Wikipedia:Picture peer review/Cannabis sativa
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/a/a8/Illustration_Cannabis_sativa0.jpg/250px-Illustration_Cannabis_sativa0.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/c/cc/Illustration_Cannabis_sativa0_clean.jpg/250px-Illustration_Cannabis_sativa0_clean.jpg)
![](http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Cannabis_sativa_Koehler_drawing.jpg/250px-Cannabis_sativa_Koehler_drawing.jpg)
Please bear with me, as this is the first time I have nominated a picture for any sort of feedback. My interest and goal is to successfully nominate an image of cannabis for featured picture status. All three of the images here are of high resolution, are compelling, have free licenses, add value to cannabis-related articles, and are accurate. The second is an alternate of the first, with a white background. The third is a similar illustration, but by a different author. Trying to determine which of these, if any, are eligible for FP status. Any of the three images could be used for the Cannabis or Cannabis (drug) articles, or even for one of the many additional cannabis-related articles that currently exist on Wikipedia. A similar illustration of a pomegranate with FP status can be found here. Thanks!
- Articles this image appears in
- Cannabis, Cannabis (drug)
- Creator
- Otto Wilhelm Thomé, 1885
- Suggested by
- Another Believer (Talk) 04:30, 12 January 2010 (UTC)
- Comments
- I think that the obvious stains and other deterioration in the image would definitely count against it. With some restoration it might go further. Mostlyharmless (talk) 06:07, 18 January 2010 (UTC)
- Are you referring to just the first image, or all three? --Another Believer (Talk) 08:21, 19 January 2010 (UTC)
- I think the first image would have a good chance if properly restored. The restoration on the two alternates is rather sloppy; there's obvious detail loss, especially in the text, and the contrasty colors look suspect. Thegreenj 02:06, 30 January 2010 (UTC)
- Seconder
- Conclusion
Restore it and it has a chance. Makeemlighter (talk) 07:28, 15 April 2010 (UTC)