Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 July 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

July 1

[edit]


The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete; deleted by Plastikspork (talk · contribs · blocks · protections · deletions · page moves · rights · RfA) AnomieBOT 04:03, 7 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ALeague WPD (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Another redundant copy of {{ALeague WSW}}, along with already listed {{ALeague WS}} (see this discussion). timsdad (talk) 00:01, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. timsdad (talk) 00:17, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge with {{subscription required}}Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:59, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:HighBeam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is shouting-out HighBeam in articles, often repeatedly. This is highly promotional and unwarranted. Most readers will not have an account to access the link, anyway, as a subscription is required. The highbeam url itself serves to indicate that the source is available there. This should be deleted and usages simply replaced with {{subscription required}}. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 21:27, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Wikilinks added (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Wikilink added (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

according to MOS Linking, we are supposed to avoid linking words within direct quotes. normally we tag section with <sup>...</sup> tags when there is a problem should be fixed. this, however, seems to say that there is no problem? it is visually disruptive, and I think we should just go with the MOS linking guidelines here and avoid linking within quotes. Frietjes (talk) 16:30, 23 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I agree it's visually disruptive, but maybe the solution is to make it not a superscript but just regular text. I think it is useful sometimes to wikilink within quotes when an unfamiliar concept or a concept that we otherwise want to wikilink to appears within the quotes but not elsewhere in the article. Therefore, perhaps it is the MOS that needs to change. Leucosticte (talk) 02:52, 24 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:17, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

  • Delete per nom. This is disruptive and against MOS. If you do wikilink, well, maybe, but don't shout about it. There's also a WP:SELFREF concern. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 21:31, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. I can't see the point of disrupting readers in this way. On extremely rare occasions, square-bracketed explanation could be added after a quotation if a link within it was within it in the first place (presumably from an online source) ... such as we do for highlighted ("[italics added]"). "Generally" was allowed into the guideline to provide a little flexibility in linking within quotations, given that they can carry significant disadvantages. Tony (talk) 12:31, 2 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete I see no reason to ever point out that Wikilinks were added. Doesn't the fact that some of the text is blue give enough of a sign? Ten Pound Hammer(What did I screw up now?) 18:58, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
  • Argh. Internal editorialising of this sort should be used as seldom as possible. What should really happen is that editors should be more firmly trouted for wikifying direct quotations against better sense. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 19:08, 5 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:55, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:AMEL rail start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused custom {{S-rail}} header, replaceable by standard templates {{S-start}} and {{S-rail|title=Athens Metro}}. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:54, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ISAP rail start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused custom {{S-rail}} header, replaceable by standard templates {{S-start}} and {{S-rail|title=ISAP}}. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TRAINOSE rail start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused custom {{S-rail}} header, replaceable by standard templates {{S-start}} and {{S-rail|title=TrainOSE}}. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:53, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Proastiakos rail start (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused custom {{S-rail}} header, replaceable by standard templates {{S-start}} and {{S-rail|title=Proastiakos}}. Secondarywaltz (talk) 16:57, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UEFA futsal under-21 teams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

only used on one article, where it is not needed. has not one single bluelink and wont likely become one Koppapa (talk) 08:22, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:48, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:52, 8 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Template:UEFA Futsal U-21 Championship (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

not needed. only one edition so far. no section on uefa website, probably abolished. template only has one redlink and is used only on one article Koppapa (talk) 08:21, 1 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ★☆ DUCKISPEANUTBUTTER☆★ 15:47, 3 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.