Talk:iSketch

This article was nominated for deletion. Review prior discussions if considering re-nomination:

Keep, 2 February 2023, see discussion.
keep, 30 December 2006, see discussion.

This page is not a forum for general discussion about iSketch. Any such comments may be removed or refactored. Please limit discussion to improvement of this article. You may wish to ask factual questions about iSketch at the Reference desk.

Video games Low‑importance

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of video games on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.Video gamesWikipedia:WikiProject Video gamesTemplate:WikiProject Video gamesvideo game

Low

This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks:

Summary of Video games WikiProject open tasks

AfDs

Gameplay of Pokémon (4 participants)
Lisette Titre-Montgomery (4 participants)
Party royale game (3 participants)
List of Minecraft characters (7 participants)
Carlton Wilborn (5 participants)
Cossacks (video games series) (2 participants; relisted)
Rat Race (video game) (7 participants; relisted)
Red Barrels (3 participants; relisted)

Merge discussions

Other discussions

No major discussions

Gallery link?

What's with the asterisk before the 'Gallery' link? Should the link be on a seperate bullet because it isn't really a community per se. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Cre8tor (talk • contribs) 13:10, 10 May 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Yo Cre. You are correct, sir. Fixed.--Father Goose 17:19, 10 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Stub article?

By definition, a stub is an article containing only a few sentences of text which is too short to provide encyclopedic coverage of a subject, but not so short as to provide no useful information. Does this article meet this classification? Netscope 18:26, 20 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Article maintenance September 2014

Hey there. I did a bunch of work on this article, so I just wanted to briefly summarize what I did and what changes are still needed (and which I don't have time or expertise to do right now):

Reduced the lead to a couple of sentences describing the site and briefly summarizing its history and implementation.
Moved details about how to play the game into a new Gameplay section.
Condensed details about community moderation to a simplified Moderation section.
Removed the extensive list of languages, rooms and variants - WP is not an instruction manual or an indiscriminate collection of information.
Removed the "Issues" section - one issue ("Server is full") was not really a technical problem, and is a fact of life for most any online game. The other (cheating/"griefing") has been neatly rolled up into Moderation.
Removed first-party references, as they were both unnecessary and were harming the article's integrity. While the information in the article that was referenced is true, WP relies on secondary and tertiary reliable sources for verifiability.
Changed the {{third-party}} template to {{refimprove}} - we now have only one citation (the Alexa rank, which I'm sure is out of date now).
Removed the forum-style sections from this Talk page - they are years out of date and are not relevant to improving the article.

We still need the following:

Development notes as cited from reliable third-party sources.
Reception information, again cited from reliable sources.
Proper citations for existing content.
A scrub through content that is likely to change with time, such as the Alexa rank.

Anyone willing to take that on? Thanks. — KieferSkunk (talk) — 20:40, 1 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

External links modified

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on ISketch. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 22:31, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposal for deletion

Article cites no notable sources, and I can't find any new sources. There was a previous debate in 2006 (see here, but all of those sources cited as reasons to keep the article don't seem to exist any more. --HotSection (talk) 17:28, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Clone?

Check this: https://skribbl.io/ DonRolfo (talk) 15:59, 10 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]