Jump to content

User talk:Yellow Evan/Archive 18

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


The Signpost: 01 April 2013

[edit]

CSU Fresno Research Figures

[edit]

Hi Yellow Evan: Was just reviewing the Mountain West entry and noticed the endowment and research figures for nearly every school were inaccurate based on my general knowledge of regional schools in the west. Using the latest Chronicle of Higher Ed and published NSF source data, I went back through and updated these two figures for each institution, past, present and future. My note about "CSUF" was indeed in reference to CSU, Fresno. If you refer to the NSF source data and scroll down to page 26 of the PDF, you will see my figure is accurate. If you have a reliable source that provides contrary data, then please provide it. Also, for consistency, it's probably better if all figures from each school come from the same source(s). I've also noticed the enrollment figures for many of the institutions listed are inaccurate, but I haven't had time to locate a common source for those numbers. Those figures may require separate source refs from each university's own published enrollment data set. Here's the link to the research data source referenced in the table: http://www.nsf.gov/statistics/nsf12330/pdf/nsf12330.pdf Please see PAGE 26 et al for confirmation of CSU, Fresno's total R&D expenditures from all funding sources including federal, state and private. The exact figure is $8,698,000. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.123.36.20 (talk) 07:17, 7 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Lists at FLC

[edit]

If you have time or interest, feel free to take a look at my two lists at FLC: List of awards and nominations received by Fiona Apple and List of songs recorded by Pink Martini. Thanks so much! --Another Believer (Talk) 15:56, 8 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Hernan (1996), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Daily News and Herald Journal (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:35, 9 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 08 April 2013

[edit]

Who reads Wikipedia?

[edit]

Hi. You asked a question in WP:ITN/C regarding which nations read WP the most. You may find this Signpost article interesting. Cheers --LukeSurl t c 13:16, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Your last question on NCAA basketball before discussion was closed

[edit]

[[1]] –HTD 13:29, 11 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Favio

[edit]

Be careful and remember that i can find you all of the JTWC advisories within 10-15 minutes of a request.Jason Rees (talk) 19:34, 15 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Liza (1976), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages United State, Hut and College of Pacific (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 02:13, 17 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 15 April 2013

[edit]

2010 Guatemala City sinkhole

[edit]

In your edit summary here, you say that this will be turned into a sub-article of Hurricane Agatha. First of all, what do you mean by this? Do you intend to merge the two articles? Secondly, the sinkhole's formation is largely independant from Tropical Storm Agatha; it was formed by leaks from sewage pipes. Also, the Background section does not seem to cover anything besides Agatha; the sewer system played a large part in the formation of the sinkhole. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 00:24, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

A lot of the information you added seems to be only related to the hurricane, and not strictly relevant to the sinkhole itself. 069952497aComments and complaintsStuff I've done 00:26, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Timeline Symbols Help

[edit]

I've seen quite a few articles with those silly timeline symbols again. I'm not trying to stir up a commotion about it again, but I have a suggestion to help fix this issue, and I need help. How about instead of having a symbol next to the cyclone's timeline bar, we could put a mouse-hover option instead. What I mean by "mouse-hover" option is when a viewer (color blind or not) hovers their mouse over a cyclone's timeline bar, that the cyclone's exact intensity will pop-up (just like when you hover over a link, a little message pops up on what the name of the link is). Now, I'm not sure how this process could be carried out, and I'm not sure how to tweak timelines so that option is available. I'm asking you to maybe help in the process and maybe ask more experienced users to help as well. Would you like to help? ST✪12 01:13, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]


Speed trap reliable source ?

[edit]

Dear Yellow Evan, what kind of "reliable source" you want for the speed trap information ? There are things which cannot be "reliably" documented but we all know that these things exist. If a small town in the middle of nowhere collects numerous complains of the speed traps (and I provided many Internet links justifying the information), then by the nature of the matter this information must be reliable enough. You will not find a government-sponsored academic research covering this topic (speed traps in Beatty, NV). We are not talking about invasion of the aliens or else - this is the things that everybody knows exist. Setting impossibly high standards on reporting these things is essentially covering the crime. Imagine if a woman would report a rape - and you demand a "reliable source" to justify her claim. This is very frustrating. I suppose that this is bordering dishonesty and cover-up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holger67 (talk • contribs) 01:17, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Well, you saying a newspaper is good enough ? "The Beatty News" is OK newspaper for you ? There are reports in the Beatty News:

http://beattynews.info/2012/07_27_2012.pdf http://beattynews.info/2011/05_20_2011.pdf

This is a forgotten place, and finding an article in "New York Times" or "National Geographic" about Beatty is a rather unfair requirement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holger67 (talk • contribs) 03:15, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the suggestion. I am using a pair of links to the Beatty News. By the way, the very original article used the information from the Beatty News, too - just from the different issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Holger67 (talk • contribs) 05:34, 24 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cyclone Favio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Stand-by, Hai, Caia and Outflow
1984–85 Australian region cyclone season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Centre Island and Trawlers
1985–86 Australian region cyclone season (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Bowen and Fitzroy Island
Hurricane Joanne (1972) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Phoenix and Flagstaff

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:40, 25 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 22 April 2013

[edit]

Re: GT

[edit]

I barely had anything to do with 1959 (just the Escuminac hurricane), so you can nominate something if you want. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 16:31, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TB

[edit]
Hello, Yellow Evan. You have new messages at Talk:Hurricane Joanne (1972)/GA1.
Message added 18:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

The initial review has been completed. Sven Manguard Wha? 18:11, 26 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Went back to 1970/1971 for Australia

[edit]

Thanks for starting the process. Please, look over what has been done after the GAN is over with. The South Pacific needs to be extended back to 1970/1971. I'm not sure I'll get to that as quickly. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:15, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

You are keeping busy then. =) Maybe someone else will help with the project in the meantime. Thegreatdr (talk) 04:28, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Joanne (1972) is a GA

[edit]

Huzzah. Congratulations on dominating the cup group by the way. Sven Manguard Wha? 16:39, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Douglas

[edit]

Make sure you remove it from WP:GA. ♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 19:12, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Heh, I unwatched the page when I saw you merged it. I'll get to it later. --♫ Hurricanehink (talk) 20:40, 27 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 29 April 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Cyclone Eric (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Outflow
Cyclone Favio (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to 25th parallel
Cyclone Osea (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Cook Island

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:46, 2 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Hurricane Joanne (1972)

[edit]

The DYK project (nominate) 00:02, 5 May 2013 (UTC)

DYK for Cyclone Favio

[edit]

 — Crisco 1492 (talk) 08:24, 6 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 April newsletter

[edit]

We are a week into Round 3, but it is off to a flying start, with Republic of Rose Island Sven Manguard (submissions) claiming for the high-importance Portal:Sports and Portal:Geography (which are the first portals ever awarded bonus points in the WikiCup) and Wales Cwmhiraeth (submissions) claiming for a did you know of sea, the highest scoring individual did you know article ever submitted for the WikiCup. Round 2 saw very impressive scores at close; first place New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and second place Colorado Sturmvogel_66 (submissions) both scored over 1000 points; a feat not seen in Round 2 since 2010. This, in part, has been made possible by the change in the bonus points rules, but is also testament to the quality of the competition this year. Pool C and Pool G were most competitive, with three quarters of participants making it to Round 3, while Pool D was the least, with only the top two scorers making it through. The lowest qualifying score was 123, significantly higher than last year's 65, 2011's 41 or even 2010's 100.

The next issue of The Signpost is due to include a brief update on the current WikiCup, comparing it to previous years' competitions. This may be of interest to current WikiCup followers, and may help bring some more new faces into the community. We would also like to note that this round includes an extra competitor to the 32 advertised, who has been added to a random pool. This extra inclusion seems to have been the fairest way to deal with a small mistake made before the beginning of this round, but should not affect the competition in a large way. If you have any questions or concerns about this, please feel free to contact one of the judges.

A rules clarification: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on 29/30 April, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 15:42, 7 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 06 May 2013

[edit]

2012 Christmas tornado outbreak

[edit]

I noticed that you failed this GAN without explaining to me what was wrong with it. I believe that I corrected the mistakes from the first GAN, so I ask what is wrong with it now. United States Man (talk) 02:27, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello? Don't ignore me. United States Man (talk) 19:07, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I never saw a link to that page. I must be blind. United States Man (talk) 22:53, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Jimena (2009), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page San Carlos (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 19:36, 11 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your notice

[edit]

Your notice was reverted because I do not need it on my talkpage. Maxim(talk) 21:58, 12 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

May 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1983 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s and 1 "<>"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:13, 13 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1940–48 Pacific hurricane seasons may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 13 May 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Hurricane Calvin (1993), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Puerto Escondido (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 00:42, 20 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 20 May 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Tropical Storm Julio (2002), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Manzanillo and James Franklin (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:52, 27 May 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 27 May 2013

[edit]

June 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Hurricane Ismael (1983) may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 13:12, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Cyclone Namu may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:05, 8 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1953 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • season was part of a decade-long absence of major hurricanes; from 1950-56, no major hurricanes (Category 3 or higher on the [[Saffir-Simpson Hurricane Wind Scale]] were reported in the [[tropical

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 14:55, 17 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

Hurricane Ismael (1983) (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added links pointing to Inland Empire and Malibu
Cyclone Namu (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
added a link pointing to Bellona

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:02, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 05 June 2013

[edit]

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

[edit]
Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

  • Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".
  • Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).
  • Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 15:02, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 12 June 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1953 Pacific hurricane season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages 14th parallel and 20th parallel (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:27, 18 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 19 June 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyclone Clotilda, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:17, 25 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 26 June 2013

[edit]

Um...?

[edit]

I must say that I am quite surprised at you, Yellow Evan. Arguing with a sockpuppet. Have you nothing better to do. :D But of course, I would have probably done the same thing. Coming from someone who spent over an hour reading the Earth100 fiasco, I think Chinese people should stick to the Chinese Wikipedia. Always fun to joke around (You didn't think I actually meant that did you). Anyway, feel free to do this to me if you feel I've done something silly. United States Man (talk) 04:11, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, that suggestion would be a great WP policy failure. And God forbid that happens. United States Man (talk) 04:17, 28 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiCup 2013 June newsletter

[edit]

We are down to our final 16: the 2013 semi-finals are upon us. A score of 321 was required to survive round 3, further cementing this as the most competitive WikiCup yet; round 3 was survived in 2012 with 243 points, in 2011 with 76 points and in 2010 with 250 points. The change may in part be to do with the fact that more articles are now awarded bonus points, in addition to more competitive play. Reaching the final has, in the past, required 573 points (2012, a 135% increase on the score needed to reach round 4), 150 points (2011, a 97% increase) and 417 points (2010, a 72% increase). This round has seen over a third of participants claiming points for featured articles (with seven users claiming for multiple featured articles) and most users have also gained bonus points. However, the majority of points continue to come from good articles, followed by did you know articles. In this round, every content type was utilised by at least one user, proving that the WikiCup brings together content contributors from all corners of the project.

Round 3 saw a number of contributions of note. Idaho Figureskatingfan (submissions) claimed the first featured topic points in this year's competition for her excellent work on topics related to Maya Angelou, the noted American author and poet. We have also continued to see high-importance articles improved as part of the competition: Wyoming Ealdgyth (submissions) was awarded a thoroughly well-earned 560 points for her featured article Middle Ages and 102 points for her good article Battle of Hastings. Good articles James Chadwick and Stanislaw Ulam netted Australia Hawkeye7 (submissions) 102 and 72 points respectively, while 72 points were awarded to Poland Piotrus (submissions) for each of Władysław Sikorski and Emilia Plater, both recently promoted to good article status. Collaborative efforts between WikiCup participants have continued, with, for example, New South Wales Casliber (submissions) and Canada Sasata (submissions) being awarded 180 points each for their featured article on Boletus luridus.

A rules reminder: content promoted between rounds can be claimed in the round after the break, but not the round before. The case in point is content promoted on the 29/30 June, which may be claimed in this round. If you are concerned that your nomination—whether it is at good article candidates, a featured process, or anywhere else—will not receive the necessary reviews, please list it on Wikipedia:WikiCup/Reviews. We are currently seeing concern about the amount of time people have to wait for reviews, especially at GAC- if you want to help out with the WikiCup, please do your bit to reduce the review backlogs! Questions are welcome on Wikipedia talk:WikiCup, and the judges are reachable on their talk pages or by email. Good luck! If you wish to start or stop receiving this newsletter, please feel free to add or remove yourself from Wikipedia:WikiCup/Newsletter/Send. J Milburn (talk • email) and The ed17 (talk • email) 09:48, 1 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Amusement Park Quarter 3, 2013 Newsletter

[edit]
WikiProject Amusement Parks Newsletter

Quarter 3, 2013

463 124 5.13 50 30% »
Full edition
Unassessed Articles Coordinates Needed WikiWork Load Project Members B&M articles are GA or FA

22:57, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

Wikiholic (Do not take this seriously)

[edit]

Welcome to your umpteenth year on Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to live constructively, at least part of your life did not appear to be constructive because you were using Wikipedia. However, please do not use recreational drugs in the place of any further editing you would like to make. Instead, take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing constructively to society. Thank you.—CycloneIsaac–E-Mail 05:04, 4 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 03 July 2013

[edit]

Deny Deny Deny

[edit]

just a suggestion but if you feed the trolls...they keep coming back. Let Iphone Hurricane just have his five minutes of fun and shortly he will be blocked. Hell In A Bucket (talk) 01:26, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

1941 Cabo San Lucas hurricane

[edit]

Hi, I'll be review the article here. Thanks in advance for your work in the article! It won't take me too long to review it. Cheers, ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 20:21, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Good Article Barnstar
Congratulations for your work on 1941 Cabo San Lucas hurricane! ComputerJA (☎ • ✎) 23:49, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for the barnstar. YE Pacific Hurricane 23:53, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2013

[edit]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 2013 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/tcfaqG.html|at=[http://www.aoml.noaa.gov/hrd/tcfaq/G1.html G1) When is hurricane season ?]|author1=Chris Landsea|author2=Neal Dorst (ed.)|publisher=[[Atlantic
  • cyclone warnings and watches|tropical storm warning]] was issued from [[Acapulco]] to La Fortuna]];<ref name="Erick 13" /> the ports of Acapulco, Zihuatanejo, and Manzanillio were closed.<ref name=

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:48, 7 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to 1983 Pacific hurricane season may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
  • first noted on September 10 south of the Gulf of Tehuantepec. Despite the presence of wind shear]], the EPHC upgraded the tropical disturbance into a tropical depression on 0600 UTC on September 12.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:19, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

2008 Pacific Hurrucane Season

[edit]

Why don't we use the ACE thing for measuring activity of a season, but instead using number of storms? --BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 20:41, 8 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Inking

[edit]

So it's the 10th. Someone else changed it again however the deal has yet to be inked. I'm still a little new to editing current event articles so is the change by brick still a good faith edit?

The Signpost: 10 July 2013

[edit]

Norma Image

[edit]

But, why? The image I replaced the previous with was while it was at peak intensity. Supportstorm (talk) 04:03, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Emilia auther

[edit]

i had too re-add the staff writter as a auther for Emily 1994 because without it it look bad. BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 05:36, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

[edit]
Hello, Yellow Evan. You have new messages at BlueTropicalWave's talk page.
Message added 02:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

BlueTropicalWave (Talk) 02:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Signpost: 17 July 2013

[edit]
[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Cyclone Kamisy, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Reunion (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:13, 21 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Retrieved from "https://wiki.riteme.site/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Yellow_Evan/Archive_18&oldid=1168309967"