Talk:Disney Fairies
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Disney Fairies article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. |
Article policies
|
Find video game sources: "Disney Fairies" – news · newspapers · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images · free news sources · TWL · NYT · WP reference · VG/RS · VG/RL · WPVG/Talk |
This article is rated C-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale. It is of interest to the following WikiProjects: | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
The contents of the Pixie Hollow page were merged into Disney Fairies. For the contribution history and old versions of the redirected page, please see its history; for the discussion at that location, see its talk page. |
Asuka Jun
[edit]Maybe something should be mentioned about Asuka Jun's Fairies spinoff in the Japanese magazine Nakayoshi Raburii? (58.188.97.134 11:24, 14 February 2007 (UTC))
The ISBN's are all wrong —Preceding unsigned comment added by 209.235.16.36 (talk) 22:27, 12 March 2008 (UTC)
Here is the tokyopop link to the english version of that manga http://www.tokyopop.com/product/1904/Fairies/1 But then there is also a manga by Haruhi Kato that is directly based off the english chapter books. Here is the link to the englihs version of that http://www.tokyopop.com/product/2702/Fairies/1 Shouldn't we add these in? Mew Mitsuki (talk) 18:40, 12 November 2008 (UTC)
- Those two links are dead so will link archives for those curious:
- Asuka Jun version
- This later redirects to http://www.facebook.com/TOKYOPOP/product/1904/Fairies/1
- Haruhi Kato version
- Later directs to http://www.facebook.com/TOKYOPOP/product/2702/Fairies/1
- Asuka Jun version
- Hope this helps 174.92.133.112 (talk) 14:17, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Fairydustcover.jpg
[edit]Image:Fairydustcover.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 05:49, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
Descent
[edit]Someone just edited this article to describe one of the fairies as "of African descent". I'm no export, but do fairies even have descent? Do they have ancestors? Maybe something like "African appearance" would be better. DJ Clayworth (talk) 15:27, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- The version of the Fairies' origin that Disney is using says that they're each born from the first laugh of a baby, and these fairies found their way to Never Land. One might suppose that fairies created by African babies have African features. "African origin" might be a good way to express this. - JasonAQuest (talk) 17:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)
- I've decided to make the change to "appearance". No offence intended if someone thinks this is wrong for some reason. DJ Clayworth (talk) 21:40, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
- I'd say that's a great choice of words: captures the facts perfectly. - JasonAQuest (talk) 01:53, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
yes appearance sounds much better as there not humans or even alive there animted characters but children watch them so they have appearances of humans races and ethnics.
P.S i also added "of African appearance" to lily shes not in the films but is in the books and she clearly looks like a black or mixed race girl, and also fira is tanned olive skinned is she asian (indian) or hispanic i just wondered coz i love her she is soo beautiful and should be in the films like lily —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.22.199.25 (talk) 00:56, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
Fairies
[edit]I propose making an article titled "List of characters in Disney Fairies". The way the character section in this article looks is kinda messy. Telemachus Claudius Rhade (talk) 14:16, 8 May 2009 (UTC)
- I agree. I believe that the seven core fairies listed can stay, but the rest should be moved to an article like the one you mentioned.
Lost Treasure film
[edit]I just saw an ad on Disney Spanish channel that this film is "solo en cines" - is that dependent on the territories ? Or might that also apply to the US, too ? -- Beardo (talk) 03:02, 1 September 2009 (UTC)
Pixie Hollow
[edit]Pixie Hollow currently redirects to the website's section. However, I think it is also the name of some attractions in Disney Parks. Anyone with enough information can split the article to an attraction one? I can help with fixing links to the website section. --LoЯd ۞pεth 04:18, 12 January 2011 (UTC)
Characters
[edit]I hate to be the grinch here, but the list of characters has gone beyond verifiable sources, past original research, and (I fear) into creative writing with some help with the DF web site's "create your own fairy" feature. The bunch of "Newest Fairy In Pixie Hollow"s, for example. The best solution I can see is to apply Wikipedia policy: require that every fairy listed have the source identified: the book or movie she/he appears in. It doesn't have to be properly formatted citation, just the title, to allow someone to verify it if they wish. And to make it work, we'll have to cut the list all the way down and start over, because it's way too easy to just let these potentially made-up names stay where they are. -Jason A. Quest (talk) 00:58, 19 April 2011 (UTC)
- I agree with this statement. example who is Glowery Bell? She's not in any movie that I can tell. Also the description for her is not written very well. It's confusing. I would like a source for her because I think she might be fan made. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.10.97.189 (talk) 04:12, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
- This article seems like a prime spot for fanfic vandalism, I suspect that's what this is, overly creative contributors. -- Zanimum (talk) 18:45, 15 October 2012 (UTC)
This is still happening, big time. Abby, the fairy who 'might' have more than one talent? Crystal, the fairy with a MERMAID sister? — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2602:306:35CC:3270:E41D:F9C:228C:BD63 (talk) 00:11, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Adventures TV series on Junior
[edit]Made a section about this but need more data. Does this exist only in UK and Asia but not US? What is it, a port of the films in episodic format or something? 174.92.133.112 (talk) 14:08, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
- This is not an original series, but it is only the first five Tinker Bell films cut into 13 episodes: http://tv.twcc.com/tv/adventures-of-disney-fairies/7863195. --Carniolus (talk) 17:42, 20 October 2015 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just added archive links to 2 external links on Disney Fairies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add {{cbignore}}
after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add {{nobots|deny=InternetArchiveBot}}
to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061027002438/https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=lobDetail&lobId=publishing to https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=lobDetail&lobId=publishing
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/20061027015538/https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=pressReleaseDetail&contentId=293471&returnLayout=pressReleaseArchives&year=2005&articleSort=date to https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=pressReleaseDetail&contentId=293471&returnLayout=pressReleaseArchives&year=2005&articleSort=date
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.
An editor has reviewed this edit and fixed any errors that were found.
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—cyberbot IITalk to my owner:Online 22:49, 16 January 2016 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 3 external links on Disney Fairies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061027015538/https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=pressReleaseDetail&contentId=293471&returnLayout=pressReleaseArchives&year=2005&articleSort=date to https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=pressReleaseDetail&contentId=293471&returnLayout=pressReleaseArchives&year=2005&articleSort=date
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061027002438/https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=lobDetail&lobId=publishing to https://licensing.disney.com/Login/displayContent.do?layout=lobDetail&lobId=publishing
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20111017213146/http://disney.go.com/fairies/pixie-hollow-world.html to http://disney.go.com/fairies/pixie-hollow-world.html
When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true or failed to let others know (documentation at {{Sourcecheck}}
).
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 23:14, 13 December 2016 (UTC)
Talents
[edit]All of Disney's fairies have a talent; maybe a new section should be added listing the talents. Or I feel like adding a list of all the talents might make the article appear messy so maybe just a section to state the most mentioned/popular talents in the Disney Fairies franchise? SL98 (talk) 04:21, 23 January 2017 (UTC)
External links modified
[edit]Hello fellow Wikipedians,
I have just modified 5 external links on Disney Fairies. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116213427/http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/media/article/561728/egmont-unveils-disney-fairies-magazine-uk/ to http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/media/article/561728/egmont-unveils-disney-fairies-magazine-uk/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110929005738/http://www.mouseinfo.com/content.php?r=309-DISNEY-AND-CELEBRITY-HAIR-STYLIST-KEN-PAVES-ANNOUNCE-CREATIVE-COLLABORATION-FOR-DISNEY-FAIRIES to http://www.mouseinfo.com/content.php?r=309-DISNEY-AND-CELEBRITY-HAIR-STYLIST-KEN-PAVES-ANNOUNCE-CREATIVE-COLLABORATION-FOR-DISNEY-FAIRIES
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20100518104309/http://promomagazine.com/interactivemarketing/news/1024-tinker-bell-online-home/ to http://promomagazine.com/interactivemarketing/news/1024-tinker-bell-online-home/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130916082429/http://disney.go.com/fairies/pixie-hollow/closing/ to http://disney.go.com/fairies/pixie-hollow/closing/
- Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20061116213427/http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/media/article/561728/egmont-unveils-disney-fairies-magazine-uk/ to http://www.brandrepublic.com/bulletins/media/article/561728/egmont-unveils-disney-fairies-magazine-uk/
When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.
This message was posted before February 2018. After February 2018, "External links modified" talk page sections are no longer generated or monitored by InternetArchiveBot. No special action is required regarding these talk page notices, other than regular verification using the archive tool instructions below. Editors have permission to delete these "External links modified" talk page sections if they want to de-clutter talk pages, but see the RfC before doing mass systematic removals. This message is updated dynamically through the template {{source check}}
(last update: 5 June 2024).
- If you have discovered URLs which were erroneously considered dead by the bot, you can report them with this tool.
- If you found an error with any archives or the URLs themselves, you can fix them with this tool.
Cheers.—InternetArchiveBot (Report bug) 10:29, 11 September 2017 (UTC)
A lot missing
[edit]characters are missing etc 2A00:23C4:C821:501:1560:842B:211E:4A4C (talk) 07:16, 22 May 2024 (UTC)
- C-Class Disney articles
- Mid-importance Disney articles
- C-Class Disney articles of Mid-importance
- WikiProject Disney articles
- C-Class Animation articles
- Low-importance Animation articles
- C-Class Animation articles of Low-importance
- C-Class American animation articles
- Mid-importance American animation articles
- American animation work group articles
- C-Class Animated films articles
- Mid-importance Animated films articles
- Animated films work group articles
- WikiProject Animation articles
- C-Class film articles
- C-Class American cinema articles
- American cinema task force articles
- WikiProject Film articles
- C-Class television articles
- Mid-importance television articles
- WikiProject Television articles
- C-Class video game articles
- Low-importance video game articles
- WikiProject Video games articles
- C-Class media franchise articles
- Mid-importance media franchise articles
- WikiProject Media franchises articles
- C-Class United States articles
- Mid-importance United States articles
- C-Class United States articles of Mid-importance
- Mid-importance American cinema articles
- WikiProject United States articles