Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2024 December 20
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 103 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 163 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 199 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 201 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 203 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 263 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 330 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route 471 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route CAT5 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route X50 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
- Template:Greater Manchester bus route X22 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
All these route templates have not been used since October due to this Afd. If the creator wants to keep them as they work on creating the respective articles for these to be used to meet notability standards, then it can be userfied until ready for mainspace use. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:57, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Unused and graphs have not displayed for a while. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:44, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Template:KirstenboschMap (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused map. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:41, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
No longer used and graphs are not displayed for almost a year if I'm not mistaken. If wanted to be kept, can be userfied or a subpage of some kind. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:40, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Only two links. Not needed as both links can be found from one another's article. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 01:38, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Template:Influencers (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Scope is far too broad and ill-defined for a navbox (per WP:NAVBOX: small, well-defined group of articles; The articles should refer to each other, to a reasonable extent). This could easily grow to encompass anyone famous on social media (thousands of people?) and I foresee a lot of arguments about inclusion. — The Earwig (talk) 00:02, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete: I was literally writing up a nomination and refreshed the template and saw this. I'd argue it's not a helpful or useful template and, if you look at Category:Social media influencers, it's very unclear what should and shouldn't be included. If we included everyone for which that term is applicable to it would be far beyond the size of anything that would be reasonable. There's thousands of people who refer to themselves as such and the selected entries don't seem to follow any particular logic except possibly WP:ILIKEIT. Hey man im josh (talk) 00:03, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator & josh - influencer, the title link, actually defines the term as someone "who is considered influential"; in theory, that definition could refer to literally anyone. The template would be too large and lose its present usefulness, if any. Staraction (talk | contribs) 00:09, 20 December 2024 (UTC)