Jump to content

User talk:ZLEA/Archive 8

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Archive 5Archive 6Archive 7Archive 8Archive 9Archive 10Archive 15

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
5 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C SSETI Express Satellite (talk) Add sources
295 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: B Spectrum (arena) (talk) Add sources
14 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Fifty-satang coin (talk) Add sources
319 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Coins of the Canadian dollar (talk) Add sources
547 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C United States Mint (talk) Add sources
196 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Jamaican dollar (talk) Add sources
598 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Reichsmark (talk) Cleanup
75 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: B Philippine fifty peso note (talk) Cleanup
68 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Philippine one hundred peso note (talk) Cleanup
142 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Radiation-absorbent material (talk) Expand
68 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Coins of the New Zealand dollar (talk) Expand
236 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Future Combat Air System (talk) Expand
87 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Coining (mint) (talk) Unencyclopaedic
36 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Pattern coin (talk) Unencyclopaedic
33 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C United States Mint coin sets (talk) Unencyclopaedic
58 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Kuruş (talk) Merge
49 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Coins.ph (talk) Merge
62 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Affordability of housing in the United Kingdom (talk) Merge
244 Quality: High, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: GA Windows 2.0 (talk) Wikify
63 Quality: High, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: FA Fractional currency (talk) Wikify
1,442 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Adobe Illustrator (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Philippine BSP Series currency notes (talk) Orphan
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub LoFLYTE (talk) Orphan
39 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C US Error Coins (talk) Orphan
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start BRICSat-P (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub UoSAT-4 (talk) Stub
125 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Es'hail 2 (talk) Stub
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub UoSAT-5 (talk) Stub
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start ParkinsonSAT (talk) Stub
5 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start UoSAT-3 (talk) Stub

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. We appreciate that you have signed up to receive suggestions regularly; your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping!

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please let us know on SuggestBot's talk page. -- SuggestBot (talk) 11:24, 2 March 2019 (UTC)

16:38, 4 March 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – March 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (February 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • A new tool is available to help determine if a given IP is an open proxy/VPN/webhost/compromised host.

Arbitration

  • The Arbitration Committee announced two new OTRS queues. Both are meant solely for cases involving private information; other cases will continue to be handled at the appropriate venues (e.g., WP:COIN or WP:SPI).
    • paid-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private evidence related to abusive paid editing.
    • checkuser-en-wp@wikipedia.org has been set up to receive private requests for CheckUser. For instance, requests for IP block exemption for anonymous proxy editing should now be sent to this address instead of the functionaries-en list.

Miscellaneous


The Bugle: Issue CLV, March 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:00, 10 March 2019 (UTC)

Please participate to the talk pages consultation

Hello

Our team at the Wikimedia Foundation is working on a project to improve the ease-of-use and productivity of wiki talk pages. As a Teahouse host, I can imagine you’ve run into challenges explaining talk pages to first-time participants.

We want all contributors to be able to talk to each other on the wikis – to ask questions, to resolve differences, to organize projects and to make decisions. Communication is essential for the depth and quality of our content, and the health of our communities. We're currently leading a global consultation on how to improve talk pages, and we're looking for people that can report on their experiences using (or helping other people to use) wiki talk pages. We'd like to invite you to participate in the consultation, and invite new users to join too.

We thank you in advance for your participation and your help.

Trizek (WMF), 08:37, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

The previous message about the talk pages consultation has a broken link.

The correct link has been misinterpreted by the MassMessage tool. Please use the following link: Wikipedia:Talk pages consultation 2019.

Sorry for the inconvenience, Trizek (WMF), 08:48, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

19:29, 11 March 2019 (UTC)

19:44, 18 March 2019 (UTC)

A Barnstar for you!

The Teamwork Barnstar
For assisting an editor, who couldn't contribute directly due to a COI, on the Northrop Grumman page. Cheers - wolf 01:50, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Pending changes reviewer granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "pending changes reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on pages protected by pending changes. The list of articles awaiting review is located at Special:PendingChanges, while the list of articles that have pending changes protection turned on is located at Special:StablePages.

Being granted reviewer rights neither grants you status nor changes how you can edit articles. If you do not want this user right, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time.

See also:

TonyBallioni (talk) 15:13, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Half dime

I suggest the half dime should not be lumped in with the Nickel, in the same way that the three-cent nickel and the three-cent silver are not lumped together, and neither are the regular dollar coin and the gold dollar. In fact, the half dime is usually listed as an odd denomination/obsolete coin. --Enterlousy (talk) 20:45, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Ok, thanks. - ZLEA Talk\Contribs 20:51, 20 March 2019 (UTC)

Obsolete denominations

I personally would keep the two-cent billon, three-cent bronze, stella, and half union in for the same logic that the 100,000 dollar bill is listed. Both those pattern coins and the $100,000 bill were never actually released for circulation, the only difference is that the $100,000 bill is currently illegal to own. --Enterlousy (talk) 04:39, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Enterlousy A better idea would be to include them in a Cancelled denominations of the US dollar page. - ZLEA Talk\Contribs 13:36, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
Good idea. --Enterlousy (talk) 15:59, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I've started the page in my sandbox at User:ZLEA/sandbox/Cancelled denominations of United States currency. - ZLEA Talk\Contribs 16:03, 22 March 2019 (UTC)
I see that you already started the page, nevermind. - ZLEA Talk\Contribs 16:06, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

Half union

Should the Panama Pacific Exposition version of the half union be added into the table in Obsolete denominations of United States currency? --Enterlousy (talk) 16:12, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

No, that coin was not meant for circulation, and even today, US commemorative coins are minted in otherwise obsolete denominations of $5 and $10. - ZLEA Talk\Contribs 16:43, 22 March 2019 (UTC)

18:05, 25 March 2019 (UTC)

A cheeseburger for you!

Appreciate your work on pattern coins/Cancelled denominations of United States currency! Enterlousy (talk) 15:26, 26 March 2019 (UTC)


Vandalism

ZLEA, you have signed as vandalism an article edition made by me, the reencarnation of president Kennedy.

If you are near Spain, Zaragoza, you can invite me to a children burger king menu and talk directly about the article and the fact.

With love...

Reincarnation is not accepted by a majority of the general public, nor is it scientifically proven. Wikipedia is written from a neutral point of view, and is religion neutral. - ZLEA T\C 18:08, 27 March 2019 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

The Original Barnstar
I appreciate a lot for saving this article. The original F-3 article may get deleted but I will continue to improve this one. Thank you so much. I edit things that come to mind (talk) 22:42, 28 March 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 March 2019

Breast Cancer Awareness comment

Hello, my name is Ernie Seider. Was looking at the coloring for the US commemorative coins. I had just made a change to the coloring of the Breast Cancer Awareness background. I had done this because I thought that perhaps you had changed the coloring based on metalic content of the coin - since the coin is predominately gold (85%), I had assumed that the background coloring should be the same as for the other gold coins.

In any event, I liked the identification of the gold coins in the table by the use of a yellow background. I had spend a few weeks earlier this year 'fixing' this page - basically reformatting the table to be consistent. I did not make a lot of content changes, except if I saw some errors, or omissions, but even then I am sure that I did not get everything.

I am a coin collector, since 1968 when I started at 10 years old. I liked this page (Modern US Commemorative coins) since that is one of my main areas of concentration with my collection and I liked the Wikipedia article sine it had most of the info I relied on.

In any case, I did not want to 're-change' the background color - when I was 'fixing' the table formatting, I had not even considered using background colors as an option to make perusing the table easier - I thought the idea was very good and had assumed that the specific coloring on that coin was an oversight/mistake.

Hopefully I got this to you properly - my first attempt at contacting an author.

I see that you are an "aviation buff" (I think). I am retired from US government service - all 36 years with the FAA, but not in an operations/air traffic capacity.

Thank you.

Ernie — Preceding unsigned comment added by Esad58 (talkcontribs) 16:00, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

Esad58 I see what you are saying about differentiating compositions with colored templates, but that is not what the templates are meant for. The templates are used to show what color the coin actually is, for example, some cupronickel coins are grey or silver in color, although they are mostly copper, so Template:Coin-silver-color is used. In the case of the Breast Cancer Awareness half eagle, while it still is mostly gold, it has a pinkish-brown color, and Template:Coin-copper-color would more suitable for the coin. According to your philosophy for color template use, the modern dime, quarter, and half dollar should be given a copper color, as they are all mostly copper. - ZLEA T\C 17:29, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

apologies.....

hey ZLEA - sorry for starting a new topic, I'm not real fluent with wiki meta stuff - couldn't see how to reply. Anyway, I agree with your template coloring philosophy - I just wasn't aware that there was a template available - like I said, I'm not real fluent. And I really didn't think thru the coin composition being the basis for the coloring. In any event, I really do like the background coloring differentiation. Now that I know that there is a template, I will use that to continue building on the commemorative coins tables. I'm a cut/copy/paste kind of person, so at least the tables going forward will be consistent.

thank! Ernie Esad58 (talk) 18:05, 31 March 2019 (UTC) (hopefully I signed my post properly lol)

No worries, and I agree that the pink color on the table does not accurately represent the true coin color. - ZLEA T\C 18:22, 31 March 2019 (UTC)

16:29, 1 April 2019 (UTC)

Joseph Trem

Please inform me of how me sharing my opinion on the fate of an article is considered "vandalism". 69.121.195.96 (talk) 18:55, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

You changed other users comments to "keep" and changed the numbers in your IP adress. - ZLEA T\C 18:56, 4 April 2019 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – April 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2019).

Technical news

Arbitration

Miscellaneous

  • Two more administrator accounts were compromised. Evidence has shown that these attacks, like previous incidents, were due to reusing a password that was used on another website that suffered a data breach. If you have ever used your current password on any other website, you should change it immediately. All admins are strongly encouraged to enable two-factor authentication, please consider doing so. Please always practice appropriate account security by ensuring your password is secure and unique to Wikimedia.
  • As a reminder, according to WP:NOQUORUM, administrators looking to close or relist an AfD should evaluate a nomination that has received few or no comments as if it were a proposed deletion (PROD) prior to determining whether it should be relisted.

18:24, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVI, April 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 22:00, 8 April 2019 (UTC)

WikiProject Numismatics newsletter

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:09, 10 April 2019 (UTC)

23:00, 15 April 2019 (UTC)

19:08, 23 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100th anniversary 2016-W Mercury dime gold.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100th anniversary 2016-W Mercury dime gold.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100th anniversary 2016-W Standing Liberty quarter gold.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100th anniversary 2016-W Standing Liberty quarter gold.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:23, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:100th anniversary 2016-W Walking Liberty half dollar gold.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100th anniversary 2016-W Walking Liberty half dollar gold.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:24, 24 April 2019 (UTC)

22:27, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 5

The Signpost: 30 April 2019

WikiProject Numismatics newsletter

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Numismatics at 14:03, 2 May 2019 (UTC). If you do not wish to recieve future newsletters, please remove your name from the mailing list.

Administrators' newsletter – May 2019

News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2019).

Guideline and policy news

Technical news

  • XTools Admin Stats, a tool to list admins by administrative actions, has been revamped to support more types of log entries such as AbuseFilter changes. Two additional tools have been integrated into it as well: Steward Stats and Patroller Stats.

Arbitration

  • In response to the continuing compromise of administrator accounts, the Arbitration Committee passed a motion amending the procedures for return of permissions (diff). In such cases, the committee will review all available information to determine whether the administrator followed "appropriate personal security practices" before restoring permissions; administrators found failing to have adequately done so will not be resysopped automatically. All current administrators have been notified of this change.
  • Following a formal ratification process, the arbitration policy has been amended (diff). Specifically, the two-thirds majority required to remove or suspend an arbitrator now excludes (1) the arbitrator facing suspension or removal, and (2) any inactive arbitrator who does not respond within 30 days to attempts to solicit their feedback on the resolution through all known methods of communication.

Miscellaneous


Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lopifalko was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Lopifalko (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC)
Teahouse logo
Hello, ZLEA! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Lopifalko (talk) 14:50, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

Mass message sender granted

Hello. Your account has been granted the "massmessage-sender" user right, allowing you to send messages to multiple users at once. A few important things to note:

  • Messages should only be sent to groups of users who are likely to be interested in the topic.
  • For regular mailings such as those for WikiProjects, localized events, or newsletters, users should be informed of how they can unsubscribe from future mailings.
  • The mass messaging tool should never be used for canvassing with the intention of influencing the outcome of discussions.

For more information, refer to the guidance for use. If you do not want mass message sender rights anymore, just let me or any other administrator know and we will remove it. Thank you and happy editing! Mz7 (talk) 22:21, 5 May 2019 (UTC)

16:27, 6 May 2019 (UTC)

Coin stubs

I'm loving this back and forth with all these new coin stubs. Thanks so much for doing things like cleaning up redirects, adding infoboxes and images, etc. Nice to just get the ball rolling on lots of new articles and turning links in the navigation template blue. Keep up the great work! ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:33, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

Another Believer Your welcome. I'm not sure if you plan on creating stubs for all US commemoratives, but if you do, the 2018 WWI dollar coin article should probably cover the commemorative medals that were issued commemorating the branches of the military that were active during the conflict. - ZLEA T\C 21:39, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Sounds good. I'm hoping to continue creating stubs (few at a time) per the red links in the navigation template. ---Another Believer (Talk) 21:46, 10 May 2019 (UTC)

The Bugle: Issue CLVII, May 2019

Full front page of The Bugle
Your Military History Newsletter

The Bugle is published by the Military history WikiProject. To receive it on your talk page, please join the project or sign up here.
If you are a project member who does not want delivery, please remove your name from this page. Your editors, Ian Rose (talk) and Nick-D (talk) 11:04, 12 May 2019 (UTC)

00:48, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Inclusion of "medals" in Modern United States commemorative coins article

I see that medals are now being included in the "Modern United States commemorative coins" article. For example, the World War I Centennial medals for 2018, among others. By definition, this article is for US commemorative coins - a coin having a face value - medals do not. The mint has been issuing medals for many years now, mostly bronze (I had purchased a dozen or so a few years back but decided not to collect these). WHile these medals do commemorate things, people, events, they should not be part of this coins page, but probably should be in a separate article dedicated to medals only.

Hope this makes sense. Thank you.

Ernie Esad58 (talk) 03:50, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

Esad58 That is a good idea, however, as you will see at the US Mint's official website, most of the medals issued by the mint are Congressional medals. The First Spouse medals are already covered in Presidential $1 Coin Program. I think that the best way to approach inclusion of medals is to have a separate article for Congressional medals, and include others in Early United States commemorative coins and Modern United States commemorative coins. If you feel that medals should not be included in a coin article, perhaps the articles could be moved to Early/Modern United States commemorative coins and medals. - ZLEA T\C 11:20, 14 May 2019 (UTC)

re: Inclusion of "medals" in Modern United States commemorative coins article

Hey. Sorry, I couldn't figure out how to reply to your reply. Anyway, I like your suggestion about renaming the article to "Modern United States commemorative coins and medals" - probably a lot easier than having separate articles. Maybe instead of separating out all the Congressional medals from what the mint calls "list medals", include all of them in the article, but keep the coins separate from the medals. Thanks again.

Ernie Esad58 (talk) 02:00, 15 May 2019 (UTC)

Esad58 The problem with adding a lot of commemorative medals is that each one adds length to the article, which already has a lot of length after my recent table restructure and addition of non-traditional commemorative coins and medals. I am currently thinking of ways to solve the problem, and thehe best solution I can think of is to split the article by decade. If we do this, then there would be plenty of space to include Congressional medals.
Your thoughts? - ZLEA T\C 13:08, 16 May 2019 (UTC)
I was about to start adding the Congressional medals to the lists in my sandbox, but found that all of them are on sale to this day. This poses a problem as the tables are currently structured for coins/medals that are available for a limited time. As there are no plans to end sales of any of the Congressional medals, the mintage figures may never be known.
There may be a work-around for this problem, though. If the tables are re-structured to include the dates that the coins/medals became available, the mintage could remain blank or N/A without giving the appearance if being incomplete. - ZLEA T\C 14:16, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

13:04, 20 May 2019 (UTC)

15:33, 27 May 2019 (UTC)

A page you started (Quintuple Stella) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Quintuple Stella.

User:Rosguill while reveiwing this page as a part of our page curation process had the following comments:

I changed the target to Stella (United States coin), which seemed to me to be more relevant. I'm not particularly with this topic, however, so feel free to revert if you disagree.

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

signed, Rosguill talk 19:54, 30 May 2019 (UTC)

The Signpost: 31 May 2019

Your editnotice and signature user pages

Hi ZLEA! I was looking at some edit filter logs and I noticed that an IP had added vandalism to some of your user pages (such as the pages I listed in the title). The IP user even created a user page in your user space (it was here) that I deleted per G3. I went ahead and added indefinite edit and move semi-protection to both of these pages in order to stop any future vandalism like this. I didn't see any recent vandalism to your main user page, so I left it be. If you'd like me to add protection to it, just respond and let me know (please make sure to ping me in your reply) and I'll be happy to do so. I figured I'd leave you a message and let you know about the protection I added to those pages. :-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 03:48, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Oshwah Thanks for letting me know. I'm not too worried about my main userpage. However, I believe that User:ZLEA/Userboxes and User:ZLEA/Wikiproject userboxes, which I use as templates on my main userpage, are more susceptible to vandalism. I revert any edits to those pages that were not done by me (unless the edits fix a broken userbox or are reverts of vandalism). - ZLEA T\C 13:54, 31 May 2019 (UTC)
I've applied semi-protection to both of those userbox pages for you. You shouldn't have any more trouble with vandalism on either one of them, but if you do - let me know and I'll be happy to take care of it. ;-) Cheers - ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 13:57, 31 May 2019 (UTC)

Scripts++ Newsletter – Issue 6