Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/Martha Bradley/archive1

Martha Bradley

Featured article candidates/Martha Bradley/archive1

Nominator(s): SchroCat (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Another cookery book writer from history for your consideration. I created this about four years ago and took it to GA, but I've recently added more and brushed it up, and I think it's mature enough to try for FA now. All constructive comments are most welcome. – SchroCat (talk) 16:48, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Generalissima

All images are public domain and good to use. Alt-text would be nice but not a requirement. Will do a prose review later. Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 17:10, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alt text: a perpetual weakness of mine: I shall add this shortly. Thanks for reviewing the images and I look forward to any other comments you have. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 17:14, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Alts now added - SchroCat (talk) 10:15, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support from Crisco

Did the PR. Put me down for another review here in the next few days. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 02:23, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- All of my concerns were addressed at PR. I made a quick edit to the ALT text, but other than that everything has been stable since 1 October. Happy to support. — Chris Woodrich (talk) 11:08, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

750h

like every other review feel free to refuse my suggestions with proper justification. 750 h+ 06:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

lead

released in two-volumes in 1758 does this mean there were two volumes released? if so why is there a hyphen?

Reworked it a little - SchroCat (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

life

no problems here. 750 h+ 06:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

the british housewife (1758)

showed an economical aspect to their ==> "showed an economic aspect to their"

"Economic" has overtones of economic science or the economy in general; "economical" is more to do with value for money or profitability and seems more appropriate. - SchroCat (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. 750 h+ 09:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

criticise their approach for certain dishes ==> "criticise their approach to certain dishes"

Yep, done. - SchroCat (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

and no way extravagant in the expense. ==> "and in no way extravagant in the expense."

This is a quote. - SchroCat (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

oh oops didn't realise 750 h+ 09:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the article @SchroCat:! I have an open candidacy if you'd like to take a look. 750 h+ 06:21, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks 750. Done, except where commented on. Cheers - SchroCat (talk) 09:38, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Support. 750 h+ 09:45, 8 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]