Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2011 December 7

< December 6	December 8 >

December 7

Template:Use ymd dates

This discussion was subject to a deletion review on 2019 April 24.
For an explanation of the process, see Wikipedia:Deletion review.

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:45, 18 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Use ymd dates (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The template is only used on some 3–4 articles, in which the YYYY-MM-DD format is even used in prose, something that is uncommon in English. The ISO format may generally be used in tables or references, but this usage alone shouldn't warrant a maintenance template and its associated category tree. Unlike the "dmy" and "mdy" template, which actually have some sort of usage, this one's really pointless. In the articles that use this date format in lists, the template should just be removed, where it's used in prose another date format should be chosen. The Evil IP address (talk) 21:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Previously nominated 2011 September 8 Result was No Consensus. No comment on deletion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 06:21, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep per discussion at Wikipedia:Templates_for_discussion/Log/2011_September_8#Template:Use_ymd_dates. A bit pointless nomination I suppose? Nsaa (talk) 09:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- The reasoning behind that TfD is completely different. In fact, I haven't nominated the other two templates for a reason. --The Evil IP address (talk) 11:19, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
"Keep per" arguments are bogus given that the previous TfD was a multiple nom largely concentrating on the whole purpose of the formatting templates. This one simply nominates a template which is probably actually harmful, as it implies that using a date format that most readers are unfamiliar with is fine. MOSVAR does not mean "use whatever format you wish". Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:45, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I don't see why we shouldn't specify that lists/tables should be using a particular date format, since presumably some bots can autocorrect some errors in tables/lists. 76.65.128.198 (talk) 07:14, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- In which case the bot should not change ISO date formats in lists or tables. --The Evil IP address (talk) 16:32, 11 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
delete, we don't use ymd format in prose, and bots shouldn't touch sortable columns, so no need for this. Frietjes (talk) 16:38, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Joseph V. Paterno Award

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Joseph V. Paterno Award (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

The award was discontinued after one year, so Frank Beamer will be the only possible name in this navbox. Eagles 24/7 (C) 20:40, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. Navboxes that link one article only are pointless. Jrcla2 (talk) 20:45, 13 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cat logo head

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cat logo head (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Bulwersator (talk) 15:17, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Cat nomore

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:52, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Cat nomore (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, useless template without documentation. In this case there is no need for YA template, this kind of issue may be resolved using talk page. Bulwersator (talk) 15:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, many articles actually could use more rather than fewer categories. --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Comment I've seen some articles that have been category bombed, so some articles could use less categories. (some editors seem to think every parent to every category attached to the article should be added... some others think that every sentence of an article should be categorized appropriately, even if the article isn't about that subject) 70.24.248.23 (talk) 06:22, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Overcategorisation is not actually a problem on article-level; it's a problem at category-level, which then needs to be addressed by mass pruning. So no real need for a cleanup tag on individual articles. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:47, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Categories solo in articles

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete

Template:Categories solo in articles (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created it for Template:Hero of the Soviet Union and Template:CS Medal of Honor, but now it isn't in use in any template.--Areguni (talk) 20:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category Kansas counties

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:55, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category Kansas counties (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template Bulwersator (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Category namespace

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:56, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Category namespace (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 15:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: What is it's possible use even? Don't know why I got notified. ~~Ebe123~~ → report on my contribs. 20:34, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
- http://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=Template:Category_namespace&action=history Bulwersator (talk) 05:28, 8 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, this template's purpose appears to be to add a {{db-catempty}} when a category is empty. As this is trivial code and is actually used in quite a lot of templates, this template doesn't appear to be necessary. --The Evil IP address (talk) 21:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Caution3

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Caution3 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused template with unclear purpose (it contains note "This template may have no transclusions, because it is used as part of a less-active Wikipedia process, or for some other reason." but process is not specified). Template:Caution1 or Template:Caution2 were never created. Bulwersator (talk) 15:14, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Jerichoepisodes

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:57, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jerichoepisodes (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused; all links have been merged into Template:Jerichonav. Barsoomian (talk) 13:10, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:CentralAfricanmusic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:58, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:CentralAfricanmusic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of {{Africa in topic|music of}} Bulwersator (talk) 11:51, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian federal election, 1984

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 1984 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of Category:1984 Canadian federal election templates Bulwersator (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created it as an excuse to name Template:Canadian federal election, 1984A with an A, but I guess we don't need it. 117Avenue (talk) 13:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian federal election, 1988

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 1988 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of Category:1988 Canadian federal election templates Bulwersator (talk) 10:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created it as an excuse to name Template:Canadian federal election, 1988A with an A, but I guess we don't need it. 117Avenue (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian federal election, 1993

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 1993 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of Category:1993 Canadian federal election templates Bulwersator (talk) 10:43, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created it as an excuse to name Template:Canadian federal election, 1993A with an A, but I guess we don't need it. 117Avenue (talk) 13:46, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian federal election, 1980

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 1980 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of Category:1980 Canadian federal election templates Bulwersator (talk) 10:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created it as an excuse to name Template:Canadian federal election, 1980A with an A, but I guess we don't need it. 117Avenue (talk) 13:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Canadian federal election, 1979

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Canadian federal election, 1979 (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Duplicate of Category:1979 Canadian federal election templates Bulwersator (talk) 10:45, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. I created it as an excuse to name Template:Canadian federal election, 1979A with an A, but I guess we don't need it. 117Avenue (talk) 13:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Names of God in Islam

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 01:59, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Names of God in Islam (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, links to disambigs, there is no need to navigate in a single article Bulwersator (talk) 10:35, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Nation in topic

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete per G7. Frietjes (talk) 16:15, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Nation in topic (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused generic navbox. Bulwersator (talk) 10:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - I created this as one of the first templates, back in 2005, and it's no longer in use, having been superseded by other templates. Warofdreams talk 10:44, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NCAA Men's Basketball Playoffs

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NCAA Men's Basketball Playoffs (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 10:32, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NCAA Season 86 juniors' beach volleyball

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:02, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NCAA Season 86 juniors' beach volleyball (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without article to place it, without sources Bulwersator (talk) 10:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NCBI Taxonomy link

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was speedy delete

Template:NCBI Taxonomy link (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 10:31, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

No objection from me (the original author). Thanks... Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 19:47, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NCTCOG census tract

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NCTCOG census tract (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 10:30, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:NCI

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:00, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:NCI (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Unused, without documentation Bulwersator (talk) 10:29, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

Template:Phi Beta Sigma Presidents

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork _―Œ^(talk) 02:07, 15 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Phi Beta Sigma Presidents (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

20+ entries and only 1 has an article. Useless. GrapedApe (talk) 04:07, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.