Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 17

< October 16	October 18 >

October 17[edit]

Template:Margaret Thatcher/birthplace[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) Pkbwcgs (talk) 08:54, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Margaret Thatcher/birthplace (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Basically unused template, used on only one page, and almost certainly can't be used anywhere else Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 18:24, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Subst & delete, or just delete. No need for this to be a template. PC78 (talk) 18:29, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Keep This template intricately employs XHTML syntax that can only clutter the main article source. Neveselbert (talk · contribs · email) 23:31, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- It's only used on one page, and, in my opinion, shouldn't even be used on said page. Even if it clutters the page's source, it shouldn't be kept as a template. Helloimahumanbeing (talk) 19:45, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
  - And there is no reason for all that extra HTML clutter. See my sandbox for a version where {{multiple image}} is used directly. Voila! Decluttered. -- Whpq (talk) 23:31, 21 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - The two images can be inserted without all the table clutter. -- Whpq (talk) 23:57, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - images should be in article, not in template. --Gonnym (talk) 08:54, 18 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Subst and delete Single-use templates are not permitted. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 00:57, 20 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Seoul Metropolitan Subway stations[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 27. Primefac (talk) 13:06, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Seoul_Metropolitan_Subway_stations (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:IMDB refimprove[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was Turn into template disambiguation page after proper replacement of current transclusions. (non-admin closure) --Trialpears (talk) 08:15, 29 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:IMDB refimprove (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Previously a redirect to {{Media IMDb refimprove}} but was converted to a template by an anon user about a year ago. Problem is that we also have {{BLP IMDb refimprove}} and {{BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} so simply restoring the redirect is not straightforward as the tilte is ambiguous and the template is used on a mix of articles. Perhaps we need a template dab page? PC78 (talk) 09:49, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - to be honest, that tag is completely useless as it states that an unreliable source is used. Instead of adding a cleanup template, just remove the source and either remove the sentence or add {{Citation needed}}. This is also relevant to {{BLP IMDb refimprove}}. Unlike {{BLP IMDb-only refimprove}} which is actually relevant as it states that the only source in the article is IMDB. --Gonnym (talk) 12:14, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
replace and turn into a template-dab like {{IMDb}}. Frietjes (talk) 17:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Security (Kurdistan Region)[edit]

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 October 26. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Security_(Kurdistan_Region) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Iraqi_Kurdistan_topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).