Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 2

< July 1	July 3 >

July 2

Template:Passed

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. WOSlinker (talk) 14:40, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Passed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Not passed (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

failed proposal. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Question What was the proposal? If no one answers, consider my vote to be deleted. 184.76.26.102 (talk) 12:27, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Partly sourced articles? Frietjes (talk) 16:21, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete Unused; no documentation on intended use. ---— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 00:27, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Todo-inline

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Todo-inline (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:42, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Indexer

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Indexer (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

given the limited usage and scope, should probably be simply userfied. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:11, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:OS coopl

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:20, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:OS coopl (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused frontend to {{gbmappingsmall}}. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:08, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NFL Notes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NFL Notes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

sparsely used template, which seems to be poor in terms of wp:accessibility and counter to the spirit of WP:COLLAPSE. plus, we have template:abbr for this sort of thing when it actually is just explanation of something which has been abbreviated. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:56, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:PSLFfooter

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PSLFfooter (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:52, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:RI villages source

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:21, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:RI villages source (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 22:49, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Section headings example

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Section headings example (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 20:53, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Redirect preload

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Redirect preload (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

why do we need this? 198.102.153.2 (talk) 20:48, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I assume there's an article wizard out there somewhere that uses this. -- 70.49.127.65 (talk) 03:13, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- It's used at Wikipedia:How to make a redirect. 82.132.139.201 (talk) 08:57, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete When you don't create a documentation page, your template gets deleted since no one knows what it's for. Simple as that. Creating the doc page is a 30-second step that could have avoided this discussion, assuming this template is actually used. 184.76.26.102 (talk) 12:26, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment That's a bad idea, in the general case. Lots of old templates have documentation on their talk pages, because doc pages are a newer concept than templates. Lot of helper templates only have documentation on the main template, so you'd break several systems with that kind of blanket deleting. 70.49.127.65 (talk) 04:09, 4 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Books of Torah

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Books of Torah (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Redundant to {{Books of the Bible}} (footer) and {{Tanakh OT}} (sidebar). —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 07:33, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as it is useful for Category:Torah and its sub-categories. – Fayenatic London 18:04, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
delete after replacing with {{Category tree|Torah books|depth=1}} in the categories. Frietjes (talk) 16:55, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Blokhus FC squad

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 12 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Blokhus FC squad (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unmaintained since one year and contains almost exclusively red links. Kq-hit (talk) 11:06, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - Template updated on 25th June 2012. --Pixi Uno (talk) 02:50, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISJAMMMY☆★ 23:01, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not enough bluelinks, NENAN. Giant Snowman 20:30, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:38, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

delete, first work on keeping the current squad section up to date, and writing articles about the players. as it stands right now, it only really links about 3 articles, and it's not clear that all of those are valid due to the lack of updates. Frietjes (talk) 21:07, 9 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.