User talk:Zucat
Welcome!
|
Zucat, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi Zucat! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. |
Your recent edits
[edit]
Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. When you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion (but never when editing articles), please be sure to sign your posts. There are two ways to do this. Either:
- Add four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment; or
- With the cursor positioned at the end of your comment, click on the signature button (
or 
) located above the edit window.
This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is necessary to allow other editors to easily see who wrote what and when.
Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 23:35, 16 July 2014 (UTC)
July 2014
[edit] Hello, I'm Theroadislong. I noticed that you recently removed some content from Wikipedia:Teahouse/Questions without explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; I restored the removed content. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Theroadislong (talk) 21:32, 17 July 2014 (UTC)
Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Stuart little characters may have broken the syntax by modifying 22 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page(Click show ⇨)
|
|---|
|
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:21, 26 July 2014 (UTC)
Ways to improve LarryBoy (TV Series)
[edit]Hi, I'm Andrewright. Zucat, thanks for creating LarryBoy (TV Series)!
I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This page needs extreme updating. and does not meet the criteria for notability.
The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. S Blake 22:16, 25 August 2014 (UTC)
Bunny Maloney
[edit]Hi, thanks for creating the Bunny Maloney page. It made it easier for me to get started on filling it with info. Bunny Maloney finally has an English Wikipedia page that's also on par with it's French counterpart. So thanks a bunch! — Preceding unsigned comment added by Radix Z (talk • contribs) 23:32, 24 September 2014 (UTC)
Thank You, I Thought the same thing. (Zucat)
Hi Zucat: I saw your note at User talk:Drmies. You need to take a (second) look at this page - granted, there are only 4 people watching that article, and granted, you've clearly put a lot of effort into editing it, but you are not "the patroller" of the article. Everything on Wikipedia is subject to editing by others. Drmies' edit summaries indicate he found excessive detail and bad writing in the article - and it has tags for both, plus for not having any references. This is not a directory of all possible information: that's for fan sites. Find some solid references and you can add back details they mention. Beyond that, as another editor mentioned in her edit summary, talk about it on the article's talk page.
(Also, please note that on Wikipedia talk pages we start new sections at the bottom, not the top. It's easiest to click the "new section" tab above the talk page title.) Yngvadottir (talk) 06:20, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
- Ha, I see that Yngvadottir beat me to it. Zucat, I don't have much to add. Yes, you aren't the sole legitimate patroller of the article (nor am I), and while I appreciate your effort, this is an encyclopedia and we have certain standards for quality (spelling, grammar, sentence construction) in addition to a bunch of other guidelines--about wikilinking, about amount of detail, etc. Typical for such articles is to confuse character description with plot description, for instance. SummerPhD and I have looked at hundreds if not thousands of such articles, so I think you should have a little faith in our judgment. Thank you, Drmies (talk) 16:55, 3 December 2014 (UTC)
December 2014
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Talk:List of Stuart Little characters, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. SummerPhD (talk) 17:12, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Frustration
[edit]I assume this was a reference to my edits at List of Stuart Little characters. You will likely be told there that even as the article's original creator, you do not have special status in your editing. You cannot create or enforce any rules there. Instead, editing of all Wikipedia articles is subject to our general policies and guidelines. There are lots of them.
It really isn't possible to ever really learn all of them (and they change a bit over time anyway), so it's best to just start with the basics, summarized at WP:5.
I am trying to make the reasons for all of my edits clear on the article's talk page. If there is something you do not understand or disagree with, check there and ask questions. I'll try to clarify and, if we can't agree, I can also help bring in a neutral third opinion. Thanks and happy editing! - SummerPhD (talk) 18:04, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
References
[edit]You seem to be having difficulties citing sources please see Help:Referencing for beginners Theroadislong (talk) 20:49, 16 December 2014 (UTC)
Your experience with Wikipedia so far
[edit]Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.
To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://wiki.riteme.site/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op
To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85
Thanks!
Gabrielm199 (talk) 20:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)
Super Mario Bros. (film)
[edit]Has the webcomic received any major press coveraage, other than being mentioned on Slashfilm? Trivialist (talk) 22:59, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
- Wow, that's more coverage that I would have guessed. Seems worth trying to add a webcomic section to the article. Trivialist (talk) 00:08, 1 May 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:07, 24 November 2015 (UTC)
August 2016
[edit] Welcome to Wikipedia. We welcome and appreciate your contributions, but we cannot accept original research. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Snuggums (talk / edits) 20:13, 9 August 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Zucat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:List of films broadcast by Cartoon Network
[edit]
Hello, Zucat. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "List of films broadcast by Cartoon Network".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Nikkimaria (talk) 03:38, 18 February 2017 (UTC)
That's OK, I attempted to create that article back in 2014. I really liked the idea for it. But there isn't exactly any way I can justify it nowadays. I don't really care for it anymore, Go ahead and delete by all means. Zucat (talk) 21:57, 28 February 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit] Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be repeatedly reverting or undoing other editors' contributions at Back to the Future (franchise). Although this may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is known as "edit warring" and is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, as it often creates animosity between editors. Instead of reverting, please discuss the situation with the editor(s) involved and try to reach a consensus on the talk page.
If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing Wikipedia. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. Edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, and violating the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. DonIago (talk) 20:21, 15 May 2017 (UTC)
Is blocking my access to Wikipedia REALLY nessacary to protect a vision of an article. That's a little extreme, don't you think? Can't there be another compromise? I don't believe you can get blocked for multiple reversions. I'm not trying to tell you what to do, but all I'm saying is that maybe you should try to have a little more faith in people's edits before you make drastic statements. Zucat (talk) 19:40, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- Nobody's blocked your access at this time, and nobody will block your access if you are willing to discuss edits rather than simply continuing to re-apply them despite other editors disagreeing with them. I recommend reviewing WP:BRD, which while it isn't policy is often considered "best practice". Cheers. DonIago (talk) 19:45, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
OK! And just so you know, those edits I was reverting were not mine. I just thought the page was fine the way it was. I'll try to keep what you said in mind next time I edit. Thanks. Zucat (talk) 19:53, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
- You're welcome; glad I could help! If you still feel strongly about the issue with the article, I'd encourage you to bring it up at the article's Talk page, so that other editors can offer their thoughts on it. Happy editing! DonIago (talk) 20:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)
3RR warning
[edit]This is the required warning that you are about to break WP:3RR at Die Hard (film series). Note that while a 24-limit marks bright-line violations, admins may impose sanctions for a pattern of edit-warring. Per WP:BRD, when first reverted, protocol is to discuss the issue on the article's talk page rather than edit-war. If 3RR is broken, admins will be notified. It's important for the sake of this encyclopedia that we reach talk-page consensus and not edit-war. --Tenebrae (talk) 21:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Euphemisms
[edit]Please do not add euphemisms to articles, as you did in this edit. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:54, 29 August 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Zucat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
Reese Witherspoon
[edit]Hi, about the video game detail you deleted, just curious if there was a reason why you didn’t just create a video game section for it? I wouldn’t want to spin wheels re-adding (even though I’m not the original poster) if it’s likely to be removed again. Thanks! MissTofATX (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)MissTofATX MissTofATX (talk) 19:58, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Oh, no worries, I can definitely add a video game section, although it won't be that big as the Monster's vs. Aliens video game is currently her only video game role. Zucat (talk) 20:15, 26 April 2018 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for June 8
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited The Lion King (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Williams (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:36, 8 June 2018 (UTC)
Scooby Doo
[edit]Just letting you know that I didn't re-name the article for "no reason" like I claimed. I clearly stated a reason, which was a good one. We can't have an article which tries to focus on both every single live action Scooby Doo film, (both theatrical, direct-to-video and Tv-movies) and also add info about an animated film for no good reason. If we do that there is no actual topic to the article, it's just a random mess. The new theatrical animated film isn't a "reboot" of any kind, it's just another Scooby-Doo film which has *one* thing in common with only the two first live action Scooby Doo films, that it's going to be released in theaters. I've started a discussion on the talkpage, shime in if you feel like it.★Trekker (talk) 05:24, 8 July 2018 (UTC)
First off, one quick thing: The upcoming animated Scooby-Doo film isn't cancelled as of now. It still has a release date of 2020. Also, If you feel like the article has to only include the feature-legnth live action films, that's fine. But personally, I propose we move the article to Scooby-Doo in film so that way the upcoming animated film can have some representation as well along with a mini-section (or main article link) explaining the direct to video films. Zucat (talk) 23:37, 17 July 2018 (UTC)
- Hi, I'm just comming by to say that I'm very sorry about how this conversation turned out eventually. I was very rude and that's not ok.★Trekker (talk) 05:05, 11 November 2018 (UTC)
You don't have to be sorry, you just need to have more faith in people's visions of Articles. Rudley disagreeing with others like how you did back there doesn't help anything on this site JSYK. Nonetheless, I'll definitely accept your apology since I'm a compassionate person, no hard feelings. And now to get back to the topic, I still think the 2020 Scooby-Doo should be included on the article once it's renamed to Scooby-Doo in film. I've actually opposed the idea of having the direct to video films be listed and the article would benefit both parties if it included only the major films in the series (including the theatrical and live-action television films. Zucat (talk) 22:50, 17 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Zucat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Zucat,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:38, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Zucat,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:39, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Zucat,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 20:40, 3 October 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for November 28
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited National Lampoon's Vacation (film series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hannah Davis (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:37, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
National Lampoon’s Vacation (film series)
[edit]Hello. I strongly apologise to bother you, but if you don’t mind, I’d like to ask for your opinnion since you specialize in Cast and character tables. It seems there is a typo in the (added by you) “Girl in the Red Farrari”, and do you think it’d be better to change “Original series” to “Main series” or “Main films” in the “Principal cast” and “Additional crew” tables’ headings (because of 2015’s Vacation)? Thank you very much for help in advance. Greetings and kind regards, -- Pinoczet (talk) 18:55, 28 November 2019 (UTC)
Hello, sorry for the late response. I would personally lean towards to main films because 2015's Vacation is more a spiritual sequel than anything. Thank you bringing this up to me! And you weren't bothering me at all. lol Zucat (talk) 19:47, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
Hi again. Could you add to the article’s “Other appearances” sub-section a paragraph about this, please? I don’t speak English very fluently, so I wouldn’t want to make any mistake nor describe it in poor wording. Also, it seems the info about “Blue Harvest” and “Boys Do Cry” Family Guy’s episodes needs some references, what do you think? Thank you very much for help in advance. Greetings and kind regards, -- Pinoczet (talk) 07:00, 8 January 2020 (UTC) Update: e.g. I found this, the citation: This isn’t the first time that Chase and D’Angelo have stepped into their Griswold roles in recent memory. They made a brief cameo in “Family Guy: Blue Harvest,” the animated series’ loving parody of “Star Wars Episode IV: A New Hope,” complete in a flying version of the first “Vacation” movie’s Wagon Queen Family Truckster (the big green station wagon thing), and this, the citation: The DVD Version also contains a quite funny scene of the trip to Texas, a reference to a similar scene (with a more harmless ending) from National Lampoon’s Vacation. A blond chick in a sports car arrives from the back and starts hitting on Peter while she’s driving next to him. Peter responds positively but suddenly a semi approaches and rams her off the road. The car blows up in the background. Peter gets scared: “Holy crap!” Lois says: “You marry Billy Joel. It’s going to happen one way or another.” (Musican Billy Joel is one of Christie Brinkley’s exes and it was her who played the chick in the Ferrari.) -- Pinoczet (talk) 07:20, 8 January 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for December 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Emmet Brickowski, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gotham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 08:19, 20 December 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 10
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Batman in film, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bane (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 16:22, 10 March 2020 (UTC)
"Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in fim" listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in fim. Since you had some involvement with the Teenage Mutant Ninja Turtles in fim redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Regards, SONIC678 19:39, 27 April 2020 (UTC)
My question about your edits
[edit]I've seen your edits on An American Tail: The Treasure of Manhattan Island and you removed details involving "characters not returning in The Mystery of the Night Monster" as well as removing details involving how the film was subjected. Is there something you don't want anyone to know? I mean some medias like Peter Pan (1953 film) had Native Americans and controversy involving the song What Makes the Red Man Red?, causing the Natives not to appear in Return to Neverland. Some contents involving racism and police brutality are usually condemned from further medias due to United States awareness today. Retrosunshine2006 (talk) 17:23, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
I removed that info as I figured they were unesacarry as they felt more like trivia than actual facts. Stuff like is what normal audiences could put together.
If you feel like this was a mistake, you're more than welcome to add the info back. Although, I will reccomend you add the information to a new section on the article like "Political themes or Racial content", not in the notes or references. Thank you and happy editing. Zucat (talk) 17:37, 29 May 2020 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for July 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trolls (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page David Flynn (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:23, 18 July 2020 (UTC)
J. K. Simmons in Zack Snyder's Justice League
[edit]Hello,
I would like to give my two cents on the idea behind whether the sources state J. K. Simmons in Zack Snyder's Justice League. All of these citations read as Snyder will at least carry over the couple of scenes shot and released in the 2017 theatrical cut. I know this because in the sources online Simmons was asked by Snyder if his scenes shot can be used in the Director's cut. The big question that is mistakenly represented is if he will return for reshoots or potentially add more scenes. I can provide the direct quote if you wish. Cardei012597 (talk) 08:07, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
I found this interesting statement from several major news sources, including [1]: "Snyder and Warner Bros. first needed to get permission from the entire cast before working". Snyder and Warner Bros. needed permission to use any footage shot of all actors, for the director's cut. And, yes, this includes Simmons who was "contacted by Snyder" for this specific permission to use any footage shot of him as Gordon. All this is stated in the MovieWeb article. Cardei012597 (talk) 08:16, 23 September 2020 (UTC)
Arthur
[edit]Hi Zucat. Just wanting to know I reverted your edits on the Arthur wiki page because there are indeed 2 upcoming seasons and 2 upcoming specials. After that the show is ending. More information: https://twitter.com/ItsPeeebs/status/1300938560095297537 VGPCVGCP (talk) 00:15, 21 October 2020 (UTC)
November 2020
[edit]
Please do not add or change content, as you did at Brokeback Mountain, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. I'm also uncertain how it's significant that Brokeback Mountain is the most recent film to be inducted into the registry. That comment seems unrelated to the film itself, and it isn't as though the registry will never induct another film. DonIago (talk) 14:00, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
Disambiguation link notification for January 4
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Sauron, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Clash of the Titans.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:20, 4 January 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Batman films cast members, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Peter Guinness.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 18 April 2021 (UTC)
Cocomelon
[edit]While it is quite possible that Cocomelon is now in 2nd place, I believe we need to wait for a third-party source with access to exact numbers in order to confirm this. If there are no exact numbers, then we should wait until Cocomelon hits 110 million (unless PewDiePie pulls ahead after all) before announcing that they have switched places. —Soap— 10:41, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
- Apologies if you were seeing 110 million this morning when I was not ... perhaps the UI is such that even subscriber counts don't roll out to every browser at the same time. I still want to wait until SocialBlade updates it to 110M, which should be a matter of mere hours now, unless someone else makes the change. —Soap— 20:00, 25 April 2021 (UTC)
July 2021
[edit] Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to The SpongeBob Movie: Sponge on the Run. Your edits could be interpreted as vandalism and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Continuing to change the characters' name to what you wish to put is not helpful, especially when the credits themselves list her character as 'Master of Ceremonies'. Also to note, as WP:FILMCAST states, "All names should be referred to as credited, or by common name supported by a reliable source."- the character is listed as 'Master of Ceremonies', as shown in the image I've linked... Magitroopa (talk) 19:49, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.
Points to note:
- Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
- Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.
If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Magitroopa (talk) 19:52, 3 July 2021 (UTC)
OK, first of all, do not put words in my mouth by saying I was putting Incorrect Information. I am a verified user of this site and never once have I ever attempted to spread "Incorrect Information". I understand you're worried about the article, but there's no need for that.
Furthermore, I did cite the source on SotR's article history. If you don't have the energy to check the the source I provided, you can watch the movie again at the 47:23 mark. Yes, the Master of Ceremonies is her billed name, but verified sources as well as the film itself say otherwise. I firmly believe this information should be implemented, so what are we gonna do about this? Because we can't be in a stand-still about this. Zucat (talk) 02:27, 4 July 2021 (UTC)
Boogie2988's hometown?
[edit]I asked on the talk page 3 months ago but haven't gotten an answer as to what state Boogie lives in? (Virginia or Arkansas?) You are the most active editor on Boogie2988's article page and I was curious if you knew the answer? LaceyUF (talk) 00:23, 7 July 2021 (UTC)
Apologies for the late response. Arkansas is his hometown, but Virginia is the place he was residing at the time when Frank Hassle came to his Door. Zucat (talk) 20:42, 11 August 2021 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 20
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Trolls (franchise), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anthony Ramos.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:57, 20 October 2021 (UTC)
Hello. I apologise to bother you, but if you do not mind, I would like to ask a question regarding the article National Lampoon's Vacation (film series). Recently, I have found out about another project, namely a series of commercials for AAMI featuring Chevy Chase (the source). They have been archived and can be watched online: ad 1, ad 2, ad 3. To my knowledge, these TV commercials originally aired in 1998 (the source, see at 1:00:40 as well as 1:24:18). Is it worth mentioning in the article and should it be included in the release timeline? PS. I believe it would be reasonable to clarify there have been four TV spots for Old Navy featuring the Griswold family (the source, a rumoured fifth one never aired). Thank you very much in advance. Kind regards, --89.66.254.10 (talk) 15:45, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
Just a heads up, I'm not exactly the keeper of the National Lampoon series article nor am I the most frequent editor on it, so you don't have to consult me about changes to it. But in regards to the content you mentioned, it can be listed in the article under an "Other media" sort of thing, but I would personally keep it away from the character table as they don't seem to be long or notable enough to warrant inclusion. Zucat (talk) 00:43, 3 November 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit] | Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add |
ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:28, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
Remember to add references
[edit]Please remember to add citations to the information you add, as you failed to do in these edits: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5]. All material on Wikipedia must be attributable to reliable, published sources. ArcticSeeress (talk) 23:12, 12 December 2022 (UTC)
If you had bothered to check these Wikitables again, you would notice a majority of these tables that include all these roles and appearances do not have sources on them. I didn't feel the need to add a source for these edits because there was no attempt to enforce them on the respective articles. If all these filmographies were backed up with sources, I would have added one myself, but they weren't. If you're against my edits, go to these articles talk pages and lay down a source-required rule, because bringing this topic to an ordinary user like myself doesn't help. Zucat (talk) 02:50, 14 December 2022 (UTC)
If you're against my edits, [don't bring them up to me]
- What? Who else would I talk to? You're the ones who made your edits.- In any case, of course I can tell that they don't have sources, I found your edits through the ones you made at Markiplier, where I had already added a cleanup tag. The edits I pointed out here were simply your most recent ones. Just because the other entries in the tables don't have citations doesn't mean you can add whatever you want unsourced. What you personally feel doesn't supersede longstanding Wikipedia policy. Per WP:BURDEN: "The burden to demonstrate verifiability lies with the editor who adds or restores material". ArcticSeeress (talk) 09:25, 19 December 2022 (UTC)
Understood, my apolgies.Zucat (talk) 19:58, 22 December 2022 (UTC)
- Please stop adding unsourced content to articles - there already being unsourced content isn't a reason to add more - you've previously been notified of WP:BURDEN. Waxworker (talk) 11:34, 17 September 2023 (UTC)
- I understand your frustration, but I must ask if you even took the time to look up the episode / listing I added. I am very much aware that content in general needs to be sourced, but you seem to be coming at me as if my edit was in bad faith, which the intention was not. You are more than free to revert my edits, but it is not my burden that Lamarr's article hasn't been taken good care of. Zucat (talk) 06:07, 19 September 2023 (UTC)
SpongeBob edits
[edit]Please note that NickALive! is not a reliable source as it is a fan-run blog. Vincent Waller's Twitter account/tweets is also unreliable as the account in question is not verified. If you intend to change/readd this information across the articles, please use a reliable source. Thank you. Magitroopa (talk) 19:02, 16 December 2022 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 31
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Possum.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 31 January 2023 (UTC)
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:45, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
Adventures of Sonic the Hedgehog
[edit]Greetings. Can you name specific episodes for this? I know the show inside and out, but can't remember that being a running theme with Grounder. Mac Dreamstate (talk) 23:14, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
- Yes, examples of Grounder expressing having a mother in his life include Sonic's Song ("Can I say Hi to my mommy?"), Momma Robotnik Returns ("I wish I had a mommy") and Robo Ninjas ("Ooooow, Mama"). Zucat (talk) 23:21, 30 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 11
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of iCarly characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chicken wing.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:08, 11 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of Johnny Test characters, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Batman & Robin.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 17:58, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 13
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Cloudy with a Chance of Meatballs (TV series), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kim Roberts.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 13 May 2024 (UTC)
|
The Good J b! Award
| |
| As we shouldn't be. Keep up the good work! Down with the cruft! Panini! • 🥪 23:08, 17 June 2024 (UTC) |
September 2024
[edit] Please do not add or change content, as you did at Jeff Bennett, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Uncredited roles must be sourced. DonIago (talk) 17:54, 18 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Piece by Piece (2024 film), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Triton.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 18 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:31, 19 November 2024 (UTC)