Jump to content

User talk:Zaara writes

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

[edit]

Hi Zaara writes! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! Madeline (part of me) 09:41, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riaz K Ahmed (October 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Timtrent were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Zaara writes! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:48, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riaz K Ahmed (October 10)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Theroadislong were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 14:54, 10 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riaz K Ahmed (October 11)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 13:00, 11 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Riaz K Ahmed has a new comment

[edit]
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Riaz K Ahmed. Thanks! 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 08:47, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Riaz K Ahmed, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:01, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Riaz K Ahmed (October 12)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 09:14, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

I have pasted this comment here because, assuming the draft you have been paid to wrote is deleted, you will not see it. You need to see it and to understand it.

As a paid editor you are expected to learn and understand what is required for an article to be accepted on Wikipedia without a great deal of help. Paid editors ought to be able to create a draft that is accepted first time, or after only one decline.
Please find out what is wring with this for yourself, whcih is what you are being paid to do, and put it right. Just declaring that you are paid is not sufficient. You are being paid to learn how to do this, so please do it correctly.
If I were to review this right now I would decline it. If you were an amateur editor I would explain why, but I am a volunteer and I see no reason to assist you to get a paycheque. Please do what you are being paid to do and only submit things which are truly ready.

Paid editors are a valid part of Wikipedia, but not if they become a distraction when they appear to require overmuch help. 🇺🇦 FiddleTimtrent FaddleTalk to me 🇺🇦 09:42, 12 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

October 2022

[edit]

Reply

[edit]

Thank you for declaring your conflict of interest. That doesn't mean you can write what you like, you must follow the guidance below:

  • When you write about a person, you must provide independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that they meet the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the person or an associated organization, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the person claims or interviewing them. Note that references should be in-line so we can tell what fact each is supporting, and should not be bare urls.
  • Most of your text is unsourced, and the refs you do give are often quoting him or interviewing him, and are not indpendent third party sources
  • It's not all all clear that he meets the notabilty criteria linked above.
  • You must write in a non-promotional tone. Articles must be neutral and encyclopaedic, with verifiable facts, not opinions or reviews.
  • You text is full of promotional claims, like Ahmed has more than 50 super hit films to his credit. , no source of cause, and just promotion. We also get gossip column stuff like Mr. Ahmed was an ardent Rajini fan right from the beginning[2]. He never missed watching all of Rajinikanth's films on the so-called "First Day, First Show". How does this make him notable? How do you verify this? Him saying so doesn't make it true.
  • There shouldn't be any url links in the article, only in the "References" or "External links" sections.
  • You must not copy text from elsewhere. Copyrighted text is not allowed in Wikipedia, as outlined in this policy. That applies even to pages created by you or your organization, unless they state clearly and explicitly that the text is public domain. We require that text posted here can be used, modified and distributed for any purpose, including commercial; text is considered to be copyright unless explicitly stated otherwise. There are ways to donate copyrighted text to Wikipedia, as described here; please note that simply asserting on the talk page that you are the owner of the copyright, or you have permission to use the text, isn't sufficient.

Please use our format for headings and infoboxes, don't make up your own. @Bbb23: for info.

Before attempting to write an article again, please make sure that the topic meets the notability criteria linked above, and check that you can find independent third party sources.

Ah, I see you are a sock now Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:27, 13 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]