Jump to content

User talk:WilliamLeee1

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work. Rusalkii (talk) 04:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, WilliamLeee1! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rusalkii (talk) 04:25, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 4)

[edit]
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Theroadislong was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia.
Theroadislong (talk) 08:21, 4 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Wigan (July 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by TipsyElephant was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
TipsyElephant (talk) 03:08, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Wigan (July 5)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 09:26, 5 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 05:45, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Wigan (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Bonadea were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
bonadea contributions talk 05:51, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 6)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 10:01, 6 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

July 2022

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm Jimfbleak. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they appeared to be promotional. Advertising and using Wikipedia as a "soapbox" are against Wikipedia policy and not permitted; Wikipedia articles should be written objectively, using independent sources, and from a neutral perspective. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about Wikipedia. Please stop. I would have blocked you by now if I hadn't noticed that you haven't actually been warned about persistent self-promotion. Jimfbleak - talk to me? 12:56, 13 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mark Wigan (July 22)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Hoary was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Hoary (talk) 12:26, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (July 26)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DoubleGrazing was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:45, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Please do not create multiple drafts on the same topic. Thanks, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:46, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Well there might be some system error here cuz I only submitted once, and the other one was declined already, so I made some changes by deleting some paragraphs this morning. WilliamLeee1 (talk) 06:52, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
There is no 'system error', there are quite clearly two separate drafts, at Draft:Mark Wigan and User:WilliamLeee1/sandbox, both of which were submitted for pre-publication review by you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:21, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
I am sorry I am a new editor, but I don't know how to remove the Draft:Mark Wigan, it seems that there is no option to remove it on the page or maybe I don't know how to remove it, could you pls tell me how to remove it? the only one I need is this one User:WilliamLeee1/sandbox WilliamLeee1 (talk) 08:06, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
Okay, no worries. You can either place the {{Db-author}} tag on the top of the draft you want to have deleted, or simply blank the contents; either way, an admin will then come along and delete the page for you. Note, though, that this is only an option where you are the only substantive editor involved in creating that draft, and looking at Draft:Mark Wigan this may no longer be the case. You can still try, and if the deletion request is declined, we can then consider other options (which would probably mean you keeping Draft:Mark Wigan and deleting the sandbox version instead). Best, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:14, 26 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]