User talk:Zakary2012

Welcome!

Hello, Zakary2012, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Melbourne did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome!  I dream of horses ^{(Contribs) (Talk)} 20:51, 18 November 2023 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Nathan Conroy (Australian mayor and election candidate)

Hello, Zakary2012

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I’ve proposed an article that you started, Nathan Conroy (Australian mayor and election candidate), for deletion because it's a biography of a living person that lacks references. To prevent the deletion, please add a reference to the article. You may remove the deletion tag yourself once the article has at least one reliable source.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales ^Parley 12:46, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Zakary2012! Your additions to Nathan Conroy (Australian politician) have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Wikishovel (talk) 21:37, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

CS1 error on Nathan Conroy (Australian politician)

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Nathan Conroy (Australian politician), may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

• A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 22:02, 28 January 2024 (UTC)

Carrum Downs Regional Shopping Centre moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Carrum Downs Regional Shopping Centre. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. JTtheOG (talk) 05:15, 2 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello, Zakary2012. I noticed that your recent edit to List of road routes in Victoria added a link to an image on an external website or on your computer, or to a file name that does not exist on Wikipedia's server. For technical and policy reasons it is not possible to use images from external sources on Wikipedia. Most images you find on the internet are copyrighted and cannot be used on Wikipedia, or their use is subject to certain restrictions. If the image meets Wikipedia's image use policy, consider uploading it to Wikipedia yourself or request that someone else upload it. See the image tutorial to learn about wiki syntax used for images. Thank you. - Sumanuil. _{(talk to me)} 05:34, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 23

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Keysborough, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Church. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 06:04, 23 March 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for March 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Frankston North, Victoria, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Frankston.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:05, 30 March 2024 (UTC)

Mount Stirling Alpine Resort moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Mount Stirling Alpine Resort. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 04:38, 19 May 2024 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of THE MAGIC PRANK SHOW with Justin Willman

Hello, Zakary2012

Welcome to Wikipedia! I edit here too, under the username Joseywales1961, and I thank you for your contributions.

I wanted to let you know, however, that I've proposed an article that you started, THE MAGIC PRANK SHOW with Justin Willman, for deletion because it meets one or more of our deletion criteria, and I don't think that it is suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia. The particular issue can be found in the notice that is now visible at the top of the article.

If you wish to contest the deletion:

1. Edit the page
2. Remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
3. Click the Publish changes button.

If you object to the article's deletion, please remember to explain why you think the article should be kept on the article's talk page and improve the page to address the issues raised in the deletion notice. Otherwise, it may be deleted later by other means.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Joseywales1961}}. And remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Josey Wales ^Parley 10:24, 27 May 2024 (UTC)

The Magic Prank Show with Justin Willman moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to The Magic Prank Show with Justin Willman. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Ratnahastin (talk) 07:40, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Royal Anthem on Australia Page

Hello there

Please do not try to force through your preferred option on the info box. Please see policy on the bold, revert, discuss cycle and edit warring. WP:EDITWARRING You need to gain a consensus for your changes through discussion and there appears to be no consensus for your changes. Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 07:58, 4 June 2024 (UTC)

June 2024

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Daniel Andrews. GraziePrego (talk) 07:20, 14 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Stirling Alpine Resort (June 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mount Stirling Alpine Resort and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Hello, Zakary2012! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:03, 25 June 2024 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mount Stirling Alpine Resort (June 26)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mount Stirling Alpine Resort and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:31, 26 June 2024 (UTC)

Edit warring at K'gari

Hi Zakary2012! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of K'gari several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at Talk:K'gari, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Turnagra (talk) 04:29, 28 June 2024 (UTC)

Welcome to the DCWC!

See a    "developing" or    "least developed" country? Write about it to earn points!

Welcome to the 2024 Developing Countries WikiContest, Zakary2012! The contest is now open for submissions. List your work at your submissions page to earn points. If you haven't done so already, please review the following:

• Got open nominations? List them at review requests.
• Looking for a topic to work on? Check out suggested articles and eligible reviews.
• Not sure if your article qualifies? See the guidelines for more information or contact a coordinator for verification.
• New to Wikipedia? Many experienced editors are part of this contest and willing to help; feel free to ask questions about the contest on the talk page.
• Know someone else who might be interested? Sign-ups remain open until 15 July, so don't hesitate to invite other editors!

On behalf of the coordinators, we hope you enjoy participating and wish you good luck! If you have any questions, please leave a message on the contest talk page or ask one of the coordinators: Ixtal (talk · contribs), sawyer777 (talk · contribs), or TechnoSquirrel69 (talk · contribs). (To unsubscribe from these updates, remove yourself from this list.) Sent via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) —TechnoSquirrel69 (sigh) 00:01, 1 July 2024 (UTC)

Australia infobox

Hello there

Please don't try to force through your preferred version of the infobox while the issue is still under discussion. Please carefully read policy on the Bold Revert Discuss cycle Wikipedia:BOLD, revert, discuss cycle and consensus Wikipedia:Consensus

Thank you Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 07:51, 4 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit summaries needed

Hi Most wikipedia editors add an "Edit Summary" when making an edit. You will see the space provided to do this as you make an edit. It's regarded as good practice and an important courtesy to other editors. Thank you. Happy Editing. Nickm57 (talk) 06:34, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Edit to Australia

Hi, I've reverted your edit to Australia because it was incorrect. Australia is not in "Stages of independence" as you put it, it's an independent country. GraziePrego (talk) 10:26, 6 July 2024 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited United Kingdom, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages British, Brit and Pom.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 18:17, 9 July 2024 (UTC)

Another Welcome and some useful links

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia!

I know you have already been welcomed, but after looking at some of your edits again, thought you might find this list of links for newcomers useful.

Here are a few good links:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Tips on starting your first article
• Help pages • Tips
• Introduction to Wikipedia

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, visit the Teahouse, our help forum for new users, or type {{helpme}} here on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Nickm57 (talk) 09:25, 11 July 2024 (UTC)

Australian Labor Party

Hi, I reverted your edit to Australian Party in which you changed the political position description in the infobox as this has been discussed at length and there is no consensus for change. Please refer to Talk:Australian_Labor_Party#Seeking_a_broad_consensus_to_re-situate_the_ALP's_ideology_in_accordance_to_reliable_sources. for the most recent discussion. TarnishedPath^talk 11:44, 12 July 2024 (UTC)

Introduction to contentious topics

You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.

ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:23, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

You should familiarize yourself with the talk pages of ARBPIA articles before leaping in to edit contentious material. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 00:41, 13 July 2024 (UTC)

@ScottishFinnishRadish, just wanted to give you a heads up they've created a "this user is transphobic" userbox which I think qualifies for an indef per WP:HID and WP:NQP. Your Friendly Neighborhood Sociologist ⚧ Ⓐ (talk) 05:40, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Another welcome for you

Hello, Zakary2012 and a belated welcome to Wikipedia! I see that you've already been around awhile and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may benefit from following some of the links below, which help one get the most out of Wikipedia. If you have any questions, you can ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or by typing four tildes "~~~~"; this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you are interested in learning more about contributing, you might want to consider being "adopted" by a more experienced editor or joining a WikiProject to collaborate with others in creating and improving articles of your interest. Click here for a directory of all the WikiProjects. Finally, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Happy editing! Pachu Kannan (talk) 06:48, 13 July 2024 (UTC) Getting Started Wikipedia Tutorial • The five pillars of Wikipedia How to: edit a page • upload an image •The missing manual Getting Help Frequently Asked Questions Where to ask questions or make comments Request administrator attention Policies and Guidelines Neutral point of view • Reliable sources Verifiability • Citing sources • No original research What Wikipedia is not • Biographies of living persons Manual of Style • Three-revert rule • Sock puppetry Copyrights • Fair use • Image use policy External links • Spam • Vandalism Deletion policy • Conflict of interest • Notability The Community Build consensus • Resolving disputes Assume good faith • Civility • Etiquette No personal attacks • No legal threats Community Portal • Village pump Signpost, our newspaper • IRC channels • Mailing lists Things to do Be bold in editing • Help develop an article Peer review Join a WikiProject • Translating articles Cleaning up: General • Spam • Vandalism Miscellaneous Categories • Disambiguity • Stubs User pages • Talk pages Useful templates • Tools • User scripts

July 2024

Hello, Zakary2012, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 06:02, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Are you able to tell me the accounts you think I have been working with as I feel there may be a bit of a misunderstanding. You see I made a page for my Userbox, User:Transphobic but I think it may have been set up as user page instead of a Userbox page. Zakary2012 (talk) 06:17, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Out of curiosity, what did that userbox say? GraziePrego (talk) 06:19, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

"This user is transphobic" Zakary2012 (talk) 06:24, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Is that not allowed? Zakary2012 (talk) 06:29, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Not allowed. WP:No queerphobes. Ahri Boy (talk) 08:36, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, I didn't realise that it was against the rules at the time. I let my opinion get ahead of me. Plus at the time I thought "transphobic" meant you were against gender transition, not you hate trans people. Now that I know what transphobic means, I greatly regret my decision to make this Userbox and apologise to anyone who was offended by my actions. Zakary2012 (talk) 09:07, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Given that gender transition is pretty integral to the existence of most trans people, how can you think that being just against gender transition is nothing to do with hating trans people? GraziePrego (talk) 10:23, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

ANI

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you.GraziePrego (talk) 06:40, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

What is it? Zakary2012 (talk) 06:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Follow the link and scroll to the bottom of the page. GraziePrego (talk) 06:48, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

You have recently made edits related to gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them. This is a standard message to inform you that gender-related disputes or controversies or people associated with them is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Doug Weller talk 07:40, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

July 2024

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently making disruptive edits.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Isabelle Belato ^🏳‍🌈 13:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Appealing my Block

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakary2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

At the time that I caused disruptive editing I did not know that it was against Wikipedia rules. Now I know that it is against Wikipedia rules I am ashamed of myself and regret ever causing disruptive editing. If I am unblocked I will never cause disruptive editing and will only ever upload helpful information to Wikipedia. If you look at some of contributions you will find that the majority of them are helpful. If I am unblocked I will continue adding useful information to Wikipedia like I have done previously but I will NEVER be disruptive Zakary2012 (talk) 21:28, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Decline reason:

What nonsense. You knew you were being disruptive. You didn't need to know there was a rule against it to know this was harmful. Yamla (talk) 21:42, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Zakary2012 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I do acknowledge that when vandalising Daniel Andrews I knew what I was doing the wrong thing and I greatly regret ever vandalising the page. On the Australia page however when I committed edit warring I did not know that it was a thing let alone that it wasn't allowed, it wasn't until an experienced editor told me about it when I realised it wasn't allowed. Lastly, with my transphobic Userbox, at the time I thought that transphobia was being against gender transition not hating trans people. Now I know about these rules and definitions are really regret ever committing disruptive editing and feel I have learnt my lesson.

Decline reason:

I concur that there is little to no chance that you will be unblocked before a six month wait. We need to see a demonstration that you can abide by community policies and practices. 331dot (talk) 16:24, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Zakary2012 (talk) 22:16, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

It would be better to stay off and come back after six months per WP:SO. Ahri Boy (talk) 22:44, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

Don’t spam the review process for your unblock. An admin reviewed and declined your request only 30 minutes ago and you immediately make another request to be unblocked? You’re not showing any sign of understanding why you’ve been blocked. GraziePrego (talk) 22:45, 16 July 2024 (UTC)

I agree with this. My advice to you is to wait for six months per WP:SO, as Ahri Boy said. If you're getting frustrated, I also suggest taking a walk outside for some fresh air, or simply just do some breathing exercises, like I do when I'm stressed. Just think about how you're going to make Wikipedia a better place when you do get unblocked. Right now I don't think the chances of an admin unblocking you are high at all. NoobThreePointOh (talk) 04:14, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Does it have to be six months? Can't it be like a week? Because I really do regret what I did and I love Wikipedia. Zakary2012 (talk) 05:10, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

Every single action you have taken since being blocked shows that you have zero respect for the rules or the processes by which Wikipedia operates. You have just spammed out statements which barely disguise that you're just desperate to get back to editing in the exact same way as before. No one who "loves" Wikipedia would vandalise it. Do as others have suggested and just wait. Immediately spamming the unblock process shows that you have zero understanding of why you're blocked and you just want someone to undo the block because it annoys you. GraziePrego (talk) 06:07, 17 July 2024 (UTC)

@Zakary2012: Since I haven't seen anyone else say it, I just want to point out that being "against gender transition" is not somehow less hateful or less transphobic than simply "hating trans people", since it's the viewpoint that transgender people should not exist at all. Just something to think about. 🌸wasianpower🌸 (talk • contribs) 16:48, 17 July 2024 (UTC)