Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2022 November 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< November 4 << Oct | November | Dec >> November 6 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


November 5

[edit]

08:42:55, 5 November 2022 review of submission by Softzpk92

[edit]


Most of the same niche companies has page within Wikipedia, I am not here to post article as for advertisement purpose.

Softzpk92 (talk) 08:42, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

@Softzpk92: this draft is pure promotion, with no evidence of notability; in any case, it has been rejected now. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

14:43:19, 5 November 2022 review of submission by MK Jugantar

[edit]


MK Jugantar (talk) 14:43, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

What is your question @MK Jugantar? Please don't just post blank sections, you need to ask an actual question.
Anyway, as already explained yesterday by 331dot, the draft was rejected as it is unsuitable as an article. It appears to be a copy of your userpage, and therefore should not be submitted for pre-publication review at AfC. You can just edit your userpage as you wish (within policy, obviously; see WP:UP). -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 14:47, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

22:59:54, 5 November 2022 review of draft by 174.24.76.113

[edit]


174.24.76.113 (talk) 22:59, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

I can not understand why 18 year old editors are telling me there are not reliable sources when I am using two books, with Amazon listings, and website. Arthur Roy Mitchell is an artist being recognized in media publications like Cowboy and Indians and True West.

Please see Referencing for beginners; referencing must be in-line with the text the references support. There are also some opinion/conclusions that should be removed or, if found in a source, cited to whomever made the claim(i.e. "has touched many lives"). 331dot (talk) 23:39, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
And please don't judge or make assumptions about other editors. Editors are of all ages, races, religion, gender, etc. 331dot (talk) 23:41, 5 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am in my late sixties and have edited here for 16 years and agree with the other reviewers (whatever their ages) The tone of your draft is totally inappropriate and sourcing is woefully inadequate. Theroadislong (talk) 20:25, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
IP editor, how do you know the ages of the reviewers? David10244 (talk) 04:27, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Theroadislong|331dot: This subject is probably worth an article if rewritten in encyclopaedic manner quoting reliable sources. The whole article is a straight word-for-word copy/paste of this website page with no evidence of permission to use the prose. Most likely a copyright violation too unless the editor is the author of that website. BTW, one of the reviewers shows his age and birth date on his user page. ww2censor (talk) 10:48, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

23:56:56, 5 November 2022 review of submission by Dr. Kanyabigega

[edit]


Dr. Kanyabigega (talk) 23:56, 5 November 2022 (UTC) Hi I don't understand why you deleted my article Silas[reply]

@Dr. Kanyabigega: your draft was deleted because it was deemed purely promotional, per G11. Please note also that writing about yourself, which is what I presume this was, is very strongly discouraged; see AUTOBIO. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:18, 6 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]