Jump to content

User talk:XICO

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, XICO, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 04:58, 31 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by The Mirror Cracked was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, ChicoBuarque! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! The Mirror Cracked (talk) 05:03, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 18:04, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Grão Pará and Maranhão Company has been accepted

[edit]
Grão Pará and Maranhão Company, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

The Mirror Cracked (talk) 20:10, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Attention needed at username change request

[edit]

Hello. A renamer or clerk has responded to your username change request, but requires clarification before moving forward. Please follow up at your username change request entry as soon as possible. Thank you. ‐‐1997kB (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Anarchism

[edit]

Hi XICO,

I saw your work on articles related to anarchism and wanted to say hello, as I work in the topic area too. If you haven't already, you might want to watch our noticeboard for Wikipedia's coverage of anarchism, which is a great place to ask questions, collaborate, discuss style/structure precedent, and stay informed about content related to anarchism. Take a look for yourself!

And if you're looking for other juicy places to edit, consider expanding a stub, adopting a cleanup category, or participating in one of our current formal discussions.

Feel free to say hi on my talk page and let me know if these links were helpful (or at least interesting). Hope to see you around. czar 22:15, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]


July 2020

[edit]

Copyright problem icon Your addition to Social ecology (Bookchin) has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted material, including text or images from print publications or from other websites, without an appropriate and verifiable license. All such contributions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. — Yours, Berrely • TalkContribs 09:24, 3 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Democratic confederalism, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Internationalist (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:19, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Democratic confederalism, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Equality and Profit (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:44, 11 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Eastern Algeria Arabic moved to draftspace

[edit]

An article you recently created, Eastern Algeria Arabic, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 17:03, 15 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

September 2020

[edit]

Information icon Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from Samba into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. Moneytrees🏝️Talk🌴Help out at CCI! 16:48, 19 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Latin music invitation

[edit]
You are invited to join invite to join the WikiProject Latin music, a WikiProject dedicated to improving articles related to music performed in Spanish, Portuguese and languages of Ibero-America. Simply click here to accept! Or, if you're interested in reading more on Latin music, you may want to check out the Latin music portal.

I've noticed your edits on samba-related articles and thought you might be interested. There's also a Brazilian arts task force as well if you're interested. Erick (talk) 02:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Samba-enredo, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bombo.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:20, 20 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bossa nova

[edit]

I like what you added to bossa nova, but it contains many English grammar errors. I could try to fix it, but it would be mostly guesswork. Can you go back and review your changes please, or find someone who can help you? Viriditas (talk) 17:03, 13 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Beitar Jerusalem F.C., you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Anti-Islam.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:14, 11 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Eastern Algeria Arabic

[edit]

Hello, XICO. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Eastern Algeria Arabic".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! UnitedStatesian (talk) 23:27, 16 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Third opinion request

[edit]

Hi XICO,

I saw that you edited Çukurova Arabic in the past.

We have an ongoing debate about the content of the summary and the infobox of Levantine Arabic. Especially about the use of Levantine dialects in Turkey. You can find the debate on the talk page. As you have some knowledge of the region, it would be great to have your opinion.

Thanks for any help you can provide. A455bcd9 (talk) 10:13, 10 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

[edit]
Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:35, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparative law, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Civil law.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 8 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:26, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

[edit]

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on LeadStory, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ~ lovkal (talk) 20:32, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

[edit]
Information icon

Hello XICO. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:XICO. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=XICO|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:14, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dear Seraphimblade. This accusation of "undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic" is utterly absurd. Based on what? The "nature of [my] your edits' related to politics or sports? You're an administrator. You should exercise more responsibility in your judgments and interpretations before making such a serious accusation. Serious, but entirely ludicrous regarding my edits. Seriously. You could have simply deleted the topic. And it would have been okay. Now, accusing me of having an "undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic" was ridiculous and unfortunate. I merely created a topic about a news broadcast streaming whose existence I discovered today! I searched for information about it, but found none, and thus, I thought it would be a good idea to create a simple topic, as it seemed to meet notability criteria. I made a voluntary edit like all the others I've made! Zero interest in promoting a topic. If the said topic doesn't meet notability criteria, that's perfectly fine. Now, I am surprised by the lack of care from an administrator, who should be experienced enough to discern between a 'paid advocate' and an ordinary editor like myself. XICO (talk) 21:53, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Well, I'm certainly pretty good at seeing when it's a possibility. I can't read minds, of course, so I can never tell with certainty, but when I see marketese junk like With a focus on individualized video news, LeadStory ensures users stay informed while enjoying a personalized viewing experience. Additionally, LeadStory operates as a personalized news streaming platform aimed at optimizing returns for publishers by delivering their quality content directly to consumers., there's a pretty strong possibility somebody got paid to write that kind of "copy". Though now that I take another look, I'm pretty sure I see the actual problem—it looks like that text was generated by a chatbot. Please ensure that you do not ever again use a chatbot to write any article content; it should be in your own words. Seraphimblade Talk to me 21:58, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Seraphimblade. Upon rereading, I acknowledge that you are entirely correct in pointing out that the majority of the text was marketing jargon. Indeed, it was generated by OpenAI's artificial intelligence - out of sheer laziness and haste, without the slightest care to review and identify that, in fact, the result was a mess that truly seemed to be paid work. I read very quickly, without taking the slightest care to identify that it had become pure marketing - terrible, by the way - and I feel completely ashamed for not having reviewed the text as Wikipedia deserved. I apologize to the entire community, and the lesson for me is to refrain from using AI-generated text. I apologize for the tone of indignation in my previous response. I hope you understand that it was nothing personal; I was merely disappointed by the accusation. Yours sincerely, XICO (talk) 22:18, 4 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]
[edit]

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2000 FIFA Club World Championship, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page ISL.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:00, 11 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]