Jump to content

Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation/Help desk/Archives/2021 April 29

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Help desk
< April 28 << Mar | April | May >> April 30 >
Welcome to the WikiProject Articles for creation Help Desk Archives
The page you are currently viewing is a transcluded archive page. While you can leave answers for any questions shown below, please ask new questions on one of the current Help Desk pages.


April 29

[edit]

Request on 04:40:29, 29 April 2021 for assistance on AfC submission by Manishthapa1981

[edit]


I have tried my best to furnish all the details of the subject I am contributing but still it is rejected on the ground of "Reliable Sources". What are the parameters to judge your source to be "reliable" or "unreliable" especially in a country when English is not the first language and there are 80 different languages are spoken and written? Thus we will get very few sources written in English. So it is unfair in this context to label credible sources as unreliable sources" when they are the only available news sources in the country.


Manishthapa1981 (talk) 04:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

We don't care if sources are in English or not, nor if they are online. We only care that they discuss the subject at length, have professional editorial oversight responsible for fact-checking and retractions, and have no direct connexion to the subject or their surrogates. Most of your sources fail one of those three criteria just from skimming the references list. —A little blue Bori v^_^v Jéské Couriano 04:44, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

08:58:20, 29 April 2021 review of submission by Abdulla2021

[edit]

Dear Wikipedians,' im trying to create an article about my village, As the part of Community outreach programme for increasing the information of Sudan in Wikipedia, please here is the draft, please I need your comments on the writing style to avoid any mistakes, so I will forward and add the references:

Al Tekyna A village

Location:

Al Tekyna village is located on the Blue Nile, where the Nile borders on the southern and western side of the forest, in the north the village bordered by big agricultural land, this land honored by the people in the village the lands are cultivated in the autumn season, and most of the villagers depend in their food on the corn and millet produces by this land, which have now been turned into farms and are within the villages of Local and Wa Al Abbas east of Sennar, Al-Tekina village is characterized by its strategic location and is the first village after the bridge connecting Sennar city, followed by the Banat village, Abogaili then Al-Arkikiin village.

Population: the population of Al-Tekina village proximity is about 500, their people work in agriculture and trade and some of them work in the field of education, where the village includes the largest number of teachers in the locality of Wad Al Abbas.

History: Al-Tekina village was founded in 1903 by three families who came from western Sudan to the Blue Nile region, where these families captured the area and worked in the field of agriculture and grazing, where they owned a large animal wealth that was used for their living. Reference:

Abdulla (talk) 08:58, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]


10:00:36, 29 April 2021 review of submission by AppuSunkad

[edit]


AppuSunkad (talk) 10:00, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AppuSunkad You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further. 331dot (talk) 10:01, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

11:25:16, 29 April 2021 review of draft by Yourepartofit

[edit]


Hi, I've been working on compiling a list of New Jersey Record Labels and I'm having trouble understanding why this article keeps getting rejected? I thought this page does not require a rating on the project's quality scale because it falls under the scope of record labels which often times are not mentioned in articles that directly relate to them. If anyone could shed light on what Draft:Mint_400_Records is missing it would be appreciated.

Yourepartofit (talk) 11:25, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yourepartofit The reason for the rejection was given by the reviewers- that you have not provided independent reliable sources with significant coverage of the label, showing how it meets the special Wikipedia definition of a notable organization. The quality scale is not relevant to that- a low quality article may be accepted as long as the sources are adequate. 331dot (talk) 15:07, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

13:45:14, 29 April 2021 review of submission by MBZAM

[edit]


MBZAM (talk) 13:45, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

MBZAM You don't ask a question, but your draft was rejected, meaning that it will not be considered further, as it has almost no content. 331dot (talk) 15:05, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

17:40:40, 29 April 2021 review of submission by কাপ্তান

[edit]


I like to improving the article name " Major Abdul Waheed Choudhury " https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Major_Abdul_Waheed_Chowdhury but it keep being rejected for insufficient resources and my account block and for other issues like SPI Shokpuppet Suspwct . Pleas help me publish a draft name " Major Abdul Waheed Choudhury "to improve that article further.--কাপ্তান (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Since your account is globally blocked this account will also be blocked. Blaze The Wolf | Proud Furry and Wikipedia Editor (talk) 19:12, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

কাপ্তান (talk) 17:40, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:13:01, 29 April 2021 review of submission by কাপ্তান

[edit]

I like to improving the article name " Major Abdul Waheed Choudhury " https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Draft:Major_Abdul_Waheed_Chowdhury but it keep being rejected for insufficient resources and my account block and for other issues like SPI Shokpuppet Suspwct . Pleas help me publish a draft name " Major Abdul Waheed Choudhury "to improve that article further.

কাপ্তান (talk) 19:13, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@কাপ্তান: For almost two years now you have been told that this subject does not merit an article because Abdul Waheed Choudhur falls well short of Wikipedia's notability standards. GPL93 (talk) 19:22, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

19:33:53, 29 April 2021 review of draft by 92.237.102.75

[edit]


I need help improving a draft article at Draft:Tucker Budzyn, and I have a WP:COI so I may struggle, therefore I need assistance with it. Thank you. I have found some sources here but im not sure if they are reliable or not: https://www.hitc.com/en-gb/2020/06/12/what-happened-to-tucker-budzyn/ https://www.news18.com/news/buzz/insta-celeb-dog-tucker-poses-with-brother-in-black-tie-photoshoot-fans-are-calling-it-men-in-bork-3100523.html https://www.distractify.com/p/what-happened-to-tucker-budzyn https://www.indiatoday.in/trending-news/story/video-of-dog-making-hilarious-expressions-goes-viral-you-will-love-it-1721571-2020-09-14 https://edtimes.in/have-we-finally-decoded-dogs-language/ https://scroll.in/video/933434/watch-golden-retriever-meets-hair-clip-gets-perplexed-generates-joy-and-love-on-social-media https://www.hellomagazine.com/homes/20210419111351/most-popular-dogs-on-tiktok/ https://www.hindustantimes.com/trending/-am-here-linda-tucker-the-doggo-s-adorable-reaction-to-call-your-dog-s-name-challenge-may-make-you-say-aww-101611481911308.html https://www.dailydot.com/unclick/invisible-challenge-dog-meme/ https://www.tag24.de/unterhaltung/zuckersuess-hund-scheitert-bei-witzigem-ueberraschungs-angriff-1638901 92.237.102.75 (talk) 19:33, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I suggest that you take one of two approaches:
  1. Don't write it at all. I see it is empty now, Abandon it and request that the article be created at Wikipedia:Requested articles
  2. Write the best draft you are able
This is not the place to request that someone writes a draft for you FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 09:53, 30 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

23:02:02, 29 April 2021 review of submission by Delbarital

[edit]


Delbarital (talk) 23:02, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I'm working on an article for Next Insurance. Last time, when the article was submitted for review it was rejected for notability. Since then I added many more references, yet I'm afraid it will be rejected again for the same reason. I wonder whether it makes sense to submit the article as a short stub for now instead of a full article. Thanks.

Delbarital, the sourcing is improving, and the article seems decently notable, so it doesn’t make sense to make it a short stub (that would recreate the original problem). Eternal Shadow Talk 23:55, 29 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]