User talk:Yoeltkd617

Welcome!

Hello, Yoeltkd617!

Welcome to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia.

Getting Started

Tutorial
Learn everything you need to know to get started.

Introduction to contributing

The Teahouse
Ask questions and get help from experienced editors.

The Task Center
Learn what Wikipedians do and discover how to help.

Tips

Don't be afraid to edit! Just find something that can be improved and make it better. Other editors will help fix any mistakes you make.
It's normal to feel a little overwhelmed, but don't worry if you don't understand everything at first—it's fine to edit using common sense.
If an edit you make is reverted, you can discuss the issue at the article's talk page. Be civil, and don't restore the edit unless there is consensus.
Always use edit summaries to explain your changes.
When adding new content to an article, always include a citation to a reliable source.
If you wish to edit about a subject with which you are affiliated, read our conflict of interest guide and disclose your connection.
Have fun! Your presence in the Wikipedia community is welcome.

Happy editing! Cheers, Illusion Flame (talk) 14:59, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Illusion Flame,

Thank you for the warm welcome and for providing me with all the information I need to get started on Wikipedia. I appreciate the tips you shared, especially about not being afraid to edit and using reliable sources when adding new content. I will make sure to keep these in mind as I begin my journey as a Wikipedia editor.

I'm also glad to know that there's a community of experienced editors who are willing to help and provide guidance. I will definitely visit the Teahouse if I have any questions or need assistance.

Thank you again for the welcome message and I look forward to contributing to Wikipedia!

Best regards,

Yoeltkd617 Yoeltkd617 (talk) 15:03, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Great! I would also check out the Task center for things you can do around here! Illusion Flame (talk) 15:05, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion! I will definitely check out the Task Center and see how I can contribute to Wikipedia. Cheers! Yoeltkd617 (talk) 15:08, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If you have any more questions, my talk page is always open. Illusion Flame (talk) 15:36, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your response. I will keep that in mind and reach out if I have any further questions. Have a great day! Yoeltkd617 (talk) 16:01, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

You too! Illusion Flame (talk) 16:49, 4 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarrasmart (March 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining; draft does not cite the level of in-depth coverage required to indicate the subject meets WP:NCORP criteria for inclusion.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarrasmart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your message. I appreciate the feedback from the reviewer regarding the article I submitted. I will make the necessary improvements according to the established criteria and strive to enhance the quality of the article to meet the requirements for inclusion in Wikipedia.

I would like to ask for assistance and support from experienced editors if I encounter any difficulty in improving the article. I hope to learn from this experience and become a better editor.

Once again, thank you for taking the time to review my article. I will endeavor to improve it as soon as possible and resubmit it after all the issues have been addressed. Yoeltkd617 (talk) 05:10, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yoeltkd617! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 00:50, 5 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarrasmart (March 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CNMall41 were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarrasmart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CNMall41 (talk) 08:16, 19 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarrasmart (May 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Greenman was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tarrasmart and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Greenman (talk) 21:40, 3 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Tarrasmart

Hello, Yoeltkd617. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Tarrasmart, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:02, 13 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Tarrasmart (October 29)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Qcne was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: No improvement to the language.

Qcne (talk) 08:43, 29 October 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Encyclopedic tone

Hello Yoeltkd617, and welcome to Wikipedia! I wanted to leave a note because I just substantially reversed some of your edits here, and I wanted to draw your attention to the neutral, non-promotional tone that is necessary for Wikipedia. I suggest you consider how I revised your edits and keep that tone in mind for your future contributions. If you have any questions, I'm glad to help any time. Happy editing! ~ L 🌸 (talk) 05:26, 5 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Tarrasmart

Hello, Yoeltkd617. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Tarrasmart".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 08:23, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]