Jump to content

Wikipedia:Historical archive/Logs/Centralized discussion template log

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

2006 Sep 01

[edit]

2006 Sep 2

[edit]

2006 Sep 5

[edit]

2006 Sept 8

[edit]

2006 Sept 10

[edit]

2006 Sep 13

[edit]

2006 Sep 14

[edit]

2006 Sept 18

[edit]

2006 Sep 20

[edit]

2006 Sep 25

[edit]
  • There are several entries in the template that have concluded, or have been accepted as "historical" (as opposed to those still in contention), such as spoiler warnings, and the admin accountability poll. I might suggest that someone go through and double check all the entries list on the template to see how "current" they are. - jc37 18:01, 25 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

well we have to clean out the 'old' section some time, there's really no point in having things on there for several months, the section should really be called, and iirc used to be called, 'recently concluded'

>Radiant< 09:54, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]
How did these discussions conclude? Was any consensus reached? If so, what? John Reid 01:58, 30 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 04

[edit]

2006 Oct 9

[edit]

State Highways straw poll is closed. Xoloz 17:06, 9 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 11

[edit]
My feeling is that discussions should not recycle through Cent template. A discussion may stand indefinitely on a Cent subpage but we cannot give air to it on the template forever. Unless there's a new development, I intend to pull this onto Old Discussions in a week or two and pull it off entirely a week or two after that -- and if it comes back a 4th time, sorry but it's already had it's fair share of air. John Reid 11:51, 11 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 13

[edit]
John Reid 06:14, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 16

[edit]
John Reid 13:06, 15 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
  • Moved Ref reform to old discussions from the straw poll section. Radiant has added the historical tag to the poll, so I figure it's not a current poll. I wasn't sure whether old straw polls go in the old discussions section, but someone can always fix that if it's wrong. Hiding Talk 18:04, 16 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]
Further discussion of makeover moved to Template talk:Cent#One-column makeover.

2006 Oct 18

[edit]

Fixed link to Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Protecting children's privacy. --Cpt. Morgan (Reinoutr) 23:29, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 24

[edit]

Added Wikipedia:Blanking to 'Discussions'. --Sam Blanning(talk) 19:41, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 25

[edit]

Added a link to Wikipedia:Permanent semi-protection of official policy pages. John254 02:26, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 28

[edit]

Added (revived) to Wikipedia:Fair use/Fair use images in lists. Renata 02:41, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have removed Wikipedia:Permanent semi-protection of official policy pages as this amendment has been enacted. John254 02:48, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I have restored Wikipedia:Permanent semi-protection of official policy pages, as this proposed amendment apparently needs more discussion. John254 15:53, 28 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Oct 29

[edit]

30 October 2006

[edit]

November 4, 2006

[edit]

7 November 2006

[edit]

8 November 2006

[edit]

2006 Nov 11

[edit]

2006 Nov 15

[edit]

2006 Nov 17

[edit]

Rm the following; we no longer keep old stuff in template by default:

Move State route naming conventions to /Conclusions: reward for success in achieving consensus.

John Reid ° 03:46, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Nov 22

[edit]

2006 Nov 24

[edit]

Edited description of AOL open proxy blocking discussion for accuracy, and added entry for Wikipedia:Speedy deletion criterion for unsourced articles. John254 06:46, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

2006 Nov 28

[edit]

2006 Dec 3

[edit]

2006 December 3

[edit]

2006 Dec 10

[edit]