Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 September 4

< September 3	September 5 >

September 4

Template:Semi-active

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Wrong discussion venue. I suggest you be bold and move these templates yourself, making sure a redirect from the old name is retained. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Semi-active (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I am recommending that this template be renamed to {{Semi-active WikiProject}}. The current name is ambiguous as to its purpose and should be clarified. Kumioko (talk) 22:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue; this should be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here. TfD is only for deletion and merging. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 23:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Defunct

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Wrong discussion venue. I suggest you be bold and move these templates yourself, making sure a redirect from the old name is retained. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Defunct (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I would like to recommend this template be renamed to {{Defunct WikiProject}}. The current name is too ambiguous and should be clarified. Kumioko (talk) 22:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue; this should be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here. TfD is only for deletion and merging. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 23:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Inactive

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Wrong discussion venue. I suggest you be bold and move these templates yourself, making sure a redirect from the old name is retained. — This, that, and the other (talk) 07:57, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Inactive (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I would like to recommend that this template be renamed to {{Inactive WikiProject}}. I think the template in its current name is very ambiguous and needs to be clarified. Kumioko (talk) 22:46, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wrong venue; this should be listed at Wikipedia:Requested moves, not here. TfD is only for deletion and merging. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 23:25, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Suicide in the world

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Moved. A TFD discussion is not necessary for renaming templates; in future, be bold and do it yourself. — This, that, and the other (talk) 09:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Suicide in the world (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Rename to Template:Suicide by country. Better grammar. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 08:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Db-redirnone-notice

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:33, 16 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Db-redirnone-notice (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not a particularly helpful notification. The vast majority of G8 redirnone candidates are redirects to pages that are deleted. The creator cannot do anything about this. Using such a notification as this one suggests that the creator has a responsibility to ensure all the redirects he or she creates are continually valid and operable. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:10, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I think it is a good idea to notify somebody when we are speedy deleting a redirect they created. I have adjusted the template so it is more of a notification like Template:Db-nowcommons-notice rather than a warning. Yoenit (talk) 10:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Without wanting to sound argumentative, why do you think it is a good idea to do so? To take the axiom "Redirects are cheap" in another light, I don't think creators generally get especially sentimental about redirects, especially dead ones. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:42, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - Most of them won't care, but there will be plenty that do. To turn the question around: Why do you think we should not be allowed to notify them? Yoenit (talk) 16:27, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - Boilerplate notices are annoying. We should be careful not to overuse them. Deleting redirects which are broken anyway is not the sort of thing that we really need to go posting big notices on people's talk pages for. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) - talk 20:00, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, notifications certainly aren't pointless, but for broken redirects it's a bit much. --The Evil IP address (talk) 14:20, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, per "the evil IP address", notifying for broken redirects does seem to be a bit much. Frietjes (talk) 15:52, 13 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Troll Series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:38, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Troll Series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This is not needed and if not actually malformed, not exactly a well-styled template. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The template is not particularly useful, and its current transclusions are bad usages as well. -Odie5533 (talk) 16:28, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CTB minutes/01-1959-01

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Withdrawn. Now in use. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:11, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CTB minutes/01-1959-01 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused citation template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:20, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. This was used as a reference for SR 359: http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=State_highways_serving_Virginia_state_institutions&diff=prev&oldid=82368781 At some point SR 359 was moved to List of primary state highways in Virginia shorter than one mile but the history was not. I've fixed this error. --NE2 02:48, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Countrylink colour

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:33, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Countrylink colour (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Old, unused color template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:06, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Template is no longer used, and not useful either. It is shorter to copy/paste the code than it is to remember the template's name. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cricket team roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:32, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cricket team roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All very fine, but unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:03, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Template is no longer used and the information is perhaps better displayed using wikitables which change depending on what information is pertinent to a given page. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:32, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Createuser

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Gone away. Doesn't look like this day of TFD will have much of a backlog in 7 days' time, at this rate. — This, that, and the other (talk) 11:29, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Createuser (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

User message that implies creating an account is compulsory, or editing as an IP is frowned upon. — This, that, and the other (talk) 02:01, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete It's not used. Although if it was used, it would create problems.Curb Chain (talk) 03:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Crime in South America

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Crime in South America (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused. {{South America topic|Crime}} or {{Americas topic|Crime}} can be used instead. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:58, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused and superseded. I didn't know about the topic templates, thanks for introducing them to me. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:38, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CrossLoop

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:39, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CrossLoop (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Appears to be a copy of {{Infobox software}}. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:56, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Template is unused and was never necessary. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:34, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Crowleybooks

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:40, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Crowleybooks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The article Works of Aleister Crowley seems to be sufficient. Unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Unused template that is huge and should never have been placed on articles. --Odie5533 (talk) 16:36, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Csd-tip

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:37, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Csd-tip (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Boilerplate text that is apparently supposed to be placed on AFD discussion pages, but would be better given as a personal talk page message. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete unnecessaryCurb Chain (talk) 03:50, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nominator. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Csd-why

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete per what I said, non-admin closure. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 06:48, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Csd-why (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Non-standard deletion template. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:39, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete nonstandard; unprofessionalCurb Chain (talk) 03:49, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pointless - already covered by all the orther deletion methods. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 08:44, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
So the notice that lets one know that something has been nominated for deletion is itself up for deletion. Interesting. -- $Σ talk contribs$ 17:47, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete redundant in function to {{afd}}, {{db}}, etc. Using this would be completely against precedent and policy. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Otters want attention)} 06:01, 6 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Current-PWEOTW

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Deleted per WP:G7. — This, that, and the other (talk) 08:12, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Current-PWEOTW (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Should be deleted as a by-product of Wikipedia:Miscellany for deletion/Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Editor of the week. — This, that, and the other (talk) 01:02, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete defunctCurb Chain (talk) 03:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

You guys can definitely get rid of this one, haha. I, regrettably, am the creator of it (years ago) and have zero objection to having it deleted. Thanks! iMatthew / talk 05:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cynicism

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 00:36, 11 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cynicism (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Presumably for userspace essays, but unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 00:40, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not used. violates WP:NPOV Curb Chain (talk) 03:45, 4 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - We have {{essay}} for that, and the wording for {{essay}} is vague enough to cover almost everything. -- $Σ talk contribs$ 05:09, 5 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per This, that, and the other and Σ. ...Dynamic|cimanyD... (talk|klat) ☺ 14:06, 7 September 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.