Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 3
September 3
[edit]- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:29, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
This template seems to be somehow related to Future GPX Cyber Formula, but I can't see any articles worthy of its presence. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:58, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:30, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Almost completely redlinked inter-template navbox. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:31, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Totally redlinked inter-template navbox. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 10:54, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:32, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
No need for a template that is in display in one article. Subject is not prone to vandalism of any kind. Digirami (talk) 02:29, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:35, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Infobox masquerading as navbox. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:18, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:40, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Data appears at Copa América#Results. Not needed in template space. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:12, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:41, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Copyright info is not supposed to be placed on image talk pages. This template is incorrect and unnecessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete It's not supposed to on talk pages so this template is moot.Curb Chain (talk) 02:59, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Delete - Copyright templates go under the "Licensing" header. --Σ talkcontribs 05:19, 5 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:42, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by table at List of parties to international copyright agreements. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:57, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:43, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Old, unused squad list navbox. Mostly superseded by {{Cork Football Team 2007}}, but unneeded regardless. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:50, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:44, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Cotw-todo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Old (2004). No longer needed. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:43, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete, no one seems to be attached to it. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:45, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
- Template:Countparams (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Unused meta-template. Well-made and well-intentioned but unused templates like this belong on meta, where other wikis can copy them as needed. We have no use for it here. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:38, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Looks like a testing template; how would we know if it's being used to test, then removed from the test-bed once the subject is ready for production? Dreadstar ☥ 00:42, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- Comment: This was a template I wrote a long time ago to test for an arbitrary number of parameters. It might be useful in a few situations (e.g., if you want to know if at least 4 of 6 parameters are non-empty). I'm not really attached to it either way. --Ludwigs2 01:16, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 23:46, 10 September 2011 (UTC)
Superseded by {{Council of Europe}}. Unused. I would redirect this, but the name is unhelpful, so a redirect would be unnecessary. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:34, 3 September 2011 (UTC)'
- Support All useful information in the more compact template, all extras on this table (such as euros) completely extraneous to the topic of the council of europe. Chipmunkdavis (talk) 06:06, 3 September 2011 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.