Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 6

< December 5	December 7 >

December 6

Template:Db-unpatrolled

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. CSD G7: One author who has requested deletion or blanked the page: see Blanchardb's comment below. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Db-unpatrolled (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Bug has been fixed, see bugzilla:30368. We don't need this any more. N Y Kevin @035, i.e. 23:49, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. When I created this template, I stated that its use would be as a temporary workaround, until the bug is fixed. Now that it's fixed, the template no longer serves a purpose. -- Blanchardb -^{Me•MyEars•MyMouth}- timed 02:55, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:South Alabama Jaguars roster

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:17, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:South Alabama Jaguars roster (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

As an intended single-use template, it should not exist. I have substituted its content onto 2011 South Alabama Jaguars football team. Jweiss11 (talk) 23:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete as proposed. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Content has already been transferred to 2011 South Alabama Jaguars football team, where it should have been in the first place. Template no serves a purpose. Dirtlawyer1 (talk) 09:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:2005 med

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:18, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2005 med (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

replaced by template:FlagIOC2athlete. Frietjes (talk) 22:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment It seems that it does the same as Template:FlagPASOathlete, which hasn't been replaced. So you might consider replacing that one as well. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 10:44, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Asian Youth Games Medal Counts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Asian Youth Games Medal Counts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

no useful navigation. Frietjes (talk) 22:10, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Comment it looks like its built for future expansion, since the next games are scheduled for 2013, and {{Asian Games Medal Counts}} also exists. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 10:46, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Vintilă Vodă

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:20, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vintilă Vodă (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Beceni, Buzău (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

unused and provides no usable navigation. there used to be a neighboring communes section, but since that would only make sense in the parent article, that has been moved to an 8-way navigation in the parent articles. Frietjes (talk) 16:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete; unused orphans that seem weird and going nowhere. I hlist'd the one just as part of doing the category; didn't want to leave a poor example behind. Alarbus (talk) 16:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - we won't have articles on the villages (they're covered in the commune articles), while the neighboring communes can also be mentioned in-text as needed. This is an experiment that, as noted, seems headed nowhere. - Biruitorul ^Talk 19:57, 14 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Foreign character

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was relisted on Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 18. Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:23, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Foreign character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Foreignchars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Template:Foreignchars2 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Links Incorporated International Presidents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:21, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Links Incorporated International Presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Navbox in which none of the listed articles have articles.

delete, the information is now in The_Links,_Incorporated#Presidents. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:18, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:USR2TX

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:USR2TX (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 12:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused, superseded by {{jct}}. --Kinu ^t/_c 23:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete as a T3 (unused and superceded by another template). Imzadi 1979 → 00:09, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - Per Imzadi1979. Dough 48 72 01:12, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Tagged Bulwersator (talk) 10:27, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ultimate Alien

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:22, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ultimate Alien (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused infobox Bulwersator (talk) 12:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

delete as redundant to template:infobox character. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:20, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
tagged Bulwersator (talk) 15:00, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Ultimate Fighter Bracket

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ultimate Fighter Bracket (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 12:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Articles for The Ultimate Fighter seasons use use regular brackets depending which vary on the structure of the season. Thus a single bracket for TUF as this template provides is of little use. --TreyGeek (talk) 16:04, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User SwedishRankInflation

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:52, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User SwedishRankInflation (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless essay unrelated to wikipedia, marked as POV. Unused. Bulwersator (talk) 12:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - basically redundant to Military ranks of the Swedish Armed Forces, which already contains this information. Robofish (talk) 22:39, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:User The Jimbo Finds Me Offensive Barnstar of Infamy

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedied by author's request. Peridon (talk) 13:53, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:User The Jimbo Finds Me Offensive Barnstar of Infamy (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless, ugly Bulwersator (talk) 12:26, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Troll series

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:53, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Troll series (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

"United States distributors were skeptical about the film's ability to succeed as a standalone picture and renamed it Troll 2 in an attempt to market it as a sequel to the 1986 Empire Pictures film Troll. The two films, however, have no connection" Bulwersator (talk) 10:46, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient links to justify a navbox. Robofish (talk) 22:36, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Tuva task force

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:54, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Tuva task force (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless, unfinished Bulwersator (talk) 10:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The Tuva task force uses Template:WikiProject_Central_Asia. Please delete. --Stacey Doljack Borsody (talk) 08:16, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Truecomp

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy per G7. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Truecomp (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 10:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TrbNM

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:55, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TrbNM (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 10:35, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused and presumably unwanted. Robofish (talk) 22:33, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Transjakarta halts

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Transjakarta halts (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 10:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused and presumably unwanted. Robofish (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Traditional music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Traditional music (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unfinished navbox Bulwersator (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Track listing/changelog

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Track listing/changelog (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Template:Track_listing&action=history Bulwersator (talk) 10:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, redundant to history page. Robofish (talk) 22:32, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:So-called

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:So-called (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:37, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, bad idea for a template: 'so-called' is specifically discouraged by WP:ALLEGED. Robofish (talk) 22:31, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Snote

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy per G7. 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:21, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Snote (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I'm the author and I support the deletion of this template. I must have created it by mistake a while back while I was trying to create User:EpochFail/Snote. The concept needed to be developed with my user script User:EpochFail/Wikignome in order to actually be useful before becoming a proper template. --EpochFail^(talk|work) 14:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Soccer icon3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Soccer icon3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 09:36, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused and presumably unwanted. Robofish (talk) 22:30, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sn1

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sn1 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Useless, unused Bulwersator (talk) 09:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused and presumably unwanted. Robofish (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Skull side

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skull side (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unfinished ("NOTE: This image map needs to have its links specified correctly") Bulwersator (talk) 09:34, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused and presumably unwanted. Robofish (talk) 22:29, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:SkyTemplate

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SkyTemplate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation (discussion from February) Bulwersator (talk) 09:33, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sittuyin diagram

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sittuyin diagram (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 09:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused and presumably unwanted. Robofish (talk) 22:28, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Skyline 199

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per CSD G7. Rcsprinter (rap) 21:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Skyline 199 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless as Skyline 199 is redirected to List of bus routes in Derbyshire Bulwersator (talk) 09:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete No longer needed, page was deleted and redirected, as the templates creator I can say I'm happy for it to be deleted. Rcsprinter (constabulary) 16:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Slayerdisc

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Slayerdisc (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, unused and unnecessary. Robofish (talk) 22:26, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Singles category

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete

Template:Singles category (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:28, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Not useless. Rich Farmbrough, 09:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC).[reply]

Without anything in the way of categorisation, documentation, or use in the wild over a year after its creation, this is as close to useless as a template can be, really. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:06, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Assuming that this was created for singles released by musical acts (a la Template:Albums category), those categories are for songs by the act and there is no subcategorization of an artist's singles. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars (talk) 07:52, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Sidhartha Shankar

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was move without redirect, then delete per A7 Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sidhartha Shankar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Poor quality article hidden as template. Move to mainspace and prod it? Bulwersator (talk) 09:27, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Move to mainspace and tag with {{A7}}. Robofish (talk) 22:25, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
A7 per Robofish. Autobiography. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 03:08, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Shopping district

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shopping district (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, broken, without good documentation Bulwersator (talk) 09:19, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete it is dependant on a deleted template, that was deleted in 2010. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 07:22, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per G8. — Train2104 (talk • contribs) 03:09, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Small clock

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy deletion. Author requested deletion of work he or she created with a sockpuppet. Jesse Viviano (talk) 11:26, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Small clock (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, one of 18288282883889291911 ways to display date. Userfy? Bulwersator (talk) 09:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete (G7) I created this, and don't need it. Double sharp (talk) 03:21, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Theology Nav

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:58, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Theology Nav (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unfinished Bulwersator (talk) 09:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - even if it was expanded and finished, we already have adequate navigational templates and categories for this purpose. Robofish (talk) 22:24, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Thermo sign convention

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thermo sign convention (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I created this stupid template when I started editing Wikipedia. It's better deleted. --Netheril96 (talk) 00:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Tagged Bulwersator (talk) 15:08, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Thessaloniki Bus Route Map (No. 78)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:13, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Thessaloniki Bus Route Map (No. 78) (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Map of bus route without article Bulwersator (talk) 09:14, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - not needed until the article is created. Robofish (talk) 22:23, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:They

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:They (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless template Bulwersator (talk) 09:12, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, my mistake Bulwersator (talk) 13:02, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
It gets substituted, so determining whether or not it's been used (or is used) is impossible. It also has at least two companion templates that perform similar functionality. *shrug* Keep. —Locke Cole • t • c 15:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment why nominate this separate from {{Their}} and {{Theirs}} ? 70.24.248.23 (talk) 04:39, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- WP:BEANS. Alarbus (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Unused? How can you tell? – Useless? Au contraire. (The triplet needs categories, though.) -- Michael Bednarek (talk) 05:24, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
keep. used, useful, interesting. Alarbus (talk) 05:33, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep per ^^ and ^; I've categorised this in category:Typing-aid templates, btw. ~Alison C. (Crazytales) 15:19, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- And I added {Subst only} Bulwersator (talk) 13:04, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:They Might Be Giants

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was ops Bulwersator (talk) 17:51, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:They Might Be Giants (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy close, wrong forum. This is a userbox, and from the top of WP:TFD: 'Userboxes should be listed at WP:Miscellany for deletion, regardless of the namespace in which they reside.' Robofish (talk) 22:22, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:TakenPage

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfied 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:TakenPage (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Used only on one unused template, suggests ownership of articles and encourages keeping unfinished pages outside of userspace. Bulwersator (talk) 09:11, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to user-space. Magister Scienta ^talk (Editor Review) 18:38, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:ThingsToDo

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was userfied 198.102.153.2 (talk) 23:22, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ThingsToDo (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless, unfinished template Bulwersator (talk) 09:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Moved to my userspcace. Magister Scienta ^talk (Editor Review) 17:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Things named after

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Things named after (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless template Bulwersator (talk) 09:03, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - unused, and clearly a bad idea for a disambiguation hatnote. Generally 'things named after someone' should be listed in their article itself. If there really are too many of them to list there, the existing disambiguation templates are adequate for the purpose. Robofish (talk) 22:20, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:The airborne toxic event

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:The airborne toxic event (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused navbox with 2 links Bulwersator (talk) 08:58, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - insufficient articles to justify a navbox. Robofish (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:FOSS personalities

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 16:12, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:FOSS personalities (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Inclusion criteria are more-or-less arbitrary and it's hard to imagine that anyone is actually navigating from one of these to the other. If individual FOSS personalities are genuinely related to one another, they will be linked within their respective articles. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 06:09, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

See also the previous TfD. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 11:16, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep The template has become an interesting way to explore the diversity of the FOSS movement. Links within the articles on each person, do not do this. The process on the talk page, for including and not including people, has been working. There are templates with far more entries on them. The template might want to be enhanced with categories:, developer, entrepreneur, activist, founder, etc.; though some people fit in more then one of these. Lentower (talk) 17:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- This isn't 1983, and "FOSS" is far, far too large a subject now for there to be any real hope of consensus as to who is a "key figure" and who isn't. This is just a subjective grab-bag. Categorisation adequately handles the use case here. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:19, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  - The title on this template is Key figures in the history of free software, so it's not looking at the present (BTW, this is a criteria). The length of time and breath of action is exactly why a key figures templates is needed and works. Categories are not widely used by readers. Their UI design is poor compared to this template, and there is much less editorial perspective and choice than in most templates. These key figures all have Wikipedia articles, which show that they were key figures in the devlopment of FOSS. Lentower (talk) 14:12, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    - As do you and user:RussNelson (the other primary maintainer of said template), who aren't included in this template even though you've both got articles and are both best known within this sphere. What exactly is the entry criterion, if figures who have biographies here which plainly establish that they are notable primarily for their work in FOSS are not included, while the template contains numerous figures whose primary work in "FOSS" predates the GNU Manifesto? Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 14:45, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
      - Software that met and pursued the goals of FOSS existed before the GNU Manifesto. Though it's moot, I don't see anyone on the list as you claim numerous figures whose primary work in "FOSS" predates the GNU Manifesto - could you please list them, and why they are not a "Key Figure in the History of FOSS"? I was briefly on this template, but the consensus of editors decided that Stallman was the Key Figure at the GNU Project, and I didn't need to be included. And consensus is the way this template is edited, and the basis of all editing here on Wikipedia. Lentower (talk) 17:15, 9 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - this would be more appropriate as a category (something like Category:People in the free software movement) than as a template. The navbox implies that this is an exhaustive and exclusive list of all the major figures involved in free software, which it of course isn't. It's difficult to create a definitive list of something so subjective as 'free software personalities', and not clear who would want to navigate using such a list. A category is the way to go instead. Robofish (talk) 22:17, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- Why not have both? It gives our readers more choice in navigating around our encyclopedia. Lentower (talk) 18:50, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete This is, and always will be, a random collection of people.

Why is Mark Shuttleworth listed, but many others like Daniel Robbins, Patrick Volkerding or Klaus Knopper who also founded their own distributions are not listed?
Should Matthew Dillon (who founded yet another BSD fork) be included?
And since the list already (even without Matthew Dillon) contains so many people creating their own flavour of the (by userbase) relatively obscure BSD, what about people like Andrew S. Tanenbaum or Michael Phipps who created on own open source operating system?
And these are just examples from the kernel/distribution area. There is no clearly defined list of Key figures in the history of free software, and it is not the business of Wikipedia to judge whether the author of Minix or a founder of FreeBSD is one (I'd argue Linux wouldn't exist without Minix, while FreeBSD is and always was just some obscure OS without much influence on the non-BSD world...).

--Steinhöfer (talk) 21:21, 17 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject KYOVA Region

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject KYOVA Region (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Recommend deletion. This template was replaced with WikiProject United States. Kumioko (talk) 00:48, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly useless. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:51, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject US State Legislatures

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject US State Legislatures (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This template is deprecated and no longer used. It was subsumed by WikiProject United States some time ago. Kumioko (talk) 00:43, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Clearly useless. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 01:50, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject District of Columbia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject District of Columbia (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, (almost) unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Asian Americans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Asian Americans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:32, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject United States governors

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject United States governors (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject United States Government

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject United States Government (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, (almost) unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject U.S. counties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 15:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject U.S. counties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject South Carolina

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject South Carolina (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, (almost) unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:31, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think we need to hang onto this a little while longer. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - This is useful as a redirect for those who aren't aware that WikiProject South Carolina uses a different template. Spyder_Monkey (Talk) 01:39, 12 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Shreveport

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep for now Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Shreveport (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep - I think we need to hang onto this a little while longer. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Franco-Americans

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:51, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Franco-Americans (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject FBI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject FBI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject Superfund

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 14:47, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject Superfund (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:30, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject American television

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:27, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject American television (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Guys I see the template has simply been surpassed - A G6 Technical deletion would apply. Could just add {{db-g6|rationale=Surpassed Parameters of this template have been integrated into Template:WikiProject United States}}.Moxy (talk) 04:01, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:WikiProject American music

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete - Nabla (talk) 13:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WikiProject American music (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, unused —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 00:29, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I agree this could be deleted. --Kumioko (talk) 00:41, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
G7 as a creator. JJ98 (Talk / Contributions) 23:17, 6 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.