Talk:MonsterMMORPG

This article was nominated for deletion. Please review the prior discussions if you are considering re-nomination:

no consensus, 11 April 2015, see discussion.
delete, 16 January 2012, see discussion.

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted on 3 April 2015 by reviewer Oo7565 (talk · contribs).

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game articles

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Featured content candidates

Good article nominations

DYK nominations

No did you know nominations

Reviews and reassessments

Articles that need...

Ok I need help about modifying this page properly

References list

I would suggest reading Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources and Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Sources for guidelines on the sites that we find valuable. I removed about 2/3 of the "sources" as they were game linkfarm landing pages, user reviews, and sources that we have found to be specifically unreliable. There were also quite a few exceptional/self-serving claims sourced to interviews, which are considered self-published sources for our purposes here, so I removed them. The article is closer to WP:VG guidelines and would probably survive a deletion discussion. It could still use some cleanup, though. Woodroar (talk) 01:08, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Contested deletion

This page should not be speedily deleted because... (your reason here)

Wow this article were checked by many helpers at the chat, they all approved, all suggestions made by them applied, submitted as draft approved, reviewed by editor approved, then i go ask chat about editor review and now primefac tags it as speed deletion, even coffee checked the article when i was preparing draft at the chat. And i believe it has way more authority references than other same category games. I just want to say please check other articles here for references should we speedy delete all of them? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_multiplayer_browser_games , https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/List_of_browser_games . Please check talk page for all references. Just one example : https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Tanki_Online --OnlineGamesExpert (talk) 10:55, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Overturned G4

You've been blocked for harassing (meaning: mass-posting on various uninvolved admins' talk pages) as well as e-mailing them (you e-mailed me, I can't be the only one), as well as displaying a generally combative attitude towards Bbb23. Nonetheless, I think the article needs to be judged on its own merits (and not on who wrote it), and I find that the latest revision has vastly different sourcing that the version AfD's three years ago, which (IMO) makes it inelegible for G4 deletion "per previous discussion". I have restored it (and it will surely shortly be sent to a new AfD, where it may or may not be deleted again). ☺ · Salvidrim! · ✉ 18:02, 11 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]