Talk:2021 Hillcrest Primary School accident

	This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
	This article was accepted from this draft on 5 July 2022 by reviewer Timtrent (talk · contribs).

History Low‑importance

	History portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject History, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of the subject of History on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.HistoryWikipedia:WikiProject HistoryTemplate:WikiProject Historyhistory articles
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the project's importance scale.

On 17 November 2022, it was proposed that this article be moved. The result of the discussion was Moved to 2021 Hillcrest Primary School accident.

I am sure there is a better title

I am equally sure that the community can create that title by consensus. 🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦 21:05, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What if we named it "2021 Hillcrest Primary School accident" ? SparklingSnail (talk) 17:04, 21 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Incident would be more appropriate due to the established negligence of Taz-Zorb and the Education Department 2001:8003:1443:F00:B8BE:8F2B:193D:EA8D (talk) 09:04, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Also updates needed with Worksafe charge against Taz-Zorb, and remommended charges against the principle and AST which and department, which the DPP chose to ignore. 2001:8003:1443:F00:B8BE:8F2B:193D:EA8D (talk) 09:06, 12 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Requested move 17 November 2022

The following is a closed discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. Editors desiring to contest the closing decision should consider a move review after discussing it on the closer's talk page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.

The result of the move request was: Moved to 2021 Hillcrest Primary School accident. Consensus within the discussion is to move from the current title. However, there's no consensus within the current discussion on which title to move to. Going by WP:NOTCURRENTTITLE, I took the previous discussion into account as well, and conclude a move to 2021 Hillcrest Primary School accident. (closed by non-admin page mover) – robertsky (talk) 06:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hillcrest Primary School Tragedy (Australia) → ? – Contains an unnecessary disambiguator (no other such tragedy internationally to distinguish from), and non-standard capitalisation (of "tragedy"). People have been asking for an article name change since July but nobody filed until now. However, I can't come up with a better title myself. — Ceso femmuin mbolgaig mbung, mellohi! (投稿) 19:49, 17 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

do a bold move and redirect it Pyraminxsolver (talk) 00:04, 23 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Support something: clearly the current title isn't ideal. I think 2021 Hillcrest Primary School accident, which was suggested above, does a decent job of meeting the WP:NCEVENTS criteria, although I'm open to other ideas. Extraordinary Writ (talk) 01:36, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Maybe move to something along the lines of "Hillcrest jumping castle tragedy"? The jumping castle aspect is highlighted in the titles of about half the sources, and Hillcrest is mentioned in all the rest. Skarmory (talk • contribs) 04:27, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Support removal of disambigator and prefer the alternative Hillcrest jumping castle tragedy that Skarmory suggested. Dicklyon (talk) 04:34, 25 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Move to 2021 Hillcrest Primary School accident per EW. This is the best fit for the standard WP:NCE naming convention, including a year since this is not a well-known and famous accident. I specifically don't like the "tragedy" wording... obviously it is a tragedy, not denying that, but it's not particularly WP:ENCYCLOPEDIC language. — Amakuru (talk) 11:39, 26 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi all, I’m just going to make my contribution as the original author of the article. Thanks for bringing this discussion forward as I’m not particularly familiar with the intricacies of Wikipedia editing. The original event was widely referred to as (the) tragedy in the media, by the vast majority of news outlets. The other word that was commonly used to describe this event was (the/an) incident, which I personally believe may represent the incident better from a local’s perspective, however, whether this falls within Wikipedia guidelines, I’m unsure. Lbrydon02 (talk) 07:22, 1 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.