User talk:Yeungkahchun

Welcome!

Hello, Yeungkahchun, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --Malerooster (talk) 00:20, 20 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Please use edit summaries

Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. You can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing → Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks!Canterbury Tail talk 14:56, 20 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

This is especially the case with page moves. ViperSnake151 Talk 02:58, 21 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Hi Yeungkahchun! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. I’m inviting you to join other people who edit conservatism-related articles at WikiProject Conservatism! A friendly and fun place where group members can ask questions and meet new colleagues. You'll also discover DYK: the easiest and funnest way to get your article on the Main Page. I hope to see you there! – Lionel^(talk) 02:01, 11 June 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yeungkahchun. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

December 2018

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Pauline Robinson Bush. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. I have restored the AfD template, as the discussion has not been closed yet. Enwebb (talk) 03:07, 4 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas Emhoff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Emhoff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Emhoff until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. – Athaenara ✉ 01:27, 3 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Italy 2026 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Italy 2026. Since you had some involvement with the Italy 2026 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 22:03, 23 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2020 democratic listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 2020 democratic. Since you had some involvement with the 2020 democratic redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:35, 27 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from 60th anniversary of the People's Republic of China into 70th anniversary of the People's Republic of China. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:58, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

i was the author of the prose that was copied~ Yeungkahchun (talk) 23:29, 30 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Reverted edit

Hello, Yeungkahchun. Thank you for your contribution to the page Pokémon: Let's Go, Pikachu! and Let's Go, Eevee!. Unfortunately, the content you added to the lead is not stated in the main body, nor is it sourced in the lead. Because of this, I have reverted your edit. If you would like to re-add your content, feel free to revert my edit. Please ensure that, if you do so, you support your added content either in the main body or with a reference in the lead. For more information about verifiability, see WP:V. Thank you. Stefvanschie (talk) 15:11, 15 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

2023 Military World Games moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, 2023 Military World Games, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Boleyn (talk) 13:34, 26 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

November 2019

Hello, I'm Horse Eye Jack. I noticed that you made an edit concerning content related to a living (or recently deceased) person, but you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source, so I removed it. Wikipedia has a very strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate and clear. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Horse Eye Jack (talk) 17:55, 4 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2020 Ontario Liberal Party leadership election, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Fraser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 07:38, 5 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Chris Tang

Hello, Yeungkahchun,

Thank you for creating Chris Tang.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Consider providing reliable sources to strengthen the page's verifiability.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Meatsgains}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Meatsgains^(talk) 17:32, 20 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Recent death on Godfrey Gao

Hi, per template guidelines:

This template should be used only in cases where many editors (perhaps dozens or more) are editing the article on the same day. It should be removed as soon as this editing subsides. Do not use it merely to tag the article of a recently deceased person, as that is not the template's purpose.

The article is stable at this point; it is being updated with details as they come in by three or four editors, not frantically edited by dozens of editors at a time. The template doesn't need to be on the page. Morgan695 (talk) 04:03, 28 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

List of Pokémon episodes (season 14-current)

Hello, I’ve seen that you’ve redirected this article...to the same page. It’s since been reverted as there was no given reasoning for this. Was this a mistake on your part or was this intentional? HurricaneGeek2002 talk 01:59, 6 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

"Pikavee" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pikavee. Since you had some involvement with the Pikavee redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 02:51, 19 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (2nd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Blue Rescue Team and Red Rescue Team into Pokémon Mystery Dungeon: Rescue Team DX. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. The attribution has been provided for this situation, but if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, please provide attribution for that duplication. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. If you are the sole author of the prose that was copied, attribution is not required. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 11:53, 13 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Careful

Hi, Yeungkahchun, thanks for your edits, but please be careful when making them. Your March 2 edit to Western African Ebola virus epidemic broke several other pages by removing the content between the <section begin /> and <section end /> tags; pages like Zaire ebolavirus depend on the content between those tags to populate things like their case and death counts through the labeled section transclusion mechanism. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 15:53, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, actually, I see that this is probably to do with a Visual Editor bug, not anything you did particularly on your part. Writ Keeper ⚇♔ 16:21, 5 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

COVID

Hello Yeungkahchun, I just noticed you reverted me on the 2019–20_coronavirus_pandemic without providing any summary. Can you tell me why the danger of COVID-19 in one for or the other shouldn't be adressed in the intro of the article ? Iluvalar (talk) 23:23, 12 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your statement "which may be deadlier then common cold outbreaks" was removed for various reasons:

- Not at all relevant in the lead. The point of the lead is to provide a main concise summary of the event. - Further context relating the virus to common cold outbreaks is described later in the article. These details do not belong in the lead which is supposed to be a concise summary of the event. - Your statement is not certain and it is not objective. "Which may be" indicates a degree of unsureness - Not cited at all. Needs to be cited with universally accepted scientific research. - Even if it is factually cited & supported, it does not belong in the main lead as it does not contain - The addition of your statement makes the sentence run-on and too long. The lead has to be to the point. - The sentence does not even make sense as it contains a grammatical error: "then" vs "than" Yeungkahchun (talk)

The potential danger of the virus IS intrinsically the reason why this virus is notorious it MUST be in the lead in that regard, it's highly relevant. It as been dodged by the editors so far because, precisely, of the degree of unsureness around the subject. While I am aware of the shortcomings of this first draft, I assure you that the point of view expressed in the sentence is shared by a significant amount of people. To remove a point of view from an article is against Wikipedia core rules. Even if the sentence is long. Please fix it, do not delete it. Iluvalar (talk) 00:51, 13 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Please discuss disputed sections

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on COVID-19 outbreak; that means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be, when you have seen that other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. --Almaty (talk) 03:00, 15 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Pokemon day" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Pokemon day. Since you had some involvement with the Pokemon day redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 16:35, 16 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"China republic" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the redirect China republic should be deleted, kept, or retargeted. It will be discussed at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 March 24#China republic until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines. Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 17:07, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:2023 Military World Games concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:2023 Military World Games, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:35, 28 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data

Hello Yeungkahchun! Please, do not remove {{Sum}} templates at {{2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data}} as you did here. See Template talk:2019–20 coronavirus pandemic data § Current consensus. Thank you. --MarioGom (talk) 07:24, 31 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring at Donald Trump

Regarding this reversion, please see the nutshell at WP:BRD: "If your edit gets reverted, do not revert again. Instead, begin a discussion with the person who reverted your change to establish consensus." As I said in my edit summary, there is no need to split the term "presumptive nominee". "Republican presumptive nominee" means exactly the same thing without splitting the term.

Please self-revert your re-revert and begin a discussion at Talk:Donald Trump if you feel this is worth it. Thank you. ―Mandruss ☎ 01:12, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I have now self-reverted my re-revert. I made a mistake, and now that I read it again, "Republican presumptive nominee" actually sounds much better. Yeungkahchun (talk) 01:19, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! ―Mandruss ☎ 02:30, 9 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Anita Anand (disambiguation)

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Anita Anand (disambiguation) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G14 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an orphaned disambiguation page which either

disambiguates only one extant Wikipedia page and whose title ends in "(disambiguation)" (i.e., there is a primary topic);
disambiguates zero extant Wikipedia pages, regardless of its title; or
is a redirect with a title ending in "(disambiguation)" that does not target a disambiguation page or page that has a disambiguation-like function.

Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such pages may be deleted at any time. Please see the disambiguation page guidelines for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Shhhnotsoloud (talk) 16:18, 11 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Pokémon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Master Quest and Sun and Moon (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:08, 25 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:2023 Military World Games

Hello, Yeungkahchun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "2023 Military World Games".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 05:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Rotomi" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Rotomi. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 May 26#Rotomi until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 20:55, 26 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

National Anthem of Hong Kong

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at National anthem of Hong Kong. 122.60.80.64 (talk) 22:22, 7 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The National Anthem of Hong Kong IS in fact "March of the Volunteers" (the national anthem of the People's Republic of China) as Hong Kong is officially a Special Administrative Region of the People's Republic of China and is therefore an official territorial component of China.

"God Save the Queen" is the former anthem of colonial period, which is no longer in use and therefore is not the current official anthem of Hong Kong. "Glory to Hong Kong" is a protest anthem popularized in the 2019-20 Protests, and is also now officially actually considered against the National Security Legislation.

Please, do get educated on basic knowledge and do get in touch with the realities of the world before you make any ridiculous statements. =] Yeungkahchun (talk) 00:30, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, do not classify my actions as pro-Beijing nor assume that I am "pro-Beijing" just because I edited a page to reflect factual information. I am not pro-Beijing. If I edited the Wikipedia page of Donald Trump's presidential campaign to reflect valid factual information, does that automatically mean my actions are pro-Trump?

"March of the Volunteers" is the official anthem of Hong Kong. Students in Hong Kong schools sing the national anthem of Hong Kong, the "March of the Volunteers", and all ceremonial procedures in official capacity (such as international events, diplomatic occasions, and school graduations etc) classify the anthem of HK as such. Yeungkahchun (talk) 00:51, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

@Yeungkahchun: March of the Volunteers is the national anthem of China and also used in Hong Kong because it is a part of China. It is not the national anthem of Hong Kong. 122.60.80.64 (talk) 02:45, 8 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind this user; they're just a sockpuppet of CityOfSails. If you notice them again, let me know. Graham87 12:51, 9 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mass removal of Libertarian and Green Party information from 2020 United States presidential election

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at 2020 United States presidential election by removing all content about the Libertarian and Green parties, you may be blocked from editing. — Tartan357 ^(Talk) 21:55, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I understand why the Libertarian and Green party information should have its own section in the nominations but, Why is Libertarian and Green Party information mentioned in the lead of the article? They aren't mentioned in other article pages such as 2012 Yeungkahchun (talk) 22:04, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

You didn't just remove them from the lead; you blanked their nominations sections, as well. Personally, I think they should be included in the lead if they have their own sections, but that is not why I warned you; this is clearly a change that requires an explicit WP:CONSENSUS, but you unilaterally removed a large amount of content without even providing an edit summary. — Tartan357 ^(Talk) 22:08, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies, I recognize that I should not have unilaterally removed the entire section, my apologies again. I will be sure not to make such drastic unilateral changes in the future without consensus~ Yeungkahchun (talk) 22:10, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Discretionary sanctions alert

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in post-1932 politics of the United States and closely related people. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

— Tartan357 ^(Talk) 22:28, 2 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Douglas Emhoff for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Douglas Emhoff is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Douglas Emhoff (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DemonDays64 (talk) 18:25, 12 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of sockpuppetry block

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Yeungkahchun. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Mz7 (talk) 04:07, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Yeungkahchun (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I sincerely apologize for this regrettable situation and take total responsibility for all the negative implications on the Wikipedia community as a result of my sockpuppetry misconduct. I will not make any excuses for this type of malbehaviour as this is totally unacceptable on Wikipddia and I accept any judgement imposed on me. I am ashamed and highly regretful for the breaches of Wikipedia policy and conduct. I fully understand that this indefinite ban is punitive for my disruptions, which I was not aware of but I should have been - no excuses. I sincerely apologize. There is zero excuse for not adhering to and recognizing Wikipedia's policies and conduct, every user must adhere to following Wikipedia's policies. There is no excuse for me not recognizing and understanding Wikipedia's policy with respect to sockpuppetry, it is not good enough to say I didn't know. I should've known that this was not allowed, but I didn't - this is my own fault, solely my fault alone, for not being familiar with formal conduct on Wikipedia and respecting Wikipedia's official policies. There is no excuse for this type of disruptive conduct. I accept the consequences I have received because there is no excuse for ignorance or not "knowing" the rules. I highly and deeply regret my problematic conduct and actions, and should I be so fortunate to be unblocked I will never repeat the same mistakes again. I fully commit to fully observing Wikipedia's policies and guidelines from here on out.

I understand the blocking admin's concern with respect to my sockpuppetry misconduct. I express that I fully want to do better. I acknowledge and recognize that my ban was done in order to deter disruptive behaviors such as sockpuppetry. I fully understand the concerns that led to my ban and I genuinely want to improve on myself. I am fully willingly to show total and complete appreciativeness to the concerns of the blocking administrator with respect to my conduct. I understand the group consensus that led to my ban. I totally accept all punitive actions placed on me, with no objection, as I accept all outcomes stemming from my conduct and I fully abide by the notion of group consensus. I thank the blocking administrator for setting me on the right path and teaching me that wrongful actions have consequences.

I thank the blocking administrator, Mz7, for helping me understand that wrongdoings in life do have consequences. My misconduct of sockpuppetry, has negative implications for Wikipedia. I really love Wikipedia, and by causing going against its policies by conducting sockpuppetry, I have disrespected Wikipedia, its community, and everything it stands for. I love editing on Wikipedia and have grown a passion for it, but this isn't about me or my personal passion. This is more bigger than me or any one person. It's about the dignity of Wikipedia which I blatantly disrespected. I understand and recognize the need for my ban.

I'd like to take this opportunity to thank the blocking administrator, Mz7, for making me realize my harmful actions as it taught me a good life lesson: in life, we must always carefully go over all rules and guidelines and be aware of our actions and the implications of them. In life, one mistake, even if unintentional, can lead to consequences for others and the community around us. This ban has taught me to be more aware of my actions and aware of any potential ramifications of going against policies which cause harmful damage to others and the world around me. In real life, many times people who make regrettable mistakes don't get second chances and that's the way life is. At first, I was upset because I thought I was treated unfairly, but no, I was indeed treated completely fairly. It was I that was being unfair to Wikipedia by not familiarizing myself with its guidelines and going against its very guidelines. It was I that was being deceptive in using a second account to conduct activities that were solely in my own personal interest and harmed Wikipedia's institutions and environmnt. I want to thank the blocking administrator for helping me recognize that in life we have to accept and fully acknowledge when we've done wrong, and that there are consequences for harmful behaviors, whether intentional or nonintentional. Thank you.

I recognize that that purpose of this ban was punitive for my disgraceful actions and in order to prevent further disruption and my problematic behaviour on Wikipedia. I sincerely apologize to Wikipedia and the Wikipedia community at large. I am sorry for my breach of conduct and not familiarizing myself with Wikipedia's policy towards disruptive conduct, namely sockpuppetry, and the implications of disruption. My sincerest and deepest apologies to all. Best Yeungkahchun (talk) 20:21, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

See unblock discussion below. User agrees to an indefinite topic ban from post-1932 American politics. Mz7 (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Mz7, what do you think? Is this unblock request convincing? Yeungkahchun, the block was in fact not punitive; it was preventative. Drmies (talk) 22:53, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
I just want to briefly acknowledge that I am aware of this unblock request. As it appears to be quite a lengthy appeal, I will need time to look into this more closely later today. Mz7 (talk) 05:50, 17 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
My sincerest apologies. I did not express myself correctly. What I meant to say that was that in life there is consequences and implications for certain actions and wrongdoings. My disruptions to Wikipedia ultimately resulted in my ban. The ban is not punitive, but rather a preventative measure to protect the honour and integrity of Wikipedia, deter any possible future harmful disruptions and uphold all the Wikipedia guidelines. My intention is not to take away the severity of my wrong actions or warrant self-pity from others. This is not about me or any "punishments" I may feel I am receiving. This is not about me. This is about Wikipedia. This is about cherishing and upholding Wikipedia's values and everything it stands for. I fully understand the ban took effect in order to deter the harmful disruptions of sockpuppetry. This ban was done to protect and preserve the integrity of Wikipedia, which I blatantly disrupted. I am sincerely sorry for my misconduct with respect to sockpuppetry. It will never happen again. From here on out, I pledge I will completely abide by Wikipedia guidelines and act in good conduct. Thank you for your time. Best Yeungkahchun (talk) 23:06, 16 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Drmies: This is the user's first block after a couple thousand edits going back a couple years; against that backdrop I'm not entirely unwilling to extend additional rope to this user following their apology, but I am a little hesitant. Scanning through the history of this user talk page, many of the topics here are complaints ranging from edit warring to removing sourced material without consensus. Per the SPI evidence, part of the reason why Yeungkahchun created a second account was to continue disruptive edits that they had previously made (on Jill Biden [1] and on 2020 United States presidential election [2]). It seems that most of these disruptive edits have centered around the American politics topic area.
Conditional unblock proposal: Yeungkahchun, I am willing to unblock you, but only on the condition that you agree to an indefinite topic ban from all articles related to post-1932 politics of the United States—this would restrict you from editing articles related to post-1932 American politics after you are unblocked and would be implemented as a discretionary sanction (see #Discretionary sanctions alert above). You would be able to appeal to have this ban lifted after an appropriate time per the procedure at WP:ACDS#Appeals by sanctioned editors. Are these acceptable unblock conditions to you? Mz7 (talk) 01:39, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
These unblock conditions are acceptable to me. Thank you for giving me another chance, I greatly appreciate it. Yeungkahchun (talk) 02:03, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Yeungkahchun, good luck. Mz7, thank you for taking the time, and I fully support what you are doing here. Drmies (talk) 02:33, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notice that you are now subject to an arbitration enforcement sanction

Topic ban lifted per discussion. Mz7 (talk) 05:16, 10 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

The following sanction now applies to you:

You are now indefinitely topic-banned from all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States.

You have been sanctioned for the reasons stated in response to your unblock request.

This sanction is imposed in my capacity as an uninvolved administrator under the authority of the Arbitration Committee's decision at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/American politics 2#Final decision and, if applicable, the procedure described at Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee/Discretionary sanctions. This sanction has been recorded in the log of sanctions. If the sanction includes a ban, please read the banning policy to ensure you understand what this means. If you do not comply with this sanction, you may be blocked for an extended period, by way of enforcement of this sanction—and you may also be made subject to further sanctions.

You may appeal this sanction using the process described here. I recommend that you use the arbitration enforcement appeals template if you wish to submit an appeal to the arbitration enforcement noticeboard. You may also appeal directly to me (on my talk page), before or instead of appealing to the noticeboard. Even if you appeal this sanction, you remain bound by it until you are notified by an uninvolved administrator that the appeal has been successful. You are also free to contact me on my talk page if anything of the above is unclear to you. Mz7 (talk) 02:19, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for giving me another chance. I really appreciate it.

I want to again express my apologies for my disruptive actions. There is no excuse for sockpuppetry, edit warring, or disruptive removal of sourced content on Wikipedia. I was very wrong for sockpuppetting. Again, I want to deeply apologize for using sockpuppetry on 2 occasions on (on Jill Biden [3] and on 2020 United States presidential election [4]). I was being immature by edit warring and using a second account as a sockpuppet. I recognize that I have to collaborate with others around me and respect the point of view of others. It was deceptive to use another account to try to further my own goals and neglecting group consensus from others and the Wikipedia community. I understand your hesitance in fully trusting me, as I have broken the trust of the Wikipedia community with my disruptive actions. I want to express that I truly do not have bad intentions, I now recognize that using two accounts in this way is abusive and unacceptable. Yeungkahchun (talk) 02:23, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I would like to make an important clarification. This topic ban applies to all pages related to post-1932 politics of the United States, not just articles. This means that you also may not edit any discussion page related to American politics. I apologize for not being clear in my wording in the original sanction. Mz7 (talk) 02:30, 18 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Democratic tickets" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Democratic tickets. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 August 31#Democratic tickets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 16:14, 31 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 2

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Miss Chinese International Pageant, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:36, 2 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Conservateur" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Conservateur. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 September 13#Conservateur until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:09, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

India

Hello, I saw your edits on India, which I'm sorry I had to revert. That article is too high-level (i.e. low resolution) and compressed. Your edits, if they are all COVID-related, are more appropriate for COVID-19 pandemic in India. I would first make sure that content is not already in that article, then first post your ideas on the talk page. Best, Fowler&fowler «Talk» 00:50, 14 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Female United States major party vice presidential nominees has been nominated for deletion

Category:Female United States major party vice presidential nominees has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. User:Namiba 14:42, 21 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Yang (surname), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mandarin.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 10:18, 30 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"India virus" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect India virus. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 October 1#India virus until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 17:44, 1 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:52, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Copy/paste moving

You cannot merely copy and paste text from one page to another to move the article. This breaks the page's history, and is inappropriate. These pages have to be moved using the move feature to preserve the history. If this cannot be done manually, it has to be done through requested moves.--十八 07:12, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I didn't know that you couldn't do it that way, thank you for explaining to me. My apologies. I just thought it was weird that DP, BW, XY, SM wikipedia articles had "List of __ episodes" title (first seasons of their series named after the games) where the other seasons didn't. Thank you Yeungkahchun (talk) 18:39, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Pokémon: Diamond and Pearl episodes should be moved back to -> List of Pokémon: Diamond and Pearl episodes for consistency Yeungkahchun (talk) 22:52, 10 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Playstation 6" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Playstation 6. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2020 December 13#Playstation 6 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. User:milkmankarlson (Talk) 13:26, 13 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

December 2020

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to 2022 Winter Olympics, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Normchou ^💬 04:30, 31 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Topic ban

Mz7, remember User_talk:Yeungkahchun#Notice_of_sockpuppetry_block? I saw that I weighed in there as well--please look at the recent contributions by this editor that violate the indefinite topic ban you issued for AP2 as an unblock condition. Yeungkahchun, please stop making such edits until this is cleared up. Drmies (talk) 05:12, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Respectfully, i was merely proposing a discussion of a vote on the talk page whether to use the word. I completely oppose unilaterally adding the word "insurrection" to the page before a group consensus. To be clear, I did not revert anyone's edit once the word "insurrection" was removed and I oppose adding the word "insurrection" unless there is a group consensus. I strongly oppose using the word "insurrection" unless there is group consesus. I initially added the word because I saw the word insurrection being used in the last sentence of the fist paragraph, however I see that there is no consenses to call it an insurrection therefore I regret initially putting the word insurrection. Best, Yeungkahchun (talk) 05:19, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

(edit conflict) Hi, Drmies. Sorry for the confusion, I actually decided to lift the topic ban yesterday after Yeungkahchun asked on my user talk page. Yeungkahchun, it seems that contrary to what you told me on my talk page, you have jumped straight into editing perhaps the most controversial topic in American politics at the moment. You need to slow down. I would avoid these controversial areas entirely for now while you have just been unbanned. Mz7 (talk) 05:28, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you, Mz7, and thank you for your advice for the editor; I hope Yeungkahchun takes them seriously and learns from them. Drmies (talk) 15:34, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I will refrain from the page entirely. My sincerest apologies for this inconvenience. This page is quite controversial thus I will heed your recommendation and slow down. I did not edit-war with anyone and I tried to start a discussion on the talk page on whether to use the word "insurrection", but this page is extremely controversial right now and I regret participating now. My sincerest apologies for getting caught up in the moment, I do not want to cause any trouble to anyone, Best, Yeungkahchun (talk) 05:33, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Yeungkahchun, even if you hadn't just gotten off a topic ban, if you want to edit the first sentence of a highly visible American politics related article, it is almost never a good idea to just edit the sentence directly without first discussing the change on the talk page—see WP:RECKLESS. This whole situation is quite disappointing; please don't make me regret my decision any further. Mz7 (talk) 05:43, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I take fully responsibility for the recklessness in my actions. I now recognize that it is not a good idea to be editting the first sentence without discussion the change on the talk page. From here on out I will not be editing the first sentence of any highly visible page without first discussing the talk page change. My sincerest apologies. I did start a discussion on the talk page after my edit was altered by another user, but I shouldn't even have initially edited the first sentence in the first place without discussion first. Yeungkahchun (talk) 05:50, 11 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Inflammatory redirects

@Mz7 and Drmies: I stumbled upon the following redirects created by this user that seem problematic and are within WP:AP2. Does this violate any existing sanctions?

― Tartan357 ^Talk 09:24, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Tartan357, while I think this was another example of poor judgment to create these redirects in an extremely controversial setting just after being unbanned, they don't technically violate any existing sanctions. Some of them might be RFD-able, but that's a can of worms I think I'll not open. Mz7 (talk) 17:36, 27 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Edit summaries

Yeungkahchun, just a reminder that as a condition of your unblock you agreed to use edit summaries. You yourself said "Starting from now I will leave edit summaries for every edit so it is clear to editors as to why I made changes (in the past I rarely made edit summaries).” Horse Eye's Back (talk) 16:18, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you very much for the advice, I highly appreciate your helping me and guidance. I will try to strive to leave edit summaries that best describe my contributions. Respectfully, the statement made was a pledge of my own doing and suggestion rather than a condition of my unblock, as I was already unblocked for a day after I made that statement which I gave in response to advice he gave me.

Nonetheless, I thank you for your guidance as leaving edit summaries is a habit that I am trying to get myself into now. In the heat of the moment I would hastily edit without leaving edit summaries. This is something I will try to improve on. Thank you, and Best, Yeungkahchun (talk) 18:16, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

To avoid accidentally leaving blank edit summaries, I shall select "Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" on the Editing tab of the user preferences.Yeungkahchun (talk) 18:20, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies if I misinterpreted anything. A good rule of thumb is for the edit summary to be proportional to the edit being made. For example correcting a double period in a subsection probably doesn't need much more of an edit summary than to note the location and the fact that it was a minor edit (the first of which may be done automatically depending on how you edit and the second of which is done semi-automatically by selection the “this is a minor edit” option below the edit summary description). Also for example removing or adding a paragraph to the lead of a major article should have a large edit summary which not only explains what was done but also touches on the policy based justification for it. Obviously most edits lie somewhere in-between the two, its largely a matter of discretion. Horse Eye's Back (talk) 19:41, 12 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Copying within Wikipedia requires attribution (3rd request)

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Pokémon into Pokémon 25th anniversary. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 21:50, 14 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Uyghur Genocide Article

Please refrain from reverting any of my changes on the Uyghur Genocide article. If you disagree with any edits, please open a discussion on the article's talk page. AmericanPropagandaHunter (talk) 02:31, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I did not revert any of your edits. You have mistaken me for someone else as I have never reverted any of your edits, please refer to my user contribution history. Sincerely Yeungkahchun (talk) 03:24, 11 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Miss Hong Kong 2021

The article Miss Hong Kong 2021 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:CRYSTAL, nothing has been decided except for the applications to open. It seems to be an ad to inform someone to apply the contest as there is only links to the TVB website. The cited sources don't say when it will be held.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sun8908 _Talk 12:20, 13 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ash Ketchum in Pokémon Journeys.webp

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ash Ketchum in Pokémon Journeys.webp. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:05, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"First Second Gentleman" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect First Second Gentleman. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 May 31#First Second Gentleman until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 18:12, 31 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Children of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex has been nominated for deletion

Category:Children of Prince Harry, Duke of Sussex has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. DrKay (talk) 21:27, 6 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Potential superpowers

I am seeing that you are rather eager to inappropriately claim that China is an emerging superpower despite lacking any reliable sources that would fulfill the criteria.[5] You used a link from ResearchGate which only expected China to grow more powerful in 2015 isn't a reliable source. The whole website is a social network of graduates and students.

If you read anywhere on Wikipedia that China is an emerging superpower, then consider reverting the misrepresentation, because it is nothing more than a doing from a unrepentant block evading sock (see Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Bryant7728).

@Intforce: you too take a note of this.

Thanks Shankargb (talk) 02:01, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback! Will take note of that! Although I do want to note that many sources and commentators have described China as an emerging superpower, and even as a superpower already. On the other hand, there are also many sources and commentators who have described China as not being an emerging or even a potential superpower. I do agree with you now that the page should be left describing China as a potential superpower as the debate on China's superpower status is very controversial. Unless there is universal irrefutable agreement (like nobody disputes the United States as being a superpower), the page should just remain describing China as a potential superpower. The only reason why China was categorized in its own "emerging superpower" category is that while China is nowhere near the same level as United States, China's status as a potential superpower is much closer to the United States than the other potential superpowers of India, Russia, and the EU , are. (However, this move was unilateral and needs wider consensus due to its controversial nature). China is certainly is not at the same economic development level of India and is well beyond developed than India. As the page already notes the differences of development in the potential superpowers, that is sufficient enough. The status quo of the page should be kept as it is, with India, China, Russia, & EU as potential superpowers, and not describing China as an "emerging" or "arising" superpower due to the multifaceted arguments on both sides (of endorsing and refuting the view of China as being an emerging superpower). Any significant changes however should be discussed on the talk page, and I will no longer try to the change the page from the way that it is right now.

On an unrelated note, honestly I feel the page is quite outdated and needs to be revamped. In my own view, the only countries that honestly should be on that page are China and India (Russia and EU should be moved down to the "Other Countries" heading alongside the category of Israel and Japan). However, any type of drastic changes should be discussed on the talk page and requires consensus.

Best regards Yeungkahchun (talk) 02:48, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Dr. Kieran Moore.png

Thanks for uploading File:Dr. Kieran Moore.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Heartfox (talk) 07:08, 13 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Capitalization

Hi Yeungkahchun - thanks for being so vigilant of Ontario cabinet shuffles and making changes as they're announced to various ministers. I'd ask that you note MOS:JOBTITLES and avoid capitalizing words such as "Minister", "President", etc. It's not grammatically correct as they are not proper nouns. —WildComet ^talk 01:55, 19 June 2021 (UTC) Thank you for the heads up! I just sometimes saw the titles being capitalized by editors, so I didn't know what was the precedent; I should've read over the MOS:JOBTITLES. But thank you for letting me know! Yeungkahchun (talk) 01:58, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Milan Cortina 2026 Paralympics.jpeg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milan Cortina 2026 Paralympics.jpeg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Milan Cortina 2026.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Milan Cortina 2026.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:22, 19 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:CPC 100th Anniversary.png

Thanks for uploading File:CPC 100th Anniversary.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. q28 (talk) 14:51, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ITN recognition for Canadian Indian residential school system

On 25 June 2021, In the news was updated with an item that involved the article Canadian Indian residential school system, which you created. If you know of another recently created or updated article suitable for inclusion in ITN, please suggest it on the candidates page. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 09:53, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party.png

Thanks for uploading File:100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party.png. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. q28 (talk) 11:09, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please note that free pictures c:File:Slogan_for_the_100th_anniversary of_the_founding_of_the_Communist_Party of_China_20210611.jpg is contains the body of the logo and the text below is considered to be {{PD-textlogo}}.--q28 (talk) 11:19, 25 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Moving the page

Please move 2021 Canadian Indian residential schools gravesite discoveries and participate in the discussion on the talk page. - Floydian ^τ _¢ 03:31, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies for unilaterally moving the page without consensus. If the page should be moved, I thought it was to go through the formal move request process so I just moved it back to the page's original name, as it appeared when it was first created. I will participate in the talk page discussion. Yeungkahchun (talk) 03:54, 26 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File:100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. q28 (talk) 11:12, 27 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:100th anniversary of the Chinese Communist Party.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. q28 (talk) 16:57, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Former guy" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Former guy. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 3#Former guy until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. AllegedlyHuman (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for making the page for the new AFN National Chief

I was at an editathon about making pages for notable members of equity-seeking groups in ocean sciences yesterday, and I heard the election results, and immediately thought "I bet the new National Chief doesn't have a wikipedia page, but SHOULD have had one for past contributions." I was right. Thanks for making it! Dawnbazely (talk) 13:39, 9 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Dawnbazely: No problem at all! Just trying to help keep this site up to date with current world events (as fast as possible!) as the news breaks! From one Wikipedian to another, thank you for all of your contributions on Wikipedia as well! Have a nice day! :) Yeungkahchun (talk) 02:39, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 11

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Claude Joseph, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Lambert.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:56, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Warning on my talk page

I noticed your warning on my talk page. You claimed me making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Please specify which edits are you talking about. It is not appropriate to put this warning without giving enough explanations. (you did not even mention the article) If you think my edits on Miss Hong Kong 2021 is unconstructive, I already gave explanations. Please read them carefully.

Please also note that it should not be you who put this message on my talk page, as per WP:UW#Commitment to civility as you are clearly in dispute with me in several articles.

Read WP:VD carefully before recognizing any editors as vandals.

If you really think I am a vandal, you can always report me to administrators.

Thank you. Eight96Four (talk) 12:32, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eight96Four: Please understand that there is no animosity between us. You are not a vandal, and you have made excellent contributions to the site. I do respect many of the past contributions you have made on Wikipedia, such as the article Internet censorship in Hong Kong and the Hong Kong protests timeline articles, and also thank you for your creation of much needed articles (such as July 1 police stab, 2021 Hong Kong Charter), so with all respect, thank you. Thank you.

Areas of concern are that you should not be unilaterally mass deleting legitimate content without consensus, such as:

information at British Columbia with respect to the 2021 Canadian Indian residential schools gravesite discoveries - important being the major sociopolitical issue news headlines of a country (breaking news headlines for months)

beauty contest information at Miss Hong Kong 2021 - validated by the official pageant site. The pageant information is legitimate, furthermore the pageant can literally be viewed on YouTube and other video streaming sites which verifies that the contestant information is correct

Yeungkahchun (talk) 19:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replies

I have replied your messages on my talk page. Please read them. To conclude, I suggest you read wikipedia guidelines carefully, especially WP:RS, WP:OR, and WP:Vandalism before you edit anything or say any edits are wrong. Eight96Four (talk) 01:01, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eight96Four: I reviewed your contributions and replies, and it has caused me to reconsider for the British Columbia. I have reconsidered, and your edits are not "wrong". In fact you are quite right, I support what you said with regards to the British Columbia page. I have since reduced the sentence as you recommended as it is exhaustive to list every event in detail, it will get too comprehensive. Each individual grave should not be included word by word. And for the Miss Hong Kong page requires better citations than the wordpress. Best Yeungkahchun (talk) 01:14, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Think carefully next time you put the warning. Thanks. Eight96Four (talk) 02:00, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Akshay Tandon moved to draftspace. Only primary sources cited. Improve in drafts.

An article you recently created, Akshay Tandon, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:20, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Anita Sharma (journalist) moved to draftspace. Only primary sources cited. Twitter can not be considered a source. Please improve in drafts before moving to mainspace.

An article you recently created, Anita Sharma (journalist), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Nomadicghumakkad (talk) 02:23, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Hong Kong 2021

I noticed you adding back the names of the participants with two more sources. There are multiple issues.

The two added sources are the same but in different languages.
The added sources are also not reliable. I found the website using photographs/reports from China medias, such as CCTV. So the three sources are all not reliable. It is more like a blog website than a news website. As the website is unknown, it should not be treated as reliable/independent. We don't know if the editor is paid to write this.
Please translate the occupation of participants back to English. We also don't need their Chinese names.
If you can't find any reliable sources I will revert your edits. Thank you.

Eight96Four (talk) 02:24, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

As seen in you contributions, you often add unreliable sources such wikipedia, youtube, twitter, wordpress, all kind of things. I suggest you read WP:RS carefully to see which sources are reliable and which are not. Eight96Four (talk) 02:29, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to ask me if I have watched the pageant, no. I don't care if the information is valid or not, but if the sources are reliable. Eight96Four (talk) 02:39, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I shall revamp the page with reliable sources as you recommended Yeungkahchun (talk) 02:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eight96Four: Also be careful of the three-revert rule which states: An editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page—whether involving the same or different material—within a 24-hour period. So you can't revert until 24 hours later because you have already made 2 reverts on Miss Hong Kong 2021 within 24hoursYeungkahchun (talk) 03:09, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Eight96Four: I have cited U Lifestyle: 首頁 (https://www.ulifestyle.com.hk), a health, travel & beauty news organization based in Hong Kong. It is an independent source and it is not affiliated with CCTV or CCP media https://hk.ulifestyle.com.hk/topic/detail/215914/%E9%A6%99%E6%B8%AF%E5%B0%8F%E5%A7%902021-tvb%E5%85%AC%E5%B8%8328%E4%BD%8D%E5%85%A5%E5%9C%8D%E6%B8%AF%E5%A7%90%E5%90%8D%E5%96%AE-%E4%BD%B3%E9%BA%97%E7%B6%93%E5%BD%A2%E8%B1%A1%E6%94%B9%E9%80%A0%E5%BE%8C%E5%88%9D%E6%AC%A1%E7%99%BB%E5%A0%B4 Yeungkahchun (talk) 03:26, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"XXR" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect XXR. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 5#XXR until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. _signed,Rosguill ^talk 19:36, 5 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:Li Zhenning.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Li Zhenning.jpeg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

Go to the file description page and add the text {{Di-replaceable fair use disputed|<your reason>}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing <your reason> with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification, per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. -- Marchjuly (talk) 14:26, 7 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

File permission problem with File:Pokémon Evolutions.png

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Evolutions.png. I noticed that while you provided a valid copyright licensing tag, there is no proof that the creator of the file has agreed to release it under the given license.

If you are the copyright holder for this media entirely yourself but have previously published it elsewhere (especially online), please either

make a note permitting reuse under the CC-BY-SA or another acceptable free license (see this list) at the site of the original publication; or
Send an email from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en@wikimedia.org, stating your ownership of the material and your intention to publish it under a free license. You can find a sample permission letter here. If you take this step, add {{OTRS pending}} to the file description page to prevent premature deletion.

If you did not create it entirely yourself, please ask the person who created the file to take one of the two steps listed above, or if the owner of the file has already given their permission to you via email, please forward that email to permissions-en@wikimedia.org.

If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:File copyright tags#Fair use, and add a rationale justifying the file's use on the article or articles where it is included. See Wikipedia:File copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have provided evidence that their copyright owners have agreed to license their works under the tags you supplied, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Files lacking evidence of permission may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F11 of the criteria for speedy deletion. You may wish to read Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 19:31, 23 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Hendery has been accepted

Hendery, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Waddles 🗩 🖉 02:54, 24 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:54, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited China, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bloomberg.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:59, 25 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

On Li Zhenning

Hi, I came across this article while doing New Page Patrol. In case you miss my comments in the edit summary on why I have turned this page into a redirect on review is that the bulk of the article is about his time with the boyband. It does not fulfil the notability guidelines as laid upon at WP:NBANDMEMBER. As for his solo career, in the article, there is only one television series that he starred in, which if we are to consider as for the notability guidelines for actors (WP:NACTOR), it is too soon for the subject to have his own article. (Further more, it requires a better source than douban.) I have turned the page into a redirect instead of shifting it into draftspace or AfD-ing is because I feel that it is just a matter of time that the subject is notable on his own right (not now). Give the subject some time to build his portfolio of solo activities and the article can be improved further. – robertsky (talk) 21:42, 26 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Akshay Tandon

Hello, Yeungkahchun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Akshay Tandon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Anita Sharma (journalist)

Hello, Yeungkahchun. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Anita Sharma (journalist), a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 03:02, 15 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"President Ji" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect President Ji and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 January 5#President Ji until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. feminist (talk) 07:59, 5 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: 2022 Winter Olympics closing ceremony (January 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission appears to be a news report of a single event and may not be notable enough for an article in Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:NOT#NEWS and Wikipedia:ONEEVENT for more information.

The comment the reviewer left was:

A case of WP:TOOSOON

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:2022 Winter Olympics closing ceremony and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:2022 Winter Olympics closing ceremony, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 01:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeungkahchun! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 01:26, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Anita Sharma (journalist)

Hello, Yeungkahchun. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Anita Sharma".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:23, 15 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

The reason I had started the article in the draftspace was I didn't know how big the final drop of Master Journeys was going to be, so I couldn't give a substantial section after the lede, I didn't think it would be right to just plop it in the mainspace. I'm especially happy I don't need to go through the approval process.--CreecregofLife (talk) 16:05, 11 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

No worries, thank you for starting the draft first so it could be published as soon as it was announced! Yeungkahchun (talk) 03:18, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Janet Lam

The article Janet Lam has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Completely non-notable. Fails WP:BIO.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. scope_creep^Talk 15:00, 26 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Pokemon 2022" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Pokemon 2022 and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 November 22#Pokemon 2022 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Pizzaplayer219^Talk_Contribs 14:49, 22 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:35, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokémon Season 24.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Season 24.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:29, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Pokémon Season 25.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Pokémon Season 25.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:30, 10 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]

February 2023

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! CT55555(talk) 07:12, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the tip! Will do so ahead. My bad for the inconveniences caused. Yeungkahchun (talk) 07:23, 11 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Miss Hong Kong 2023 moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Miss Hong Kong 2023. Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it has no sources. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. BoyTheKingCanDance (talk) 05:01, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

May 2023

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into another page with a different name. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:12, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yeungkahchun,

If you disagree with an article being moved to Draft space, please move it back to main space rather than cutting and pasting and starting a second version of the article. This breaks up the page history and makes attribution more complicated. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 05:14, 14 May 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Jeffrey Northrup for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Jeffrey Northrup is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jeffrey Northrup until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Rob (talk) 01:24, 22 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

CS1 error on Oli London

Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page Oli London, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:

A bare URL error. References show this error when one of the URL-containing parameters cannot be paired with an associated title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. (Fix | Ask for help)

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can report it to my operator. Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 21:50, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Timeline of Pokémon for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Timeline of Pokémon is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Timeline of Pokémon until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Has one ever considered Magneton? Pokelego999 (talk) 19:02, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

"Australia 2032" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Australia 2032 has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 August 21 § Australia 2032 until a consensus is reached. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:46, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of USA 2028

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on USA 2028 requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2019_September_26#Japan_2020. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Hey man im josh (talk) 16:50, 21 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 2 December 2024. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:39, 19 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]