Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2021 July 22

< July 21	July 23 >

July 22

Template:1932–33 La Liga table

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:12, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:1932–33 La Liga table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused and unnecessary as the 1932–33 La Liga season article uses a different table with the same information. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:53, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete template not needed, as explained by the nominator. Joseph2302 (talk) 10:53, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 11:05, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Giant Snowman 11:06, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

MBTA Blue Line templates

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:08, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:MBTA Platform Layout Blue Line (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MBTA Platform Layout Blue Line/next (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MBTA Platform Layout Blue Line/previous (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MBTA Platform Layout Blue Line/doc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MBTA Blue Line Platform Layout (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:MBTA Platform Layout State Station (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Depreciated and long unused. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 22:43, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete all per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 22:50, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Ukrainian parliamentary election, 2007

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ukrainian parliamentary election, 2007 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is a simple table used only on one page. Should be subst and deleted. Gonnym (talk) 20:02, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete and Substitute per nomination. A single-use template for one purpose and one use. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:32, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Myrath

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:06, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Myrath (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Articles for only two albums which already link to one another as well as to the main article. Provides no additional aid in navigation. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 18:30, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Not enough for navigation. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --Muhandes (talk) 10:43, 23 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: template not needed for just two articles. This template is a recreation of a template that was deleted three months ago following discussion. Richard3120 (talk) 17:44, 28 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Surrey Storm

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:05, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Surrey Storm (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not needed, as almost none of the links relate directly to the team, but are just links to competitions (which are already in Template:Netball Superleague). For this template to be useful, you would want season articles about the team e.g. in Template:Team Bath (netball), but right now, the Surrey Storm isn't linking between articles about the Storm, so should be deleted. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:26, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nomination. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 20:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:WikiProject Bull riding

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 18:03, 30 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Bull riding (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is a template for a defunct WikiProject, Wikipedia:WikiProject Rodeo/Bull riding is literally a blank page, no articles were assessed and this template serves no function.

In the future should pages like this be speedied as an uncontroversial deletion or does it warrant discussion? Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:04, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Serve no function. --WikiCleanerMan (talk) 15:14, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. As for whether these should be speedy deleted, if the underlying WikiProject is a redlink (either because it was deleted at MfD or it never existed), then all dependent pages (templates, assessment categories, WP 1.0 bot logs, etc.) can be deleted as G8. I'm not seeing a clear speedy deletion criterion that applies to cases like this one where a WikiProject was merely marked defunct rather than deleted. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 15:33, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete not needed. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:58, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Keep, for now. Normally, the WikiProject banner of an inactive WikiProject will have its {{WPBannerMeta}} altered to {{WPBannerMeta/inactive}}, retaining the existing parameters. If the parent WikiProject page in WP: space gets deleted at MFD, the project banner then becomes eligible for G8. But we don't normally pre-emptively delete the template. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 16:12, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Unused and even if it were, it serves no purpose as the project is defunct and is blank. Gonnym (talk) 17:16, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Suriname national football team results

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template(s) or module(s) below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Frietjes (talk) 13:35, 29 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suriname national football team results (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Very unnecessary as the results article is already listed in the Suriname NFT template. KingSkyLord (talk | contribs) 04:56, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 12:39, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as the only blue linked articles are all heading to deleter/redirection at AFD... Giant Snowman 12:40, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as all the blue links are likely to be deleted, leaving just one valid link. That AfD is a foregone conclusion it seems. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:57, 22 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Delete I was planning to nominate this after after the other AfD was closed, however this seems to be mainly redundant on the outcome as noted above. Govvy (talk) 18:10, 25 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).