Jump to content

Talk:Huxley (video game)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit]

Removed the IJJI link, as they are no longer a part of the project and the link no longer worked. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Shmargin (talk • contribs) 05:03, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Article Name

[edit]

Should the title of this article not be "Huxley (MMOFPS)" or "Huxley (Computer Game)"? --Hardgoodbye 01:23, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Computer game wouldn't work as there is an X-Box 360 version coming out as well. MMOFPS is a lesser known term so that would not work either. I think "Huxley (video game)" is our best option. Greeves (talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I would suggest "MMOFPS video game." MMOFPS isn't as cryptic a designation as it was a few years ago - with games like World of Warcraft so popular, people are familiar with the MMO- abbreviation. The "MMOFPS" part is an important designation to apply to this game, since that is what sets it apart from every other FPS out there and is the main thrust of the game.--CBrewster 14:51, 27 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

-We need to stop having the page change everyday, if someone puts something that has good information on it. Keep It! -Who ever recently changed the Huxley release date back to 2007, has false hope. The webzengames.com page is outdated, all recent data points to a Q1-Q2 2008 release date. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.225.15 (talk) 19:04, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It may be incorrect info, but it's verifiable. It bears mentioning because it is the official developers site. I wouldn't call it wishfull thinking but following WP:NOR BURNyA 19:21, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thats dumb though, we know its not coming 2007. We know that page isnt updated, and we even have there finical report that says that it will be coming Q1-Q2 2008. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.225.15 (talk) 19:00, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The financial report is mentioned in the article. If Huxley is that worried about it, let Webzen know that there is a typo and then we can remove the "within 2007" from the article. It would seem that a company that is trying to release a breakthrough game would have an up to date website, so perhaps they are considering the Beta a 'Korea pre-release' or something stupid. Don't know, and it doesn't make a lot of sense. I'll try to email them today. BURNyA 19:14, 12 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Huxley Wikipedia page, cleaned up. Please keep it this way! ~4/7/08 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.10.225.15 (talk) 01:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brave New World

[edit]

Where is it documented that this game is based on A Brave New World?

It's been discussed by the developers "Also, Aldous Huxley's 1932 novel Brave New World served as the inspiration for the game's name, gave us ideas in planning a world concerning the game's overall social and class structure." http://xbox360.ign.com/articles/704/704750p1.html Croryf 08:29, 7 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

"Inspired by", not "based on". The actual game seems to have no relation to Huxley's novel. A resemblance between the "overall social and class structure" of the two games is a very weak argument for a similarity. The class structure of Huxley's novel wasn't particularly original or unique. For example, Gattaca's page doesn't discuss Brave New World anywhere. We may as well say that the Huxley video game is based on The Communist Manifesto. --Heyitspeter 04:03, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

The external links section in this article is massive! We need to get rid of some of those fan sites; one or two fan sites at the most! Greeves (talk • contribs) 15:22, 20 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed. Feel free to get started. Modul8r 16:07, 18 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I've been taking all of the fansite links down. There's two sites whose members tend to use wikipedia to pester each other via vandalism, and it's become a pain. If noone objects, I'm going to continue to just leave the official links unless a fansite gives important verifiable info that can't be found elsewhere, or at least has substance beyond "this will be our clan one day, and we're gonna pownerz you". BURNyA 18:39, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Pricing

[edit]

ijji. Free to play.

(not) WP:NOT

[edit]

I dont think this article sounds like an avertisment at all. I'm taking the flag down if noone objects. BURNyA 21:21, 27 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

[edit]

There's been alot of vandalism on this page from the fan forums. I think that if it continues, this may need to be semi protected until the beta comes out and they have another place to send their attention. BURNyA 19:33, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Only a couple of hours after I posted this and it's still going on. BURNyA 22:01, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Huxley SapienFrontOfTank.jpg.jpg

[edit]

Image:Huxley SapienFrontOfTank.jpg.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 17:23, 2 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Beginning text

[edit]

The beginning text isn't quite in wikipedia style. Contralya (talk) 22:44, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Redo

[edit]

This whole article is currently in the tank! It is hardly in wikipedia format and the text is not as encyclopedic it should be. It talks about a TRAILER as if it were something seen in the game. Anyone who has seen video game advertisements and got the game knows that cinematic trailers do NOT represent game-play. 65.27.139.162 (talk) 22:53, 14 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Screen sapiens fighting alternative Huxley.jpg

[edit]

Image:Screen sapiens fighting alternative Huxley.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:37, 21 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly free2play

[edit]

There was an article on www.gamespy.com that speculates this game may be released as a free2play. http://pc.gamespy.com/pc/huxley/878392p1.html Flem12 (talk) 23:35, 2 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

MMO? Number of players isn't matching up

[edit]

Games Radar

Page 3 says the largest PvP map for release will be 20v20 players. That's 40 people. The gameplay section should be changed to reflect this. Not sure where these 60v60 figures are coming from. They probably have no research behind them or are very out of date. Someone should research this if they care. I won't make the change, just passing this along. 141.218.136.207 (talk) 19:07, 9 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]


IF no one objects, I am going to remove every instance of MMO from this article, as this game hasn't been planned as mmo for a long time. I have taken a look at other games featuring only 64 players and none of them call themselves an MMO fps, wolfenstein: enemy territory for example. Yea sure the plans were for an mmofps but that has been cancelled as the article rightly states due to engine and cost issues etc so the game will just be a normal online fps. 86.134.41.189 (talk) 23:48, 13 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

out dated

[edit]

it says it was released q4 2008 in korea but it hasnt aswell as oter info —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.145.41.88 (talk) 18:36, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Xbox 360 Version basically cancelled

[edit]

http://g4tv.com/thefeed/blog/post/694359/360-Version-of-Huxley-Put-on-Hold.html —Preceding unsigned comment added by 96.3.141.210 (talk) 19:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Weapons

[edit]

I noticed the weapons section of the page was incredibly outdated. The previous section said that there were only seven types of weapons, when there are really nine. It also said that the discharger (flamethrower) is a "rumored weapon", when it was in fact confirmed to be in the game. The other weapon the section was mission was the Enforcer's Flinger.

I've updated the page to have the current confirmed information about the weapons in the game. I put a lot of information there. If anyone feels that it is too much information and that all of it isn't really needed, feel free to delete any unnecessary information. 75.69.199.57 (talk) 06:07, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Release Date

[edit]

It seems like the date for this game keeps being changed. It has not been announced yet, and is definitely not "Thursday @ 6:66" —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.110.9.130 (talk) 02:45, 7 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Gameplay Section Changes

[edit]

Since we've had two closed betas and a three-day open test, I've completely revamped the Gameplay section based on the facts we now know about the game. 66.31.147.246 (talk) 07:13, 21 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I redid the skill section to the most up to date information (65.2.243.157 (talk) 18:05, 21 February 2010 (UTC)).[reply]

Experience and Leveling section needs changes.

[edit]

The current system for Huxley is based around levels and license points. Every level you are given one license point but every rank up you are given 3 with the exception of S rank which gives 5 license points. There are 30 levels which have ranks based on S being level 30. A being level 20. B being level 10 and C being level 0-10. Battlepoints are the name of the experience gained during combat for killing npc's or players. Battlefunds are the money used within the game although in the Frontier Test they added a new system for the repair system for armor and gear that used a seperate kind of points(Don't think they had a name). There is also lunarites used to add a random upgrade to armor and gear which can be recieved through PvE occassionally or pvp within skirmishes. (65.2.243.157 (talk) 18:30, 21 February 2010 (UTC))[reply]

just a question

[edit]

when is this coming out for sure because i have seen multiple dates and the are all different and i would like to know where i can find it. — Preceding unsigned comment added by H3l10k1ttyyy (talk • contribs) 18:51, 14 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 2 external links on Huxley (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:39, 7 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 6 external links on Huxley (video game). Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}} (last update: 5 June 2024).

  • If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
  • If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.

Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 02:10, 2 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Talk:Huxley_(video_game)&oldid=1202857033"