Jump to content

Talk:Filthy (song)

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Category:Cultural depictions of Steve Jobs?

[edit]

Is Category:Cultural depictions of Steve Jobs really applicable? Sure, perhaps inspired by Jobs, but not really a depiction of him, right? ---Another Believer (Talk) 20:40, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

All the publications I've read say he "channels Steve Jobs", "Steve Jobs-like". This one says "dressed as Steve Jobs." It's in-between. Cornerstonepicker (talk) 08:54, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
But dressing "like" someone is not depicting them. The music video is not about Jobs. I've removed the category for now, and we can always add back if consensus dictates inclusion. ---Another Believer (Talk) 15:51, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 7 January 2018

[edit]
The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the move request was: not moved. (closed by page mover) GeoffreyT2000 (talk) 04:05, 15 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]


Filthy (song)Filthy – This may come as somewhat of a surprise, but there does not seem to be another subject called "Filthy" on Wikipedia, not even on the dab page for "Filth". JE98 (talk) 21:00, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is a contested technical request (permalink). Anthony Appleyard (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@Another Believer: my apologies, I read 'upcoming studio album'. I'll strike that, but I think the most sensible thing here is to wait and see the coverage that the song gets. st170e 23:08, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
@St170e: No worries, and sounds good! ---Another Believer (Talk) 23:09, 7 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
changing to Oppose per User:SNUGGUMS, and because Filthy! is relevant, terminal punctuation is too-small a SMALLDETAIL. —SmokeyJoe (talk) 04:53, 13 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page or in a move review. No further edits should be made to this section.

2nd week fall to no.29

[edit]

it fell to number 29 in its second week in the US