Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 5

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

December 5

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete DonateWP and no consensus for Donate. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:33, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Donate (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:DonateWP (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Long since replaced by other donation advertising. The few existing transclusions could be subst'd. WOSlinker (talk) 23:26, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Infobox Futurama character (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

redundant to {{infobox character}}. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 21:14, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Athletics national champions (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Almost all of the pages that this links to are red links and the template itself provides no infomation. I do not, therefore, see the use of it and I think that it should be deleted. Oddbodz (talk) 21:00, 27 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep I see this more as a work in progress than a useless template (1 in 5 links are blue). The notability of the lists have not been challenged and I think this kind of template is the most logical, user-friendly way of linking them. Saying that, I don't think any specific editor personally has their sights on creating the missing articles in the short term. SFB 22:35, 29 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:23, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Did you mean poorly connected when you said "disparate"? Navigation boxes are certainly not meant to connect disparate subjects. I think works in progress can be acceptable when they are the most user-friendly method for a reasonable body of work (the only alternative here would be 11 articles in the "see also" section). SFB 16:36, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus, mostly due to the nomination only including a single template, and not the entire group. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:54, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Raiders1996DraftPicks (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Being picked in the draft for a team in a particular year is not a close connection that warrants a navbox. The AFL draft is done by year, not by eventual team (e.g. {{2009 AFL Draft}}).

Also currently unused. — This, that, and the other (talk) 06:33, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 19:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was merge Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 04:56, 19 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)
Template:Anonymous-EU (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Propose merging Template:PD-EU-no author disclosure with Template:Anonymous-EU.
Someone else before me had proposed it. I just happened to surf it. Honestly, processing a merging nomination for templates is not an easy job for a casual user. Anyway, they both look the same to me; the difference would be the flag addition in one template. So I don't know what else to say, but {{tfm}} should be required, not {{merge}}, for templates, so discussion is located here instead of any template's talk page. Gh87 (talk) 12:24, 30 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 18:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 05:44, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Uw-rickroll (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

This user warning template seems to be solving a problem that doesn't exist. I don't believe that the rickrolling of users is prevalent enough to warrant a templated warning for that action, and it almost seems like a WP:BEANS template that could encourage this behavior by warning against it. Logan Talk Contributions 18:04, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Speedy delete. (CSD G7: One author who has requested deletion: See below.) JamesBWatson (talk) 11:44, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Rhode Island State Prisons (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template for which all links to be navigated are red links, and have been since 2004; articles are unlikely to ever be created. They are listed, with no additional information, at List of Rhode Island state prisons. The links should probably be redirected there also. bd2412 T 16:22, 5 December 2011 (UTC)

Delete. I created this way back - no longer useful. Neutralitytalk 03:04, 10 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:SiteAt (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless template without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 16:03, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:35, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Simplecalendar (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template. Userfy? Bulwersator (talk) 16:00, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete.

Template:Signatureshort (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless template Bulwersator (talk) 15:57, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy delete by creator: Wow, do I not remember why I did that... I've CSD G7 tagged it to speed the process along. Regards, TransporterMan (TALK) 16:10, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete, not in use, and no indication that this is desired given how long it has been unused. Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:36, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shortcat (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless template Bulwersator (talk) 15:55, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:37, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Shetland Islands places (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, unfinished template Bulwersator (talk) 15:51, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sheopur district topics (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Bulwersator (talk) 15:50, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:PD-Smith (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Usused template, there is no need for duplicating commons templates. Bulwersator (talk) 15:48, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:38, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:ZeptoLab (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unnecessary template. Of the 9 links 3 are red links, the two subsidiaries point to the same article, 3 of the links at the games point to the same article and the last one is a useless link. Besides that it containes mistakes (Electronic Arts is the parent company, not a subsidiary). With so few links is also looks a case of WP:NENAN. Night of the Big Wind talk 05:46, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was keep Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:40, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Salvador albums (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

I don't think that a navigation box with 4 links is needed in the encyclopedia... | helpdןǝɥ | 03:27, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:09, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was no consensus Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Incomplete table (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Deprecated, very few transclusions —Justin (koavf)TCM04:59, 25 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]


Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 02:47, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 16:42, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Directors General of UNESCO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Bulwersator (talk) 10:06, 21 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

  • Unused, but not unusable. There does not seem to be a substitute providing the same information, so why not just place this on the articles for which it is relevant? bd2412 T 19:05, 21 November 2011 (UTC)

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 03:06, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

This template is substituted here Bulwersator (talk) 15:53, 5 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.