Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2019 October 26

< October 25	October 27 >

October 26

Template:Random portal component with nominate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was relisted on 2019 November 17. Primefac (talk) 03:34, 17 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Random_portal_component_with_nominate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Security (Kurdistan Region)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Iraqi Kurdistan topics. Reasonable request with no opposition. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 11:16, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Security (Kurdistan Region) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Iraqi Kurdistan topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:Security (Kurdistan Region) with Template:Iraqi Kurdistan topics.
Seems like it could be included instead? PPEMES (talk) 09:19, 17 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 21:17, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Line chart

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete after replacing all uses with {{Graph:Chart}} as appropriate. Primefac (talk) 16:56, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Line chart (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

{{Line chart}} (which is is powered by EasyTimeline) is redundant and inferior to {{Graph:Chart}} (which is powered by the Graph extension).

The most serious issue with {{line chart}} is that it doesn't display for readers on the mobile site (which accounts for half of English Wikipedia's traffic). {{Graph:Chart}} does display on mobile, has fewer restrictions and offers additional features such as labels for the x and y axes. Additionally, the aliasing with the EasyTimeline graphs is pretty horrible. {{Graph:Chart}} also uses a less complex syntax than {{Line chart}}, resulting is smaller page sizes.

The WMF want to remove EasyTimeline. MW:Extension:EasyTimeline says 'The Graph extension aims to replace this extension' and there's a ticket to do this (created by a WMF employee, I note) at phab:T137291. This is probably the least important reason to switch, but everything using EasyTimeline will at some point have to be migrated to another solution. 124.169.123.253 (talk) 21:12, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Redundant template using deprecated feature. * Pppery * _{it has begun...} 03:44, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Comment as translator of this template: I'm all for replacing it with a technically superior template, but if possible existing uses should be converted first, either into the new format or into an image. Sandstein 15:00, 28 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Sandstein, exsisting uses are always converted before deletion. ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 22:59, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:History of Christianity in India 52-1653

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was merge to Template:Indian Christianity. Reasonable request with no opposition. (non-admin closure) ‑‑Trialpears (talk) 11:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:History of Christianity in India 52-1653 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Indian Christianity (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:History of Christianity in India 52-1653 with Template:Indian Christianity.
Strange way to have a template like that. Due contents may be merged with Template:Indian Christianity. Actual text content, though, could probably be merged with the history section of the plain article Saint Thomas Christians. PPEMES (talk) 12:48, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 20:55, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Cricket centurions

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was keep. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 18:38, 1 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cricket centurions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

No links for navigation. Störm (talk) 15:05, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

Template:Impossible Princess tracks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).

The result of the discussion was delete. (non-admin closure) DannyS712 (talk) 00:19, 3 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Impossible Princess tracks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used in only one article. Can already navigate to all linked songs through the {{Kylie Minogue songs}} template. The full track listing can be viewed by linking to Impossible Princess. Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 05:15, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

delete, redundant navigation. Frietjes (talk) 11:49, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom, unnecessary. PC78 (talk) 13:02, 27 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review).