Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 September 7

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 6 << Aug | September | Oct >> September 8 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 7

[edit]

00:25, 7 September 2024 review of submission by 2603:7000:C800:354F:C595:CED2:6C7:698D

[edit]
2603:7000:C800:354F:C595:CED2:6C7:698D (talk) 00:25, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

01:15, 7 September 2024 review of submission by Jaytirth joshi

[edit]

Finding References and Help as this is a COI Jaytirth joshi (talk) 01:15, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

☒N Deleted I suggest you do not attempt to use Wikipedia to advertise yourself, Jaytirth joshi. It is always doomed to failure. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 21:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04:48, 7 September 2024 review of submission by Mrsrusso35

[edit]

because my article not good Mrsrusso35 (talk) 04:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Is there a question? The article is not written like an encyclopedia entry, has no sources, and makes no real claim to notability. The reviewer was kind to not simply reject the draft outright. Given the name you're using on Wikipedia, it also appears there's a high probability that this is an autobiography or an article about someone you're closely connected to. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 05:02, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

06:27, 7 September 2024 review of submission by Davideeajeanseb

[edit]

I don't understand why you do not find the verification of Jean-Sèbastien Colau, as He is the Ballet Director of the National Fondation of Teatro Massimo Palermo, as we can verify everything easily on the website of this National Theatre www.teatromassimo.it Davideeajeanseb (talk) 06:27, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Davideeajeanseb: this draft is completely unreferenced, which is totally unacceptable especially where the subject is a living person (see WP:BLP). For the same reason, there is also no evidence of notability, which is a core requirement for inclusion in the encyclopaedia. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:32, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
PS: What is your relationship with the subject? Your user name suggests a connection, and you've uploaded a photo of him which you say you've taken. I've posted a message on your talk page regarding conflicts of interest, please read and respond to it. Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:34, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

10:22, 7 September 2024 review of submission by A37393

[edit]

What needs to be improved? A37393 (talk) 10:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@A37393: We can't cite the Global Times (no editorial oversight). The Paralympics website is useless for notability (too sparse). The People's Daily source is credited to Xinhua, which is a dodgy source for any matter where the CCP has an interest in spinning it but I'm willing to give it the benefit of the doubt. Even so, one source by itself cannot support any article on Wikipedia, let alone one where strict sourcing requirements apply. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 15:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

12:48, 7 September 2024 review of submission by Slgrandson

[edit]

Turned down several hours ago over reliable-source concerns--although the links from Newspapers.com and Allmusic clearly suggest otherwise. Filing this appeal to see if I'm missing one more ingredient per WP:NALBUM/WP:SIGCOV, or if the decline was a mistake; on behalf of page creator Piperium (talk · contribs). Slgrandson (How's my egg-throwing coleslaw?) 12:48, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

14:44, 7 September 2024 review of submission by MartaTari

[edit]

Can you tell me for which informations reliable sources are needed. If you can specify me this then I can rewrite the article in a better way without (I hope) making errors like this.

Thanks MartaTari (talk) 14:44, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@MartaTari: pretty much everything needs to be supported by reliable sources. Which source gives this person's date of birth? Which one says that "He is renowned for his contributions to research on vortex reconnection, turbulence, and boundary layer stability"? Where does his educational history come from? Etc. etc. You should only be summarising what reliable sources say, and then you must cite those sources so that the information can be verified. This is a core principle of Wikipedia in any article, but especially important in articles on living people (see WP:BLP). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:51, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the reply. Now I will correct what you made me note.
thank you MartaTari (talk) 14:55, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

17:36, 7 September 2024 review of submission by CATLORD1944

[edit]

should I add it to a page about cookies CATLORD1944 (talk) 17:36, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@CATLORD1944: This draft has been rejected and will not be considered further. We do not accept random things and concepts that are novel; sources are hard-required to demonstrate that the term/concept is in relatively widespread use. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:22, 7 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]