Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2022 April 28

Add links
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
< April 27 April 29 >

April 28

[edit]

Beyoncé track list templates

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 08:43, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The use of track listing templates in infoboxes has been depreciated a long time ago. The default collapse of information is discouraged per MOS:COLLAPSE ≫ Lil-Unique1 -{ Talk }- 21:19, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

  • Note: The above templates were previously nominated for deletion at this TfD in March 2019, but delete per the existence of {{Beyoncé songs}} navbox. StarcheerspeaksnewslostwarsTalk to me 15:06, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete all: all of these songs are already included in the navbox {{Beyoncé songs}}, and {{Extra track listing}} states "Track listings should not be added to infoboxes if there is a navigation template or navbox at the bottom of the article which already lists the songs". These track listings are redundant. Richard3120 (talk) 19:15, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 23:31, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Simon J. Smith

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Galobtter (pingó mió) 00:56, 6 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

With one redirected and one up for deletion, this template now navigates only three films. Even if that weren't the case, they are all DreamWorks Animation properties, so this template is entirely redundant to {{DreamWorks Animation}}. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 19:51, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Megamind

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was no consensus. Primefac (talk) 08:52, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Only three articles, plus the primary so fails WP:NENAN suggestion of five plus the primary. Also has redirects to the primary page. Unnecessary when so few articles. Indagate (talk) 19:36, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Per nom - a game article of Mega Team Unite is in the works. It will be hard to find any sources for the game but we need to keep it just for the Franchise page. BMA-Nation2020 (talk) 18:49, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Mega Team Unite does not seem notable so shouldn't have its own article, I couldn't see enough sources. Franchise page is currently at AfD but why is this template needed for it? Surely everything will be linked there also. Indagate (talk) 18:53, 29 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Inccat

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 23:50, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Unused template that is not substituted when used on category spaces. Template:Companies established in the year is better used alternative. WikiCleanerMan (talk) 18:13, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KTM Komuter color

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/KTM Komuter Frietjes (talk) 15:45, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:KLRT line

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. ✗plicit 14:53, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

replaced by Module:Adjacent stations/KLRT Frietjes (talk) 14:54, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Lambrecht-surname

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Izno (talk) 07:15, 5 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There is no sourced article on the name Lambrecht as either given name or surname (although there is a list of nameholders in a dab page), so the connections in this template appear to be unsourced. The template adds unverified clutter to pages. An article on the name, with sources, would be more appropriate and could include a list of related names. PamD 06:05, 28 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).
Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2022_April_28&oldid=1087093071"