User talk:Nemov
Your GA nomination of Atlanta Braves
[edit]The article Atlanta Braves you nominated as a good article has passed 
; see Talk:Atlanta Braves for comments about the article, and Talk:Atlanta Braves/GA2 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of SSSB -- SSSB (talk) 18:06, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
- Thanks so much for your help with this nomination. It's a long article. Maybe I'll pick something a little smaller next time! Nemov (talk) 18:13, 11 January 2025 (UTC)
 | |
| story · music · places |
|---|
- Congratulations, and happy new year 2025! Today, pictured on the Main page, Tosca, in memory of her first appearance on stage OTD in 1900, and of principal author Brian Boulton. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 20:40, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
- Today I had a composer (trumpeter, conductor) on the main page who worked closely with another who just became GA, - small world! To celebrate: mostly flowers pics from vacation ;) --Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:54, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- Today is Schubert's birthday. I added a pic to his article (and my story) and raised a question on the talk, regarding the lead image. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 22:30, 31 January 2025 (UTC)
Please don't refactor my comments
[edit]OK I'm trying to assume good faith here but first you delete my annotated bibliography and then you say you're going to hat it and it just seems like you want to bury the several hours of work I put into trying to satisfy the frankly absurd standard being demanded for sourcing of this long past-due WP:SKYBLUE change. Please just leave my comments at article talk alone. If you do that I will be happy to treat the deletion of my comments earlier as an honest mistake. Simonm223 (talk) 19:30, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- You're not assuming good faith by leaving me this message. Your comment was restored before you came here to leave this note. You're bludgeoning the discussion and that will discourage others from commenting. I accidently deleted it after attempting to post my survey twice because you keep making changes. I'd recommend a better use of your time. Nemov (talk) 19:34, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- The only reason for the deluge of reliable sources is because Springee and Toa Nidhiki05 demanded them as evidence. In past interactions with Springee where I've provided citations they've complained about a lack of quotes so I am providing those up front. As those quotes are from academic work some of those quotes are lengthy. I'd be happy to stop if those people insisting that the onus is on those people who feel the article is non-neutral will concede that sufficient reliable sources have been provided. Frankly I'm pretty tired of reading about the Republican party. Simonm223 (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- I'm asking for you to create a discussion section or collapse the wall of text. If you're gonna ignore my advice and assume bad faith please leave me TALK. I asked nicely and you refused. I'm not interested in continuing this back and forth. Nemov (talk) 19:41, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
- The only reason for the deluge of reliable sources is because Springee and Toa Nidhiki05 demanded them as evidence. In past interactions with Springee where I've provided citations they've complained about a lack of quotes so I am providing those up front. As those quotes are from academic work some of those quotes are lengthy. I'd be happy to stop if those people insisting that the onus is on those people who feel the article is non-neutral will concede that sufficient reliable sources have been provided. Frankly I'm pretty tired of reading about the Republican party. Simonm223 (talk) 19:37, 21 January 2025 (UTC)