Jump to content

Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Please add requests for MILHIST participation to Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Military history/Requests for project input. This includes requests for comment, requested moves, articles for deletion, and more.
Main pageDiscussionNews &
open tasks
AcademyAssessmentA-Class
review
ContestAwardsMembers


    Requests for project input

    [edit]

    Help reference military history articles in the WikiProject Unreferenced Articles #NOV24 Backlog Drive

    [edit]

    Hi WikiProject Military history, I’d like to invite anyone interested to join the WikiProject Unreferenced Articles #NOV24 Backlog Drive. There's already been an impressively large reduction in the number of unreferenced military history articles over the last months, but in case you want to apply any more of that energy to the drive, you can quickly access a list of remaining ones here. The drive runs through November, and any help adding reliable sources is welcome. Thanks! Turtlecrown (talk) 13:35, 2 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Inaccurate article section War Reserve Constables

    [edit]

    It's been suggested I draw attention to this Talk:War reserve constable both on here and Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law Enforcement in the hope someone with better skills and ideas than myself can sort out an inaccuate section (they says only 3 WRCs were killed 'in the line of duty' when that's clearly not the case. Many thanks to anyone willing to have a look! Rhillman (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:5.56×45mm NATO#Requested move 29 October 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 01:22, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present)#Requested move 6 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. estar8806 (talk) 01:55, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Good article reassessment for Haile Selassie

    [edit]

    Haile Selassie has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 16:38, 6 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Your input would be welcome at Talk:Eric Braeden#Wilhelm Gustloff. Thanks for participating! Renerpho (talk) 03:39, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    [edit]

    Hi! One of the articles mentioned at Wikipedia:Teahouse#Request for third party feedback may fall under the scope of this WikiProject—not sure about the other; if the articles are within scope, please feel free to respond said articles' talk pages (or the Teahouse) instead of here. Thank you! Rotideypoc41352 (talk · contribs) 00:24, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    An editor has requested that Amache National Historic Site be moved to Granada War Relocation Center, which may be of interest to this WikiProject. You are invited to participate in the move discussion. Spookyaki (talk) 19:00, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Ship Characteristics lacking uniformity

    [edit]

    so I'm just a kid basically and don't know what I'm talking about. However, there are a lot of ships on here that I often find myself at, and it is strange there isn't a formal way to set up the stats of the ships. Some include cost, some don't. some include ship badge, some don't. ship mottos, classification numbers, consistent displacement(some include full load and regular, others don't specify). I feel like it would make sense if not to standardize it at least advise for certain info to be included Mlayap (talk) 00:28, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Mini-drive on Category:Military history articles needing attention only to structure

    [edit]

    I recently asked for help here on assessing articles in Category:Military history articles needing attention only to supporting materials. Contributions by Chipmunkdavis, Hawkeye7, Matarisvan, Pickersgill-Cunliffe, Zawed, Hog Farm and Sturmvogel 66 brought down that category's backlog by 50 or so and helped make progress towards our B-class target (we nudged up 0.1% on the target over the period, but not all of this will be down to the new articles generated from the drive).

    I thought I would try to replicate this success in another area. These articles in theory need only attention to structure ie. section headers and lead paragraph. Same procedure as before:

    Look at one of the articles below and either:

    • If you think it passes all of the B-class criteria and you haven't been involved in writing the article, assess it as B-class on the talk banner template
    • If you think the article requires improvement against another of the B-class criteria, assess it as so on the talk banner template
    • If you can improve the article to meet all of the B-class criteria, do so and then list it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Military history/Assessment/Requests for formal assessment

    When you have done one of these actions strike through the article name and sign against it on the list below

    Thanks in advance everybody - Dumelow (talk) 15:32, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Classical
    Medieval
    Early Muslim
    Early Modern
    American Revolutionary War
    Napoleonic
    American Civil War
    World War I
    World War II
    Cold War
    Post-Cold War

    Requested Page: CARDOM-T

    [edit]

    There is already a page on the standard CARDOM. Is the upgraded T-variant different enough to create a new article for it, or could it become a sub-section of the existing page? Tylermack999 (talk) 14:47, 14 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    It's a variant, so it should probably be added as a subsection to the existing page. - The Bushranger One ping only 07:38, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Understood, I can start that subsection on the Cardom page. Should I remove it from the requested articles or leave it there? Tylermack999 (talk) 14:18, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Burn notice (document)#Requested move 8 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 16:23, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    I need help here.. so The current Israel-Hamas war has spillovers is many countries in the region obviously. In Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present), every theatre is Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present)#Events by country has a main, more in-depth article except Middle Eastern crisis (2023–present)#Syria. I wanted to create an article detailing the spillover from strikes, statements, and especially the Recent ground operations, Israeli military constructions within Syrian territory (whcih also included resulted in some notable news). at the same time, I want it to be coordinated, and sure to be justified and in-form of the general Wikipedia mode of publication/operation. I created it as a draft and I was directed here by the Wikipedia Help Desk to seek help. I'm sure my draft is not the best it can be yet. Can people interested in the matter help? RamiPat (talk) 20:20, 15 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Nominations for military historian of the year for 2024 are open!

    [edit]
    Military historian of the year 2024

    As we approach the end of the year, it is time for us to nominate the editors we believe have made a real difference to the project. As part of the first step to determining this year's "Military Historian of the Year" award, all Milhist editors are invited to nominate those that they feel deserve a nod of appreciation for their hard work over the past 12 months.

    The nomination process will commence on 00:01 (UTC) on 16 November and last until 23:59 (UTC) on 30 November. As the awards process is one of simple approval, opposes are deprecated. After that a new thread will be created and a voting period of will commence on 00:01 (UTC) on 1 December during which editors will be able to cast their approval vote for up to three of the nominees. At the end of this period on 23:59 on 30 December, the top three editors will be awarded the Gold, Silver and Bronze Wiki respectively; all other nominees will receive the WikiProject Barnstar.

    Please nominate editors below this line, including links in the nomination statement to the most significant articles/lists/images editors have worked on since 1 January 2024. Please keep nomination statements concise; excluding links to the articles/list/images in question, the ideal nomination statement should be about 20 words. Self nominations are frowned upon. Please do not vote until the nominations have been finalized. Thanks, and good luck! For all the coordinators, Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    1. noclador (talk · contribs): Since 2005 has been working mainly on articles about the Italian Army. In 2023 started a project to write articles for all the Italian Army units active after WWII. Since August 2023 noclador has brought to B-class 298 articles about units of the Italian Army, of which 289 were created from scratch. Created 145 articles in 2023 and 2024. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 18:58, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    2. MSGJ (talk · contribs): Has worked on our Template:WikiProject Military history and the Lua Module:Banner shell and Module:WikiProject banner to implement changes required for our A-class reviews. Hawkeye7 (discuss) 19:10, 17 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
      Thanks. A barn star would be appreciated but this nomination ... seems excessive — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 13:05, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Zawed (talk · contribs): Another year, another seemingly endless quantity of New Zealand-related articles. From the Second World War and articles such as Mick Ensor, to the 1869 Battle of Te Pōrere, Zawed consistently produces a variety of high quality content. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:18, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    4. Donner60 (talk · contribs) - for extensive behind-the-scenes work as a coordinator, especially their tireless work with the assessment process. Hog Farm Talk 15:01, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Nominations for military history newcomer of the year for 2024 are open!

    [edit]
    Military history newcomer of the year 2024

    As we approach the end of the year, it is time for us to nominate the editors we believe have made a real difference to the project. In addition to the Military historian of the year, all Milhist editors are invited to nominate a promising newcomer that they feel deserves a nod of appreciation for their hard work over the past 12 months for the Military history newcomer of the year award. The award is open to any editor who has become active in military history articles in the last 12 months.

    Like the Military Historian of the Year, the nomination process will begin at 00:01 (UTC) on 16 November and last until 23:59 (UTC) on 30 November 2024. As the awards process is one of simple approval, opposes are deprecated. After that a new thread will be created and a voting period will commence on 00:01 1 December 2024 during which editors will be able to cast their approval vote for up to three of the nominees. At the end of this period on 23:59 30 December 2024, the top editor will be awarded the Gold Wiki; all other nominees will receive the WikiProject Barnstar.

    Please nominate editors below this line, including links in the nomination statement to the most significant articles/lists/images editors have worked on since 1 January 2024. Please keep nomination statements concise; excluding links to the articles/list/images in question, the ideal nomination statement should be about 20 words. Self-nominations are frowned upon. Please do not vote until the nominations have been finalized. Thanks, and good luck! On behalf of all the coordinators, Hawkeye7 (discuss) 04:13, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    1. CommissarDoggo (talk · contribs): A new joiner to the project this year, their work includes bringing the American VC winner William Henry Harrison Seeley to GA and expanding Michael Wettlaufer from stub to B class. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    2. Matarisvan (talk · contribs): Significant additions to Indian military history, a notoriously difficult topic on Wikipedia - they have also since been voted a coordinator of the WikiProject. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:10, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    3. Klutserke (talk · contribs): Second World War naval history, including the significant expansion and re-writing of HMS Sheffield (C24) and the creation of articles including 8.8 cm SK C/25 naval gun. Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 21:22, 18 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Does anyone have sources for the FAA squadrons embarked on Ark Royal? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 19:20, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    @Keith-264
    800 (Skua), 810 (Swordfish) and 818 (Swordfish) squadrons. Source: Sturtivant, Ray (1984). The Squadrons of the Fleet Air Arm. Air-Britain. ISBN 0 85130 120 7. pages 155, 198 and 237 respectively. Nthep (talk) 19:43, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
    Thanks very much. Keith-264 (talk) 19:45, 16 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    More eyes needed on Phoenix Program please

    [edit]

    More eyes needed on Phoenix Program please. Mztourist (talk) 05:53, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Operation FB question

    [edit]

    I have done another table under Other independent Soviet sailings (blanked for the moment) but the scholarly apparatus has appeared to its right. I though that putting {{clear}} under it would help but alas not. How do I do the table longways instead? Thanks Keith-264 (talk) 21:14, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sorted it out, I'd left the colwidth in from when it was a list. Keith-264 (talk) 08:46, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Muhammad Zia-ul-Haq#Requested move 8 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. 𝚈𝚘𝚟𝚝 (𝚝𝚊𝚕𝚔𝚟𝚝) 22:07, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Widespread fictitious reference problem

    [edit]

    I've reported it as an incident on the admin noticeboard but people here probably need to be aware since the articles (I've spotted) that are affected tend to relate to military history. Maybe someone can help look for and fix this stuff? https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Fictitious_references_introduced_by_User:XXzoonamiXX_around_2014 Fangz (talk) 21:44, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    There is a requested move discussion at Talk:Scolding Letters#Requested move 13 November 2024 that may be of interest to members of this WikiProject. Raladic (talk) 23:16, 20 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Austrian WW2 helicopters

    [edit]

    Reposted from WT:AIR where it drew no response: So while getting back into things checking various categories and such, I came across the Nagler-Rolz NR 54, a truly bizzare early helicopter. What caught my eye, though, was the fact the aircraft is universally described as "Austrian", categorised as a "1940s Austrian helicopter", and so on. The thing is...well, at the time it was built and flown, there was no Austria, as it was after the Anschluss and before the end of WW2, or even the Moscow Declarations. So I'm wondering if this should be left as "Austrian", or changed to "German" to reflect the geopolitical reality of the time it was manufactured and flown? - The Bushranger One ping only 03:03, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Sources seem to agree that while the designers of the NR 54 were Austrian, the craft itself was German and is so listed by history. Indeed, the extant Smithsonian source notes "Country of Origin: Germany". Some other works from Internet Archive:
    Heinz Nowarra, Die Deutsche Luftrüstung 1933 1945 [1]
    Smithsonian, The Smithsonian National Air and Space Museum directory of airplanes [2]
    Eiichiro Sekigawa, German Military Aircraft in the Second World War [3]
    Pickersgill-Cunliffe (talk) 10:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    RFC on Russian invasion of Ukraine

    [edit]

    THere's currently a discussion about whether or not to include North Korea as a co-belligerent. Please feel free to comment. Thanks! Nemov (talk) 13:56, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

    Discussion on the renaming of the article Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge

    [edit]

    Please see here for a discussion about renaming Allegations of United States support for the Khmer Rouge to United States support for the Khmer Rouge. FOARP (talk) 17:15, 21 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]