Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2024 September 13

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< September 12 << Aug | September | Oct >> Current help desk >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


September 13

[edit]

02:26, 13 September 2024 review of submission by Georgiarosecooke

[edit]

Hello,

I am wondering why the Biography got rejected from submission? What could I change? What should I put in a Biography on Wikipedia? What shouldn't I put in a Biography on Wikipedia?

Thankyou.

Sincerely, Georgia Rose Cooke Georgiarosecooke (talk) 02:26, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The entirety of this article is simply (presumably) your name and a bunch of SEO words. It's not written in an encyclopedic fashion and is completely unsourced. And realistically, there's no content to source since it's just a list of buzzwords. CoffeeCrumbs (talk) 05:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
It's worth noting attempting search engine optimisation on Wikipedia is a waste of time. All Wikipedia pages (not just articles) use nofollow, which means that every search engine that complies with robots.txt will ignore outgoing links from it. And a large chunk of Wikipedia pages are noindexed, preventing them from showing up on search engines full stop. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 07:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
A Wikipedia article about you should consist of a summary of what people wholly unconnected with you have chosen to write about you, and publish in reliable places: that is (almost) all. Furthermore, it is not in any way for your benefit (except incidentally). What you want to tell the world about yourself is utterly irrelevant to Wikipedia. Please read an article about yourself isn't necessarily a good thing. ColinFine (talk) 17:32, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

04:34, 13 September 2024 review of submission by Tizzythewhale

[edit]

please review this article, i have added citations... Tizzythewhale (talk) 04:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

@Tizzythewhale: the draft has been resubmitted and will be reviewed in due course. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:45, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

09:53, 13 September 2024 review of submission by Tayyab121

[edit]

Could someone please review the article and let me know if it meets the criteria for inclusion in a Wikipedia namespace? 

Tayyab121 (talk) 09:53, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@Tayyab121: this draft has been rejected already, and will therefore not be considered further. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:55, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
i have removed the promotional content and now its ready for review you can now review it Tayyab121 (talk) 09:57, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
This was not rejected for being promotional, but for lacking evidence of notability. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:07, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tayyab121 You say you are a professional content editor, but that you aren't paid for your contributions. Both of these things cannot be true at the same time.
Also, you claim to have personally created the logo of the company. 331dot (talk) 10:12, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot
I have listed myself as a Content Editor on my user page. I want to clarify that I have no personal or professional relationship with the company Mushq. My involvement with the article is independent and unpaid.
I noticed that the name "Mushq" was previously redirected to the Wikipedia page for Mushk, a Pakistani drama serial. This redirection was not relevant, as "Mushq" and Mushk are completely separate entities. The content I have published provides more accurate and detailed information about the fashion brand Mushq, which is distinct from the drama serial.
Please review your decision of rejection after revision of Mushq article.
Thanks Tayyab121 (talk) 10:34, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Tayyab121 If you have no relationship with the company, why do you claim to have personally created and personally own the copyright to the logo of the company? So you're not a "professional content editor"?
How did you come to edit about this company? (which, after making a few practice edits, you started editing about) You also claim to have taken an image of their store in Lahore. 331dot (talk) 10:39, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I understand that I mistakenly mentioned the content as my work. I will correct this, as the information was sourced directly from the company's website. I apologize for any confusion this may have caused. Tayyab121 (talk) 10:44, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
You have infringed on the company's copyright and must immediately go to Commons and request deletion of the logo. Images are not relevant to the draft process, so you don't need to worry about adding a logo yet. Logos are typically uploaded to this Wikipedia directly under "fair use" rules, which does carry some restrictions but allows for limited use in articles(not drafts).
Is the image of their store from the company website too? 331dot (talk) 10:59, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@DoubleGrazing As mentioned in the initial feedback, I have revised the article to remove promotional content and added reliable sources for references. I would appreciate your review of these changes to ensure that all issues have been addressed.
Additionally, please note that Mushq, the fashion brand, was launched in 2018, which is before the Pakistani drama serial Mushk aired in 2020. This distinction is important for clarity and context in the article.
Thank you Tayyab121 (talk) 10:15, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The need to differentiate the store from the TV show is not grounds to create an article. 331dot (talk) 10:42, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@331dot
From my perspective, if a subject exists and is notable, it should not be redirected to an unrelated article. Instead, accurate and detailed information about the actual entity should be provided. This approach enhances the value and reliability of the platform.
This is one of sources that i have used for information.
https://tracxn.com/d/companies/mushq/__E5tmSq7CQJWxIJZgLPYxvEg-3psqhwHrD3SLudnMi3s
Tayyab121 (talk) 10:51, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
The only issue is if the topic is notable- not to provide differentiation amongst other topics. In any event, this discussion is academic, as the draft was rejected and will not be considered further, as the company does not meet the definition of a notable company. 331dot (talk) 11:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

13:48, 13 September 2024 review of submission by SKumar58

[edit]

help me out, unable to summit the articles SKumar58 (talk) 13:48, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered any more. You have not demonstrated that the company meets the definition of a notable company.
Furthermore, you have not disclosed your relationship with the company, per WP:COI and WP:PAID. You claim that you personally created and personally own the copyright to the company logo. Your username also matches that of the person you say is the CEO of the company, that makes you a paid editor and the Terms of Use require you to make the paid editing disclosure. 331dot (talk) 13:52, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I am not related to this company, or the person related in this article; my name is SethupathiKumar as Skumar58, I just created this account Wikipedia. interest in contributing information, this company name is related to Bigil Movies Name, I research on online then I create on the artical SKumar58 (talk) 07:18, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SKumar58: did you by any chance previously edit under the Vr26studios account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:56, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Yes, because I am online editor, Vr26studios is my hidden stage name on content creation, then I change name SethupathiKumar to SKumar58 SKumar58 (talk) 07:22, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@SKumar58: given that your original (or at least earlier) account was blocked, you are not allowed to edit from any account or IP address. The block applies to you as an individual, not just to the blocked account. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:42, 15 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:31, 13 September 2024 review of submission by 198.52.165.99

[edit]

Hello,

I was declined for my first submission of "Infinite Universe Theory" which I then resubmitted which then took me to a page that said it was declined. Is there a way to find out if my resubmission (2nd attempt) was accepted or if the second attempt was also declined and if I could get some help to edit this article for the standards that Wikipedia requires?

Thank you

Viromi 198.52.165.99 (talk) 18:31, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This appears to be a research essay rather than an encyclopaedia article. I would also see Help:Referencing for beginners; we aren't fans of just slapping references on the end and prefer them to be in-line. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v threads critiques 18:33, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

18:37, 13 September 2024 review of submission by EZ BC

[edit]

It was rejecetd for unrelaible sources. I've learned that local news outlets are not deemed reliable. I've added more citations from national news sources and government sites, but is it okay to still include some local news citations for some details? EZ BC (talk) 18:37, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

It's not accurate as a blanket statement to say that local sources are inherently unreliable, but local sources don't usually have the reach to establish notability of a topic. The main issue is that you have merely summarized this person's activities, you have not summarized significant coverage of this person that shows they are a notable person. What is the influence of their advocacy as sources see it? 331dot (talk) 19:21, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:00, 13 September 2024 review of submission by 198.52.165.99

[edit]

I resubmitted an article with the changes requested and was rejected again. Would you please tell me if I could speak with the editor(McMatter Talk) regarding the specific changes they require?

Thank you

Viromi 198.52.165.99 (talk) 19:00, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You put the words "article declined" where the name of your draft is intended to go. Which draft is it? You can communicate with that reviewer by going to their user talk page, you can click the word "talk" next to their name in the decline message on the draft. 331dot (talk) 19:18, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

19:13, 13 September 2024 review of submission by Qmwne235

[edit]

Since the notice that this draft was declined was accompanied only by a standard template, I was wondering if I could have a more detailed review of the sources. On which of the criteria for notability is the article currently falling short? I'd appreciate any advice! Qmwne235 19:13, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You can ask the reviewer who declined it to explain, on their talk page. ColinFine (talk) 20:35, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They would need to pass the criteria at WP:NBAND to be accepted. Theroadislong (talk) 20:38, 13 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
They have been credited as one of the most influential bands in Canada's screamo scene is an exceedingly thin and unpersuasive claim of notability. When musical genres are sliced and diced into ever thinner and more obscure sub-sub-sub genres, notability becomes very difficult to establish. Did they have any hit records? Cullen328 (talk) 07:22, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Qmwne235, your assertion gained acclaimed (sic) as an important hardcore release is cited to an article that discusses dozens of bands and devotes just two sentences to this band, namely Edmonton’s I Hate Sex called it quits this summer but left a mark on the Canadian scene. They went through a number of lineup changes but always featured vocalist Nicole Boychuk, whose impassioned, at times desperate sounding, delivery anchored their sound. If you think these two sentences amount to "gained acclaim", then maybe encyclopedia writing is not for you, because hyperbole is not permitted on Wikipedia. Cullen328 (talk) 07:39, 14 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/Archives/2024_September_13&oldid=1246446166"