, 30 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Thanks for your thoughts on this, I can see where you're coming from. I find it curious you've aired your concerns here, however. If your concern is that Monzo (bank) is not notable enough to have an article, is it not worth suggesting it via Wikipedia:Articles for deletion? There are plenty of references on the bank's article and on https://monzo.com/press/ to establish notability. If your concern is that this topic is too recent and may not pass the "ten year test", I would respectfully disagree - even if the startup does fail (and hey, most startups do!), I think the history of the company and its notability at the time means that historical description of what the company aimed to do and what went wrong would still be of interest in ten years.On the other hand, if the company does succeed then it will be a worthy addition to Wikipedia for other reasons. Do you think this article (for the video game) would qualify under WP:PTOPIC? What would you suggest doing instead? Adam williams (talk) 20:53, 31 August 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.