Wikipedia:Bots/Requests for approval/JJMC89 bot II

The following discussion is an archived debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA. The result of the discussion was

Approved.

JJMC89 bot II

Operator: JJMC89 (talk · contribs · SUL · edit count · logs · page moves · block log · rights log · ANI search)

Time filed: 03:21, Thursday, February 2, 2017 (UTC)

Automatic, Supervised, or Manual: Automatic

Programming language(s): Python

Source code available: editnotice-deployer.py on GitHub

Function overview: Deploy a template as an editnotice.

Links to relevant discussions (where appropriate): WP:BOTREQ#Apply editnotice to talk pages of pages in Category:Wikipedia information pages (permalink), MediaWiki talk:Common.js#Add editnotice (permalink), Template talk:Editnotices/Page/Wikipedia talk:Access to nonpublic information (permalink), WT:Project namespace#Edit notice for information talk pages (permalink)

Edit period(s): Daily

Estimated number of pages affected: 338

Exclusion compliant: Yes

Already has a bot flag: No

Function details: Deploy {{Wikipedia information pages talk page editnotice}} as an editnotice for talk pages of Wikipedia and Help pages in Category:Wikipedia information pages.

Discussion

Note: This task requires the bot to be granted templateeditor. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please make a userpage for this bot. — xaosflux ^Talk 05:21, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Done. — JJMC89 (T·C) 05:45, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Administrator note +C/+EC/+TE added. — xaosflux ^Talk 05:26, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved for trial (10 edits). Please provide a link to the relevant contributions and/or diffs when the trial is complete. — xaosflux ^Talk 12:16, 2 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Trial complete. 8 edits All of the pages now have the editnotice since I previously deployed it to most of them before a bot was requested. — JJMC89 (T·C) 03:42, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Approved. — xaosflux ^Talk 16:27, 3 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. To request review of this BRFA, please start a new section at WT:BRFA.